Skip to main content

Credal Decision Trees to Classify Noisy Data Sets

  • Conference paper
Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Systems (HAIS 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8480))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Credal Decision Trees (CDTs) are algorithms to design classifiers based on imprecise probabilities and uncertainty measures. C4.5 and CDT procedures are combined in this paper. The new algorithm builds trees for solving classification problems assuming that the training set is not fully reliable. This algorithm is especially suitable to classify noisy data sets. This is shown in the experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abellán, J., Moral, S.: Building classification trees using the total uncertainty criterion. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 18(12), 1215–1225 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Abellán, J.: Uncertainty measures on probability intervals from Imprecise Dirichlet model. International Journal of General Systems 35(5), 509–528 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Abellán, J., Masegosa, A.: Bagging schemes on the presence of noise in classification. Expert Systems with Applications 39(8), 6827–6837 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Demsar, J.: Statistical Comparison of Classifiers over Multiple Data Sets. Journal of Machine Learning Research 7, 1–30 (2006)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Klir, G.J.: Uncertainty and Information, Foundations of Generalized Information Theory. John Wiley, Hoboken (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Mantas, C.J., Abellán, J.: Analysis and extension of decision trees based on imprecise probabilities: application on noisy data. Expert Systems with Applications 41, 2514–2525 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Quinlan, J.R.: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann series in Machine Learning (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shannon, C.E.: A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 423, 379–423, 623–656 (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Walley, P.: Inferences from multinomial data, learning about a bag of marbles. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 58, 3–57 (1996)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Witten, I.H., Frank, E.: Data Mining, Practical machine learning tools and techniques, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mantas, C.J., Abellán, J. (2014). Credal Decision Trees to Classify Noisy Data Sets. In: Polycarpou, M., de Carvalho, A.C.P.L.F., Pan, JS., Woźniak, M., Quintian, H., Corchado, E. (eds) Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Systems. HAIS 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8480. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07617-1_60

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07617-1_60

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07616-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07617-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics