Skip to main content

Unit Testing Tool Competitions – Lessons Learned

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Future Internet Testing (FITTEST 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8432))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper reports about the two rounds of the Java Unit Testing Tool Competition that ran in the context of the Search Based Software Testing (SBST) workshop at ICST 2013 and the first Future Internet Testing (FITTEST) workshop at ICTSS 2013. It describes the main objectives of the benchmark, the Java classes that were selected in both competitions, the data that was collected, the tools that were used for data collection, the protocol that was carried out to execute the benchmark and how the final benchmark scores for each participating tool were calculated. Eventually, we discuss the challenges encountered during the events, what we learned and how we plan to improve our framework for future competitions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://code.google.com/

  2. 2.

    http://sourceforge.net/

  3. 3.

    https://github.com/

References

  1. Apache Commons Lang v3.1. http://commons.apache.org/lang. Accessed 22 Feb 2013

  2. Apache Lucene v4.1.0. http://lucene.apache.org. Accessed 22 Feb 2013

  3. Async Http Client v1.7.20. https://github.com/AsyncHttpClient/async-http-client. Accessed 03 Sept 2013

  4. Barbecue v1.5 beta. http://barbecue.sourceforge.net. Accessed 22 Feb 2013

  5. Cobertura v1.9.4.1. http://cobertura.sourceforge.net. Accessed 22 Feb 2013

  6. Eclipse checkstyle plugin v5.6.1. http://eclipse-cs.sourceforge.net/. Accessed 2 Sept 2013

  7. Gdata Java Client v1.4.7.1. https://code.google.com/p/gdata-java-client/. Accessed 8 July 2013

  8. Guava v15. https://code.google.com/p/guava-libraries/. Accessed 8 Sept 2013

  9. Hibernate v4.2.7. http://www.hibernate.org. Accessed 2 Sept 2013

  10. JaCoCo v0.6.3. http://www.eclemma.org/jacoco/. Accessed 24 Oct 2013

  11. Java Machine Learning Libraryr v0.1.7. http://java-ml.sourceforge.net/. Accessed 9 Sept 2013

  12. Java Wikipedia Library v0.9.2. https://code.google.com/p/jwpl/. Accessed 17 July 2013

  13. Joda Time v2.0. http://joda-time.sourceforge.net. Accessed 22 Feb 2013

  14. Pitest v0.3.1. http://pitest.org. Accessed 24 Oct 2013

  15. Randoop v1.3.3. http://code.google.com/p/randoop/. Accessed 22 Feb 2013

  16. Scribe v1.3.5. https://github.com/fernandezpablo85/scribe-java. Accessed 3 Sept 2013

  17. sqlsheet v6.4. https://code.google.com/p/sqlsheet. Accessed 22 Feb 2013

  18. Twitter4j v3.0.4. http://twitter4j.org/en/. Accessed 3 Sept 2013

  19. Andrews, J., Menzies, T., Li, F.: Genetic algorithms for randomized unit testing. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 37(1), 80–94 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Basili, V.R., Shull, F., Lanubile, F.: Building knowledge through families of experiments. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 25(4), 456–473 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Daniel, B., Boshernitsan, M.: Predicting effectiveness of automatic testing tools. In: 23rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering 2008, ASE 2008, pp. 363–366 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fraser, G., Zeller, A.: Mutation-driven generation of unit tests and oracles. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng 38(2), 278–292 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fraser, G., Arcuri, A.: Sound empirical evidence in software testing. In: Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2012, pp. 178–188. IEEE Press, Piscataway (2012). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2337223.2337245

  24. Fraser, G., Arcuri, A.: Evosuite at the SBST 2013 tool competition. In: 2013 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW), pp. 406–409, March 2013

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fraser, G., Arcuri, A.: Evosuite at the second unit testing tool competition. In: Future Internet Testing (FITTEST) Workshop (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Harman, M., Jia, Y., Langdon, W.B.: Strong higher order mutation-based test data generation. In: Gyimóthy, T., Zeller, A. (eds.) SIGSOFT FSE. pp. 212–222. ACM (2011). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2025113.2025144

  27. Kitchenham, B., Dyba, T., Jorgensen, M.: Evidence-based software engineering. In: Proceedings of ICSE, pp. 273–281. IEEE (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kitchenham, B.A., Pfleeger, S.L., Pickard, L.M., Jones, P.W., Hoaglin, D.C., Emam, K.E., Rosenberg, J.: Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 28(8), 721–734 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nistor, A., Luo, Q., Pradel, M., Gross, T., Marinov, D.: Ballerina: Automatic generation and clustering of efficient random unit tests for multithreaded code. In: 2012 34th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 727–737, June 2012

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pacheco, C., Ernst, M.D.: Randoop: feedback-directed random testing for java. In: Companion to the 22nd ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems and Applications Companion, OOPSLA ’07, pp. 815–816. ACM, New York (2007). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1297846.1297902

  31. Pacheco, C., Lahiri, S.K., Ball, T.: Finding errors in.net with feedback-directed random testing. In: Proceedings of the 2008 International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, ISSTA ’08, pp. 87–96. ACM, New York (2008). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1390630.1390643

  32. Prasetya, I.: Measuring T2 against SBST 2013 benchmark suite. In: 2013 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW), pp. 410–413, March 2013

    Google Scholar 

  33. Prasetya, I.: T3, a combinator-based random testing tool for java: benchmarking. In: Future Internet Testing (FITTEST) Workshop (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schuler, D., Zeller, A.: Javalanche: efficient mutation testing for java. In: ESEC/FSE ’09: Proceedings of the 7th Joint Meeting of the European Software Engineering Conference and the ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, pp. 297–298, Aug 2009

    Google Scholar 

  35. Schuler, D., Zeller, A.: (un-)covering equivalent mutants. In: ICST ’10: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation, pp. 45–54. IEEE Computer Society, Apr 2010

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sim, S., Easterbrook, S., Holt, R.: Using benchmarking to advance research: a challenge to software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003, pp. 74–83, May 2003

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tonella, P., Torchiano, M., Du Bois, B., Systä, T.: Empirical studies in reverse engineering: state of the art and future trends. Empirical Softw. Engg. 12(5), 551–571 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Vegas, S., Basili, V.: A characterisation schema for software testing techniques. Empirical Softw. Engg. 10(4), 437–466 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is funded by the European Project with the acronym FITTEST (Future Internet Testing) and contract number (ICT-257574). We would also like to thank Arthur Baars for his initial efforts in setting up the benchmark architecture.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Bauersfeld .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bauersfeld, S., Vos, T.E.J., Lakhotia, K. (2014). Unit Testing Tool Competitions – Lessons Learned. In: Vos, T., Lakhotia, K., Bauersfeld, S. (eds) Future Internet Testing. FITTEST 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8432. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07785-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07785-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07784-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07785-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics