Skip to main content

A Three Stages to Implement Barriers in Bayesian-Based Bow Tie Diagram

  • Conference paper
Book cover Modern Advances in Applied Intelligence (IEA/AIE 2014)

Abstract

The preventive and protective barriers in Bow tie diagrams are often defined by experts that ignore the real aspect of the system. Thus implementing barriers in Bow tie diagrams in automatic way remains a real challenge. This paper proposes a new approach to implement preventive and protective barriers. This approach is based on the multi-objective influence diagrams which are a graphical model to solve decision problems with multiple objectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Badreddine, A., Amor, N.B.: A Bayesian approach to construct bow tie diagrams for risk evaluation. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 91(3), 159–171 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cockshott, J.E.: Probability bow-ties: A transparent risk management tool. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 83(4), 307–316 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Couronneau, J.C., Tripathi, A.: Implementation of the new approach of risk analysis in france. In: 41st International Petroleum Conference, Bratislava (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Delvosalle, C., Fievez, C., Pipart, A., Debray, B.: ARAMIS project: A comprehensive methodology for the identification of reference accident scenarios in process industries. Journal of Hazardous Materials 130(3), 200–219 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Diehl, M., Haimes, Y.Y.: Influence diagrams with multiple objectives and tradeoff analysis. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans 34(3), 293–304 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Availability, Reliability, SIL Whats the difference?, http://www.mtl-inst.com

  7. Kumamoto, H., Henley, E.J.: Automated fault tree synthesis by disturbance analysis. Industrial Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals 25(2), 233–239 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Saaty, T.L.: Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Management science 32(7), 841–855 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Khakzad, N., Khan, F., Amyotte, P.: Dynamic safety analysis of process systems by mapping bow-tie into Bayesian network. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 91(1), 46–53 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Léger, A., Duval, C., Weber, P., Levrat, E., Farret, R.: Bayesian network modelling the risk analysis of complex socio technical systems. In: Workshop on Advanced Control and Diagnosis, ACD 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pearl, J.: Fusion, propagation, and structuring in belief networks. Artificial intelligence 29(3), 241–288 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Shachter, R.D.: Evaluating influence diagrams. Operations Research 34(6), 871–882 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 100, 9–34 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Sklet, S.: Comparison of some selected methods for accident investigation. Journal of Hazardous Materials 111(1), 29–37 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Badreddine, A., Ben HajKacem, M.A., Ben Amor, N. (2014). A Three Stages to Implement Barriers in Bayesian-Based Bow Tie Diagram. In: Ali, M., Pan, JS., Chen, SM., Horng, MF. (eds) Modern Advances in Applied Intelligence. IEA/AIE 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8482. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07467-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07467-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07466-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07467-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics