Skip to main content

Togetherness: Multiple Pedagogical Conversational Agents as Companions in Collaborative Learning

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 8474))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This study investigates the design of effective interaction using pedagogical conversational agents (PCAs) as companions in collaborative learning activities. Specifically, we focus on the use of embodied PCAs that evoke social awareness and engagement from human learners. In controlled experiments, paired collaborative learners were selectively accompanied by “peer-advisor” PCAs in a set of learning activities. Results show that learners who engaged with multiple PCAs gained a better understanding of target concepts than those using a single PCA. Furthermore, learners who engaged PCAs playing different collaborative roles (e.g., “mentor” and “expert”) outperformed those who engaged PCAs without distinct roles. The implications of these results are explored and directions for future study are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated Learning - Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar, R., Rose, C.: Architecture for building conversational agents that support collaborative learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 4(1), 21–34 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Graesser, A., McNamara, D.: Self-regulated learning in learning environments with pedagogical agents that interact in natural language. Educational Psychologist 45(4), 234–244 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baylor, A.L., Kim, Y.: Simulating instructional roles through pedagogical agents. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 15(1), 95–115 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baylor, A.L., Ryu, J.: The API (Agent Persona Instrument) for Assessing Pedagogical Agent Persona. In: Lassner, D., McNaught, C. (eds.) Proc. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, pp. 448–451 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gulz, A., Haake, M.: Design of animated pedagogical agents: A look at their look. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 63(4), 322–339 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, Y., Baylor, A.L., Shen, E.: Pedagogical agents as learning companions: The impact of agent emotion and gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 23(3), 220–234 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Heidig, S., Clarebout, G.: Do pedagogical agents make a difference to student motivation and learning? Educational Research Review 6(1), 27–54 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chi, M., Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., Lavancher, C.: Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science 18(3), 439–477 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Okada, T., Simon, H.: Collaborative discovery in a scientific domain. Cognitive Science 21(2), 109–146 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shirouzu, H., Miyake, N., Masukawa, H.: Cognitively active externalization for situated reflection. Cognitive Science 26(4), 469–501 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Holmes, J.: Designing agents to support learning by explaining. Computers and Education 48(4), 523–547 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moreno, R., Mayer, E.: Role of guidance, reaction, and interactivity in an agent-based multi-media game. Journal of Educational Psychology 97(1), 117–128 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hayashi, Y.: Learner-support agents for collaborative interaction: A study on affect and communication channels. In: Proc. 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, pp. 232–239 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Salomon, G.: Distributed Cognition: Psychological and Educational Considerations. Cambridge University Press, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Miyake, N.: Constructive interaction and the interactive process of understanding. Cognitive Science 10, 151–177 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hayashi, Y., Miwa, K., Morita, J.: A laboratory study on distributed problem solving by taking different perspectives. In: Proc. 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 333–338. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hayashi, Y.: On pedagogical effects of learner support agents in collaborative interaction. In: Cerri, S.A., Clancey, W.J., Papadourakis, G., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7315, pp. 22–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Hayashi, Y.: Pedagogical conversational agents for supporting collaborative learning: Effects of communication channels. In: Proc. CHI EA 2013, pp. 655–660. ACM Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Levine, D., Resnick, L.B., Higgins, E.T.: Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 44, 585–612 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Alport, F.H.: The influence of the group upon association and thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology 3, 159–182 (1920)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee, E.J., Nass, C.: Experimental tests of normative group influence and representation effects in computer-mediated communication when interacting via computers differs from interacting with computers. Human Communication Research 28(3), 349–381 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Beck, B.U., Wintermantel, M., Borg, A.: Principles of regulating interaction in teams practicing face-to-face communication versus teams practicing computer-mediated communication. Small Group Research 36, 499–536 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hayashi, Y. (2014). Togetherness: Multiple Pedagogical Conversational Agents as Companions in Collaborative Learning. In: Trausan-Matu, S., Boyer, K.E., Crosby, M., Panourgia, K. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8474. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07220-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07221-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics