Skip to main content

Unifying Ethical Concepts

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Science and Technology Convergence
  • 2492 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter considers nanotechnology innovation, particularly in the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) in the USA, and the emergence in the NNI of fundamental unifying societal and ethical ideas that provide a basis for approaches to other emerging (and convergent) technologies. In it I employ the term “societal science” to reference these ideas and practices that emerge from the nanotechnology case and have the potential to enable the essential goal of converging technologies – that of harmonizing science and society. The chapter begins with my candidate list of the core societal implications that have emerged across the very broad sweep of nanotechnology applications. I then take up in turn each of the five basic principles for convergence cited by Roco, Bainbridge, Tonn, and Whitesides in the CKTS report (Convergence of knowledge, technology and society: beyond convergence of nano-bio-info-cognitive technologies. Springer, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London, 2013) in relation to what we have learned about societal and ethical implications of nanotechnologies. What follows is a brief assessment of the question of how much nanotechnologies’ “societal science” can generalize to other emergent technologies and also scale up in convergence. The larger purpose of this piece thus is to consider how applicable what we have learned from the case of nanotechnology in society will be to fulfilling the fundamental goal of CKTS, defined as “transformative actions to improve societal outcomes.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barben D, Fisher E, Selin C, Guston DH (2008) Anticipatory governance of nanotechnology: foresight, engagement and integration. In: Hackett EJ, Amsterdamska O, Lynch ME, Wajcman J (eds) The new handbook of science and technology studies. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 979–1000

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaudrie CEH, Satterfield T, Kandlikar M, Harthorn BH (2013) Expert Views on Regulatory Preparedness for Managing the Risks of Nanotechnologies. PLoS ONE 8(11): e80250. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins H, Evans R, Gorman ME (2010) Chapter 2, Trading zones and interactional expertise. In: Gorman M (ed) Trading zones and interactional expertise: creating new kinds of collaboration. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 7–25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Corner A, Pidgeon N (2012) Nanotechnologies and upstream public engagement: dilemmas, debates, and prospects. In: Harthorn BH, Mohr J (eds) The social life of nanotechnology. Routledge, New York/London, pp 169–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Stern PC (eds) (2008) Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. National Research Council/The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff B (1995) Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of progress. Risk Anal 15(2):137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman M (ed) (2010) Trading zones and interactional expertise: creating new kinds of collaboration. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory R, Lichtenstein S, Slovic P (1993) Valuing environmental resources: a constructive approach. J Risk Uncertain 7:177–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harthorn BH, Mohr JM (eds) (2012) The social life of nanotechnology. Routledge, New York/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays SA, Robert JS, Miller CA, Bennett I (eds) (2013) Nanotechnology, the brain, and the future. Springer, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D (2011) Thinking fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mody CCM (2011) Instrumental community: probe microscopy and the path to nanotechnology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Owen R, Bessant J, Heintz M (eds) (2013) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker R, Appelbaum RP (eds) (2012) Emerging economies, emerging technologies: can technology make a difference in development? Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkhill K, Pidgeon NF, Corner AJ, Vaughan N (2013) Deliberation and responsible innovation: a geoengineering case study. In: Owen R, Bessant J, Heintz M (eds) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley, London, pp 219–240

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Perrow C (1999) Normal accidents: living with high risk technologies. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Pidgeon NF, Rogers-Hayden T (2007) Opening up nanotechnology dialogue with the publics: risk communication or ‘upstream engagement’? Health Risk Soc 9:191–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pidgeon NF, Harthorn B, Bryant K, Rogers-Hayden T (2009) Deliberating the risks of nanotechnology for energy and health applications in the US and UK. Nat Nanotechnol 4:95–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2010) Report to the President and Congress on the Third Assessment of the National Nanotechnology Initiative. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-nni-report.pdf

  • Roco MC, Bainbridge WS, Tonn B, Whitesides G (eds) (2013) Convergence of knowledge, technology and society: beyond convergence of nano-bio-info-cognitive technologies. Springer, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Satterfield T, Gregory R, Klain S, Roberts M, Chan K (2013) Culture, intangibles and metrics in environmental management. J Environ Manage 117:103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P (ed) (2000) The perception of risk. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC, Fineberg HV (eds) (1996) Understanding risk: informing decisions in a democratic society. National Academies Press/National Research Council, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Hoven J, Doorn N, Swierstra T, Koops B-J, Romijn H (eds) (2014) Responsible innovation 1: innovative solutions for global issues. Springer, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Herr Harthorn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Harthorn, B.H. (2016). Unifying Ethical Concepts. In: Bainbridge, W., Roco, M. (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Convergence. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_54

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics