Skip to main content

Comparison of EM-Based Algorithms and Image Segmentation Evaluation

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Computing Methodologies (ICIC 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8589))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm is used in statistics for finding maximum likelihood estimates of parameters in probabilistic models, where the model depends on unobserved latent variables. The idea behind the EM algorithm is intuitive and natural, which makes it applicable to a variety of problems. However, the EM algorithm does not guarantee convergence to the global maximum when there are multiple local maxima. In this paper, a random swap EM (RSEM) algorithm is introduced and compared to other variants of the EM algorithms. The variants are then applied to color image segmentation. In addition, a cluster validity criterion is proposed for evaluating the segmentation results from the EM variants. The purpose of this paper is to compare the characteristics of the variants with split and merge strategies and stochastic ways and their performance in color image segmentation. The experimental results indicate that the introduced RSEM performs better with simpler implementation than the other variants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Biernacki, G., Celeux, C., Govaert, G.: Choosing Starting Values for The EM Algorithm for Getting The Highest Likelihood in Multivariate Gaussian Mixture Models. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 41, 561–575 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Karlis, B.D., Xekalaki, E.: Choosing Initial Values for The EM Algorithm for Finite Mixtures. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 41, 577–590 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Udea, N., Nakano, R., Gharhamani, Z., Hinton, G.: SMEM Algorithm for Mixture Models. Neural Computation 12, 2109–2128 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Verbeek, J., Vlassis, N., Krose, B.: Efficient Greedy Learning of Gaussian Mixture Models. Neural Computation 15(12), 469–485 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Wei, G.G.G., Tanner, M.A.: A Monte Carlo Implementation of The EM Algorithm and The Poor Man’s Data Augmentation Algorithms. Journal of the American Statistical Association 85, 699–704 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Richardson, S., Green, P.J.: On Bayesian Analysis of Mixtures with An Unknown Number of Components. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 59(4), 731–792 (2002)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Frayley, C., Raftery, A.: How Many Clusters? Which Clustering Method? Answers Via Model-based Cluster Analysis. Technical Report no. 329, Department of Statistics, University of Washington (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rissanen, J.: Stochastic complexity in statistical inquiry. World Scientific, Singapore (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Mclachlan, G., Krishnan, T.: The EM Algorithm and Extensions. John Wiley & Sons (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kaukoranta, T., Fränti, P., Nevalainen, O.: Iterative splitand-merge algorithm for vector quantization codebook generation. Optical Engineering 37(10), 2726–2732 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pelleg, D., Moore, A.: X-means: Extending K-means with efficient estimation of the number of clusters. In: Proceeding of the 17th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, pp. 727–734 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, Z., Chen, C., Sun, J., Chan, K.: EM algorithms for Gaussian mixtures with split-and-merge operation. Pattern Recognition 36(9), 1973–1983 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao, Q., Xu, M., Fränti, P.: Sum-of-squares based cluster validity index and significance analysis. In: Kolehmainen, M., Toivanen, P., Beliczynski, B. (eds.) ICANNGA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5495, pp. 313–322. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Minagawa, A., Tagawa, N., Tanaka, T.: SMEM algorithm is not fully compatible with maximum-likelihood framework. Neural Computation 14(6), 1261–1266 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Niu, M., Zhao, Q., Li, H. (2014). Comparison of EM-Based Algorithms and Image Segmentation Evaluation. In: Huang, DS., Jo, KH., Wang, L. (eds) Intelligent Computing Methodologies. ICIC 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8589. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09339-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09339-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09338-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09339-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics