Skip to main content

Changing User’s Safety Locus of Control through Persuasive Play: An Application to Aviation Safety

  • Conference paper
Persuasive Technology (PERSUASIVE 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8462))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Virtual risk experiences have been proposed in persuasive technology as an approach to change people’s attitudes and behaviors concerning safety topics. This paper advances the investigation of virtual risk experiences in different directions. First, we extend the study of their effects to safety locus of control, which is an important predictor of an individual’s attitudes and behaviors with respect to risky situations. Second, we explore a design that relies much more on play than previous virtual experiences of risks in the literature. Third, we extend the investigation of persuasive technology to a topic in aviation safety (i.e., assuming a proper brace position during an emergency landing) that has never been approached before with an interactive system and we analyze if a novel game-based approach can be effective in fostering awareness of this fundamental safety action. Our study shows that the proposed persuasive game produces noteworthy results in terms of learning safety knowledge and improves players’ attitudes towards aircraft accidents, increasing their internal safety locus of control and decreasing the external one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boeing: Statistical summary of commercial jet airplane accidents. Boeing, Seattle (2011), http://www.boeing.com/news/techissues/pdf/statsum.pdf

  2. Chang, Y., Yang, H.: Cabin safety and emergency evacuation: Passenger experience of flight CI-120. Accident Analysis and Prevention 43, 1049–1055 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cherry, R.G.W.: A Study Analyzing the Trends in Accidents and Fatalities in Large Transport Airplanes. Technical Report DOT/FAA/TC-13/46, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chang, Y., Liao, M.: The effect of aviation safety education on passenger cabin safety awareness. Safety Science 47, 1337–1345 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chittaro, L.: Passengers’ Safety in Aircraft Evacuations: Employing Serious Games to Educate and Persuade. In: Bang, M., Ragnemalm, E.L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7284, pp. 215–226. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Chittaro, L., Zangrando, N.: The Persuasive Power of Virtual Reality: Effects of Simulated Human Distress on Attitudes towards Fire Safety. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6137, pp. 58–69. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Corbett, C.L., McLean, G.A., Cosper, D.K.: Effective Presentation Media for Passenger Safety I: Comprehension of Briefing Card Pictorials and Pictograms. Final Report DOT/FAA/AM-08/20, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cosper, D., McLean, G.: Availability of passenger safety information for improved survival in aircraft accidents. Technical Report DOT/FAA/AM-04/19, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. de Hoog, N., Stroebe, W., de Wit, J.B.F.: The processing of fear-arousing communications: How biased processing leads to persuasion. Social Influence 3(2), 84–113 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Floyd, D.L., Prentice-Dunn, S., Rogers, R.W.: A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 30, 407–429 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hoyt, M.F.: Internal–external control and beliefs about automobile travel. Journal of Research in Personality 7, 288–293 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang, J.L., Ford, J.K.: Driving locus of control and driving behaviors: Inducing change through driver training. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 15, 358–368 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hunter, D.R.: Development of an aviation safety locus of control scale. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 73, 1184–1188 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hunter, D.R., Stewart, J.E.: Locus of Control, Risk Orientation, and Decision Making Among U.S. Army Aviators. Technical Report 1260, U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Fort Rucker, AL (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hunter, D.R., Stewart, J.E.: Safety Locus of Control and Accident Involvement Among Army Aviators. International Journal of Aviation Psychology 22, 144–163 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jones, J.W., Wuebker, L.J.: Safety locus of control and employees’ accidents. Journal of Business and Psychology 7, 449–457 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Meijnders, A., Midden, C., McCalley, T.: The Persuasive Power of Mediated Risk Experiences. In: IJsselsteijn, W.A., de Kort, Y.A.W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3962, pp. 50–54. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Montag, I., Comrey, A.L.: Internality and externality as correlates of involvement in fatal driving accidents. Journal of Applied Psychology 72, 339–343 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Muir, H., Thomas, L.: Passenger education: past and future. In: Proceedings of the 4th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rogers, R.W.: Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of Protection Motivation. In: Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E. (eds.) Social Psychophysiology: A Sourcebook, pp. 153–176. Guilford Press, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rotter, J.B.: Social Learning and Clinical Psychology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1954)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Ruiter, R.A.C., Abraham, C., Kok, G.: Scary warnings and rational precautions: a review of the psychology of fear appeals. Psychology and Health 16, 613–630 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shahab, L., Hall, S., Marteau, T.: Showing smokers with vascular disease images of their arteries to motivate cessation: a pilot study. British Journal of Health Psychology 12, 275–283 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Taylor, A., Moorcroft, D., DeWeese, R.: Effect of passenger position on crash injury risk. In: Proceedings of the 7th Triennial International Fire & Cabin Safety Research Conference, Philadelphia, USA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Thomas, L.J.: Passenger Attention to Safety Information. In: Bor, R. (ed.) Passenger Behaviour, Ashgate, UK (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  27. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration: Advisory Circular AC 121-24B (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Witte, K., Allen, M.: A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education and Behavior 27, 591–616 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wuebker, L.J.: Safety locus of control as a predictor of industrial accidents and injuries. Journal of Business and Psychology 1, 19–30 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. You, X., Ji, M., Han, H.: The effects of risk perception and flight experience on airline pilots’ locus of control with regard to safety operation behaviors. Accident Analysis & Prevention 57, 131–139 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zaalberg, R., Midden, C.: Enhancing Human Responses to Climate Change Risks through Simulated Flooding Experiences. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6137, pp. 205–210. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chittaro, L. (2014). Changing User’s Safety Locus of Control through Persuasive Play: An Application to Aviation Safety. In: Spagnolli, A., Chittaro, L., Gamberini, L. (eds) Persuasive Technology. PERSUASIVE 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8462. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07127-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07127-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07126-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07127-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics