Skip to main content

An Approach to Creating a Personified Job Description of a Designer in Designing a Family of Software Intensive Systems

  • Conference paper
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2014 (ICCSA 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8583))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This study is bound with rational management of workforces that are used in the design company for developing the software intensive systems. The approach applied in the study is based on modeling the experience of any designer of the company team in the form of a personified job description which is bound with precedents’ models used in solutions of all appointed tasks. Question-answer reflections of tasks being solved by the designer on models of precedents define the specificity of the suggested approach. The personified job description is built on the base of measured competencies registered in the Experience Base. The used realization of the approach facilitates increasing the efficiency of designing the family of software intensive systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Capability Maturity Model Integrated for Development, Version 1.3 (2010), http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/10tr033.pdf

  2. Curtis, B.: People Capability Maturity Model (P-CMM) Version 2.0. Curtis, B., Hefley, B., Miller, S. (eds.) Technical Report CMU/SEI-2009-TR-003 P (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. El Emam, K., Koru, A.G.: A Replicated Survey of IT Software Project Failures. IEEE Software 25(5), 84–90 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jacobson, I., Ng, P.-W., McMahon, P., Spence, I., Lidman, S.: The Essence of Software Engineering: The SEMAT Kernel. Queue (10) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sosnin, P.: Experiential Human-Computer Interaction in Collaborative Designing of Software Intensive Systems. In: Proc.of the 11th International conference on Software Methedology and Technics (SoMeT), pp. 180–197 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Managing for the sustained success of an organization – A quality management, ISO 9004:2009 (2009), http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=41014

  7. Robertson, K.: Project Management Maturity Model, http://www.klr.com/white_papers/pdfs/pm_maturity_model.pdf

  8. Roglinger, M., Poppelbuth, J., Becker, J.: Maturity models in business process management. Business Process Management 18(2), 328–346 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lahrmann, G., Marx, F., Winter, R., Wortmann, F.: Business Intelligence Maturity Models: An Overview, www.alexandria.unisg.ch/Publikationen/72444/L-en

  10. Enterprise Architecture Maturity Model, http://www.nascio.org/publications/documents/nascio-eamm.pdf

  11. Delamare Le Deist, F., Winterton, J.: What is competence? Human Resource Development International 8(1), 17–36 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Systems Engineering Competency Framework (2010), http://www.incoseonline.org.uk/Documents/zGuides/Z6_Competency_WEB.pdf

  13. Von Rosing, M., Moshiri, S., Gräslund, K., Rosenberg, A.: Competency Maturity Model Wheel, http://www.valueteam.biz/downloads/model_cmm_wheel.pdf

  14. Bass, L., Clements, P., Kazman, R., Klein, M.: Models for Evaluating and Improving Architecture Competence, Technical Report, CMU/SEI-2008-TR-006, ESC-TR-2008-006 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Borges, P., Monteiro, P., Machado, R.J.: Mapping RUP roles to small software development teams. In: Biffl, S., Winkler, D., Bergsmann, J. (eds.) SWQD 2012. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 94, pp. 59–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Basili, V.R., Rombach, H.D., Schneider, K., Kitchenham, B., Pfahl, D., Selby, R.W. (eds.): Empirical Software Engineering Issues. LNCS, vol. 4336. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Henninger, S.: Tool Support for Experience-based Software Development Methodologies. Advances in Computers 59, 29–82 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sosnin, P.: Role “Intellectual Processor” in Conceptual Designing of Software Intensive Systems. In: Murgante, B., Misra, S., Carlini, M., Torre, C.M., Nguyen, H.-Q., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O., Gervasi, O. (eds.) ICCSA 2013, Part III. LNCS, vol. 7973, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sosnin, P., Pertsev, A. (2014). An Approach to Creating a Personified Job Description of a Designer in Designing a Family of Software Intensive Systems. In: Murgante, B., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2014. ICCSA 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8583. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09156-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09156-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09155-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09156-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics