Skip to main content

Comparison of Tree-Based Ensembles in Application to Censored Data

  • Conference paper
Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing (ICAISC 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8467))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2384 Accesses

Abstract

In the paper the comparison of ensemble based methods applied to censored survival data was conducted. Bagging survival trees, dipolar survival tree ensemble and random forest were taken into consideration. The prediction ability was evaluated by the integrated Brier score, the prediction measure developed for survival data. Two real datasets with different percentage of censored observations were examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersen, P.K., Borgan, O., Gill, R.D.: Statistical Models based on Counting Processes. Springer, New York (1993)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bobrowski, L., Kretowska, M., Kretowski, M.: Design of neural classifying networks by using dipolar criterions. In: Proc. of the Third Conference on Neural Networks and Their Applications, Kule, Poland, pp. 689–694 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bou-Hamad, I., Larocque, D., Ben-Ameur, H.: A rewiew of survival trees. Statistics Surveys 5, 44–71 (2011)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Kalbfleisch, J.D., Prentice, R.L.: The statistical analysis of failure time data. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Gerds, T.A., Cai, T., Schumacher, M.: The performance of risk prediction models. Biometrical Journal 50(4), 457–478 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Graf, E., Schmoor, C., Sauerbrei, W., Schumacher, M.: Assessment and comparison of prognostic classification schemes for survival data. Statistics in Medicine 18, 2529–2545 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harrell, F.E., Califf, R.M., Pryor, D.B., Lee, K.L., Rosati, R.A.: Evaluating the yield of medical tests. Journal of American Medical Association 247, 2543–2546 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hothorn, T., Lausen, B., Benner, A., Radespiel-Troger, M.: Bagging survival trees. Statistics in Medicine 23, 77–91 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hothorn, T., Buhlmann, P., Dudoit, S., Molinaro, A.M., van der Laan, M.J.: Survival ensembles. Biostatistics 7, 355–373 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Ishwaran, H., Blackstone, E.H., Pothier, C.E., Lauer, M.S.: Relative risk forest for exercise heart rate recovery as a predictor of mortality. Journal of the American Statistical Association 99, 591–600 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Ishwaran, H., Kogalur, U.B., Blackstone, E.H., Lauer, M.S.: Random survival forests. Annals of Applied Statistics 2, 841–860 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Ishwaran, H., Kogalur, U.B.: Random Forests for Survival, Regression and Classification (RF-SRC), R package version 1.3 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kaplan, E.L., Meier, P.: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 5, 457–481 (1958)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Kretowska, M.: Dipolar regression trees in survival analysis. Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering 24(3), 25–33 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Krętowska, M.: Random forest of dipolar trees for survival prediction. In: Rutkowski, L., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A., Żurada, J.M. (eds.) ICAISC 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4029, pp. 909–918. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. LeBlanc, M., Crowley, J.: Relative risk trees for censored survival data. Biometrics 48, 411–425 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mogensen, U.B., Ishwaran, H., Gerds, T.A.: Evaluating Random Forests for Survival Analysis Using Prediction Error Curves. Journal of Statistical Software 50(11), 1–23 (2012), http://www.jstatsoft.org/v50/i11/

    Google Scholar 

  18. Peters, A., Hothorn, T.: ipred: Improved Predictors, R package version 0.9-2 (2013), http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ipred

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kretowska, M. (2014). Comparison of Tree-Based Ensembles in Application to Censored Data. In: Rutkowski, L., Korytkowski, M., Scherer, R., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A., Zurada, J.M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing. ICAISC 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8467. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07173-2_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07173-2_47

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07172-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07173-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics