Skip to main content

Animated Presentation of Pictorial and Concept Map Media in Biology

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 8474))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Intelligent tutoring systems are beginning to include more varied forms of media, but little is known about how to choose the appropriate media and whether or not it should be animated. This study used a 2 (animated/static) x 2 (picture/concept map) factorial design in order to evaluate the effect of animation and media type on conceptual knowledge, relational knowledge, and free recall. Learners on Mechanical Turk (N = 208) were exposed to one of four conditions in which they viewed a modified Khan Academy video on cell parts. We found that animation induced higher learning gains when it comes to relational knowledge. For conceptual knowledge, animated concept maps outperformed animated pictures while static pictures produced slightly more learning than static concept maps. Our results indicate that using animations to slowly build complexity in visual displays is particularly important when the displays have a rich structure as in concept maps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Graesser, A.C., Lu, S., Jackson, G.T., Mitchell, H., Ventura, M., Olney, A., Louwerse, M.M.: AutoTutor: A Tutor with Dialogue in Natural Language. Behav. Res. Meth. Instum. Comput. 36, 180–193 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. VanLehn, K., Lynch, C., Schultz, K., Shapiro, J.A., Shelby, R.H., Taylor, L., Treacy, D., Weinstein, A., Wintersgill, M.: The Andes Physics Tutoring System: Lessons Learned. IJAIED 15(3), 147–204 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Olney, A.M., D’Mello, S., Person, N., Cade, W., Hays, P., Williams, C., Lehman, B., Graesser, A.: A Computer Tutor that Models Expert Human Tutors. In: Cerri, S.A., Clancey, W.J., Papadourakis, G., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7315, pp. 256–261. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Leelawong, K., Biswas, G.: Designing Learning by Teaching Agents: The Betty’s Brain System. IJAIED 18(3), 181–208 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Butler, H.A., Forsyth, C., Halpern, D.F., Graesser, A.C., Millis, K.: Secret Agents, Alien Spies, and a Quest to Save the World: Operation ARIES! Engages Students in Scientific Reasoning and Critical Thinking. In: Miller, R.L., Rycek, R.F., Amsel, E., Kowalski, B., Beins, B., Keith, K., Peden, B. (eds.) Programs, Techniques and Opportunities, vol. 1, pp. 286–291. Society for the Teaching of Psychology, Syracuse (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schnotz, W., Cade, W.: Adaptive Multimedia Environments. In: Sottilare, R., Hu, X., Graesser, A. (eds.) Design Recommendations for Adaptive Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Adaptive Instructional Strategies, vol. 2. Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, MD (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bétrancourt, M., Dillenbourg, P., Montarnal, C.: Computer Technologies in Powerful Learning Environments: The Case of Using Animated and Interactive Graphics for Teaching Financial Concepts. In: De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., Entwistle, N., van Merrienböer, J. (eds.) Powerful Learning Environment: Unravelling Basic Components and Dimensions, pp. 143–157. Elsevier, Oxford (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Höffler, T., Leutner, D.: Instructional Animation Versus Static Pictures: A Meta-analysis. Learn. Instr. 17, 722–738 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lowe, R., Schnotz, W., Rasch, T.: Aligning Affordances of Graphics with Learning Task Requirements. Appl. Cognitive Psych. 25(3), 452–459 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nesbit, J., Larios, H., Adesope, O.: How Students Read Concept Maps: A Study of Eye Movements. In: Montgomerie, C., Seale, J. (eds.) EDMEDIA 2007, pp. 3961–3970. AACE, Waynesville (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Blankenship, J., Dansereau, D.: The Effect of Animated Node-Link Displays on Information Recall. J. Exp. Educ. 68(4), 293–308 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Adesope, O., Nesbit, J.: Animated and Static Concept Maps Enhance Learning from Spoken Narration. Learn. Instr. 27, 1–10 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mayer, R., Hegerty, M., Mayer, S., Campbell, J.: When Static Media Promotes Active Learning: Annotated Illustrations Versus Narrated Animations in Multimedia Instruction. J. Exp. Psychol.-Appl. 11(4), 256–265 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bloom, B.S.: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. David McKay Co. Inc., New York (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Novak, J.D., Cañas, A.J.: The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them. Technical Report, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bétrancourt, M., Bisseret, A., Faure, A.: Sequential Display of Pictures and its Effect on Mental Representations. In: Rouet, J.F., Levonen, J.J., Biardeau, A. (eds.) Multimedia Learning: Cognitive and Instructional Issues, pp. 112–118. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sweller, J.: Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Sci. 12, 257–285 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ross, J., Irani, I., Silberman, M.S., Zalvidar, A., Tomlinson, B.: Who are the Crowdworkers?: Shifting Demographics in Amazon Mechanical Turk. In: Mynatt, E.D., Schoner, D., Fitzpatrick, G., Hudson, S.E., Edwards, W.K., Rodden, T. (eds.) CHI EA 2010, pp. 2863–2872. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mason, W., Suri, S.: Conducting Behavioral Research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behav. Res. 44(1), 1–23 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., Ipeirotis, P.G.: Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making 5, 411–419 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Suri, S., Watts, D.J.: Cooperation and Contagion in Web-based, Networked Public Goods Experiments. PLoS One 6(3) e16836 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Williams, B., Williams, C., Volgas, N., Yuan, B., Person, N.: Examining the role of gestures in expert tutoring. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) ITS 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6094, pp. 235–244. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cade, W.L., Maass, J.K., Hays, P., Olney, A.M. (2014). Animated Presentation of Pictorial and Concept Map Media in Biology. In: Trausan-Matu, S., Boyer, K.E., Crosby, M., Panourgia, K. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8474. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_52

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_52

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07220-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07221-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics