Skip to main content

Abstract

This work focuses on label ranking, a particular task of preference learning, wherein the problem is to learn a mapping from instances to rankings over a finite set of labels. This paper discusses and proposes alternative reduction techniques that decompose the original problem into binary classification related to pairs of labels and that can take into account label correlation during the learning process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fürnkranz, J., Hüllermeier, E. (eds.): Preference Learning. Springer (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gurrieri, M., Siebert, X., Fortemps, P., Greco, S., Słowiński, R.: Label Ranking: A New Rule-Based Label Ranking Method. In: Greco, S., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Coletti, G., Fedrizzi, M., Matarazzo, B., Yager, R.R. (eds.) IPMU 2012, Part I. CCIS, vol. 297, pp. 613–623. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Gurrieri, M., Siebert, X., Fortemps, P., Slowinski, R., Greco, S.: Reduction from Label Ranking to Binary Classification. In: DA2PL 2012 From Multiple Criteria Decision Aid to Preference Learning, pp. 3–13. UMONS (Université de Mons), Mons (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Har-Peled, S., Roth, D., Zimak, D.: Constraint classification for multiclass classificatin and ranking. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 785–792 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hüllermeier, E., Fürnkranz, J., Cheng, W., Brinker, K.: Label Ranking by learning pairwise preference. Artif. Intell. 172(16-17), 1897–1916 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng, W., Hühn, J., Hüllermeier, E.: Decision Tree and Instance-Based Learning for Labele Ranking. In: Proc. ICML 2009, International Conference on Machine Learning, Montreal, Canada (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Read, J., Pfahringer, B., Holmes, G., Frank, E.: Classifier chains for multi-label classification. Machine Learning 85(3), 333–359 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Gärtner, T., Vembu, S.: Label Ranking Algorithms: A Survey. In: Fürnkranz, J., Hüllermeier, E. (eds.) Preference Learning. Springer (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dekel, O., Manning, C.D., Singer, Y.: Log-linear models for label ranking. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 16 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Elisseeff, A., Weston, J.: A kernel method for multi-labelled classification. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 14 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bouyssou, D.: Ranking methods based on valued preference relations: A characterization of the net flow method. European Journal of Operational Research 60(1), 61–67 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Demšar, J.: Statistical Comparisons of Classifiers over Multiple Data Sets. Journal of Machine Learning Research 7, 1–30 (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheng, W., Hüllermeier, E., Dembczynski, K.J.: Bayes optimal multilabel classification via probabilistic classifier chains. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2010), pp. 279–286 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dwork, C., Kumar, R., Naor, M., Sivakumar, D.: Rank aggregation revisited (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schalekamp, F., van Zuylen, A.: Rank Aggregation: Together We’re Strong. In: ALENEX, pp. 38–51 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. de Sá, C.R., Soares, C., Jorge, A.M., Azevedo, P., Costa, J.: Mining Association Rules for Label Ranking. In: Huang, J.Z., Cao, L., Srivastava, J. (eds.) PAKDD 2011, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6635, pp. 432–443. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Diaconis, P., Graham, R.L.: Spearman’s footrule as a measure of disarray. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological) 39, 262–268 (1977)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Hung, M.S., Hu, M.Y., Shanker, M.S., Patuwo, B.E.: Estimating posterior probabilities in classification problems with neural networks. International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Organizations 1(1), 49–60 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gurrieri, M., Fortemps, P., Siebert, X. (2014). Alternative Decomposition Techniques for Label Ranking. In: Laurent, A., Strauss, O., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Yager, R.R. (eds) Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems. IPMU 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 443. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08855-6_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08855-6_47

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08854-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08855-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics