Skip to main content

Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography Lesion Morphology and a Phantom for Performance Evaluation

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 8539))

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM), promises to improve diagnostic accuracy as an adjunct to mammography, especially for women with dense breasts. Here we review 98 enhancing lesions from a previously published dual-energy CEDM study of 120 women to identify enhancing lesion morphologies and to characterize their sizes and margins as detected in CEDM. We have designed a phantom based on these clinical data that incorporates realistic enhancing lesion morphologies for CEDM evaluation. The phantom includes elements of four lesion types observed in CEDM, which broadly follow analogous categories developed from the MRI Breast Imaging, Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon. This phantom uses solid iodinated plastic features with accurate iodine concentrations for detection sensitivity experiments. We believe that comparisons of the lesion morphologies through quantitative metrics and reader studies will be useful to test lesion classification and discrimination tasks that can contribute to CEDM performance evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fallenberg, E.M., Dromain, C., Diekmann, F., Engelken, F., Krohn, M., Singh, J.M., Ingold-Heppner, B., Winzer, K.J., Bick, U., Renz, D.M.: Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: Initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size. Eur. Radiol. (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jochelson, M.S., Dershaw, D.D., Sung, J.S., Heerdt, A.S., Thornton, C., Moskowitz, C.S., Ferrara, J., Morris, E.A.: Bilateral Contrast-enhanced Dual-Energy Digital Mammography: Feasibility and Comparison with Conventional Digital Mammography and MR Imaging in Women with Known Breast Carcinoma. Radiology 266, 743–751 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lewin, J.M., Isaacs, P.K., Vance, V., Larke, F.J.: Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility. Radiology 229, 261–268 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dromain, C., Thibault, F., Muller, S., Rimareix, F., Delaloge, S., Tardivon, A., Balleyguier, C.: Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results. Eur. Radiol. 21, 565–574 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Leithner, R., Knogler, T., Homolka, P.: Development and production of a prototype iodine contrast phantom for CEDEM. Phys. Med. Biol. 35, N25–N35 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liberman, L., Morris, E.A., Lee, M.J.-Y., Kaplan, J.B., LaTrenta, L.R., Menell, J.H., Abramson, A.F., Dashnaw, S.M., Ballon, D.J., Dershaw, D.D.: Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. Am. J. Roentgenol. 179, 171–178 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Macura, K.J., Ouwerkerk, R., Jacobs, M.A., Bluemke, D.A.: Patterns of enhancement on breast MR images: interpretation and imaging pitfalls. Radiographics 26, 1719–1734 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jong, R.A., Yaffe, M.J., Skarpathiotakis, M., Shumak, R.S., Danjoux, N.M., Gunesekara, A.: Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience. Radiology 228, 842–850 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hill, M.L., Mainprize, J.G., Mawdsley, G.E., Yaffe, M.J.: A solid iodinated phantom material for use in tomographic x-ray imaging. Med. Phys. 36, 4409–4420 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mainprize, J.G., Hunt, D.C., Yaffe, M.J.: Direct conversion detectors: The effect of incomplete charge collection on detective quantum efficiency. Med. Phys. 29, 976 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Miyajima, S., Imagawa, K., Matsumoto, M.: CdZnTe detector in diagnostic x-ray spectroscopy. Med. Phys. 29, 1421 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Puong, S., Bouchevreau, X., Patoureaux, F., Iordache, R., Muller, S.: Dual-energy contrast enhanced digital mammography using a new approach for breast tissue canceling. In: Proc. SPIE. vol. 6510, 65102H (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hill, M.L. et al. (2014). Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography Lesion Morphology and a Phantom for Performance Evaluation. In: Fujita, H., Hara, T., Muramatsu, C. (eds) Breast Imaging. IWDM 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8539. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07887-8_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07887-8_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07886-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07887-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics