Skip to main content

Relationship between Student Writing Complexity and Physics Learning in a Text-Based ITS

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 8474))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2689 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we study 2217 essays written during ITS-based physics tutoring. Using output from the Stanford parser, we calculate various simple and more complex linguistic features, including average sentence length, tree height and number of subordinate clauses. Using the WEKA J48 implementation of the C4.5 algorithm and other statistics, we attempt to find relationships between linguistic features, the complexity of the students’ text, students’ scores on a physics posttest and their learning gain from the tutoring sessions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Quinlan, J.: C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Litman, D., Silliman, S.: ITSPOKE: An Intelligent Tutoring Spoken Dialogue System. In: Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics Demonstration Papers, pp. 5–8 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. VanLehn, K., et al.: The Architecture of Why2-Atlas: A Coach for Qualitative Physics Essay Writing. In: Cerri, S.A., Gouardères, G., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2363, pp. 158–167. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Flesch, R.: A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology 32, 221–233 (1948)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Litman, D., Rosé, C., Forbes-Riley, K., VanLehn, K., Bhembe, D., Silliman, S.: Spoken vs. Typed Human and Computer Dialogue Tutoring. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 16(2), 145–170 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lipschultz, M., Litman, D., Jordan, P., Katz, S.: Predicting Changes in Level of Abstraction in Tutor Responses to Students. In: Proceedings of the 24th International FLAIRS Conference, pp. 525–530 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Graesser, A., McNamara, D., Louwerse, M., Cai, Z.: Coh-Metrix: Analysis of Text on Cohesion and Language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers 36, 193–202 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Freedman, R., Krieghbaum, D. (2014). Relationship between Student Writing Complexity and Physics Learning in a Text-Based ITS. In: Trausan-Matu, S., Boyer, K.E., Crosby, M., Panourgia, K. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8474. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_96

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_96

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07220-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07221-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics