Abstract
One of the main goals of Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) is the manipulation of models as software artifacts. Model execution is in particular a means to substitute models for code. Precisely, if models of a dedicated Domain-Specific Modeling Language (DSML) are interpreted through an execution engine, then this DSML is called interpreted-DSML (i-DSML for short). The possibility of extending i-DSML to adapt models directly during their execution, allows the building of adaptable i-DSML. In this article, we demonstrate that specializing adaptable i-DSML leads to the potential definition of accurate adaptation policies. Domain-specificities are the key factors to identify adaptations that really make sense. In effect, we introduce the concept of family as a mean to encapsulate adaptation operations that are attached to a particular domain. Families can be specialized with the special purpose of defining a hierarchy of adaptation contexts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) Version 1.2. Technical report (January 2009)
Blair, G.S., Bencomo, N., France, R.B.: Models@run.time. IEEE Computer 42(10), 22–27 (2009)
Breton, E., Bézivin, J.: Towards an understanding of model executability. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS 2001). ACM (2001)
Cariou, E., Ballagny, C., Feugas, A., Barbier, F.: Contracts for Model Execution Verification. In: France, R.B., Kuester, J.M., Bordbar, B., Paige, R.F. (eds.) ECMFA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6698, pp. 3–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Cariou, E., Le Goaer, O., Barbier, F.: Model Execution Adaptation? In: 7th International Workshop on Models@run.time (MRT 2012) at MoDELS 2012. ACM Digital Library (2012)
Cariou, E., Le Goaer, O., Barbier, F., Pierre, S.: Characterization of Adaptable Interpreted-DSML. In: Van Gorp, P., Ritter, T., Rose, L.M. (eds.) ECMFA 2013. LNCS, vol. 7949, pp. 37–53. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Cheng, S.-W., Garlan, D., Schmerl, B.R., Sousa, J.A.P., Spitnagel, B., Steenkiste, P.: Using Architectural Style As a Basis for System Self-repair. In: Proceedings of the IFIP 17th World Computer Congress - TC2 Stream 3rd IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture: System Design, Development and Maintenance, WICSA 3, pp. 45–59. Kluwer, B.V. (2002)
Clarke, P.J., Wu, Y., Allen, A.A., Hernandez, F., Allison, M., France, R.: Formal and Practical Aspects of Domain-Specific Languages: Recent Developments. In: Towards Dynamic Semantics for Synthesizing Interpreted DSMLs, ch. 9. IGI Global (2013)
Combemale, B., Crégut, X., Pantel, M.: A Design Pattern to Build Executable DSMLs and associated V&V tools. In: The 19th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC 2012). IEEE (2012)
Garlan, D., Allen, R., Ockerbloom, J.: Exploiting Style in Architectural Design Environments. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 19(5), 175–188 (1994)
Guy, C., Combemale, B., Derrien, S., Steel, J.R.H., Jézéquel, J.-M.: On Model Subtyping. In: Vallecillo, A., Tolvanen, J.-P., Kindler, E., Störrle, H., Kolovos, D. (eds.) ECMFA 2012. LNCS, vol. 7349, pp. 400–415. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Lehmann, G., Blumendorf, M., Trollmann, F., Albayrak, S.: Meta-Modeling Runtime Models. In: Dingel, J., Solberg, A. (eds.) MODELS 2010 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 6627, pp. 209–223. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
OMG. Software Process Engineering Metamodell SPEM 2.0 OMG Draft Adopted Specification. Technical report. OMG (2006)
Oreizy, P., Medvidovic, N., Taylor, R.N.: Runtime Software Adaptation: Framework, Approaches, and Styles. In: Companion of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE Companion 2008), pp. 899–910. ACM (2008)
Salehie, M., Tahvildari, L.: Self-adaptive software: Landscape and research challenges. ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst. 14, 14:1–14:42 (2009)
Shaw, M.: Comparing architectural design styles. IEEE Software 12(6), 27–41 (1995)
Shaw, M., Clements, P.: A Field Guide to Boxology: Preliminary Classification of Architectural Styles for Software Systems. In: The Twenty-First Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC 1997), pp. 6–13. IEEE Computer Society (1997)
Steel, J., Jézéquel, J.-M.: On model typing. Software and System Modeling 6(4), 401–413 (2007)
Sun, W., Combemale, B., Derrien, S., France, R.B.: Using Model Types to Support Contract-Aware Model Substitutability. In: Van Gorp, P., Ritter, T., Rose, L.M. (eds.) ECMFA 2013. LNCS, vol. 7949, pp. 118–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pierre, S., Cariou, E., Le Goaer, O., Barbier, F. (2014). A Family-Based Framework for i-DSML Adaptation. In: Cabot, J., Rubin, J. (eds) Modelling Foundations and Applications. ECMFA 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8569. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09195-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09195-2_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09194-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09195-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)