Skip to main content

Tweeting Politicians: An Analysis of the Usage of a Micro Blogging System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 190))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Political communication via social media is getting more and more important. Besides social websites like Facebook and the video platforms like Youtube, microblogging systems have been increasingly used by politicians as communication tools. Since its introduction in 2007, Twitter has become the leading microblogging system. Today it is used by common people and any kind of celebrity whether they are in the show business, in sports or in any other domain. Twitter is also used by politicians to communicate with their voters. Hence, the objective of our paper is to analyze how elected politicians, i. e. members of parliaments, exploit Twitter in three different countries - namely Australia, Germany and the U.S. For our study, we collected data from more than 1,400 politicians of these countries, in particular their almost one million tweets. Our research gives an insight into the usage of Twitter in politics and discloses areas where the usage of Twitter by parliamentarians, differs between Australia, Germany and the U.S.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Filler words like “is”, “the”, ... are excluded.

References

  1. Adamic, L. A., Glance, N.: The political Blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery, LinkKDD ’05, pp. 36–43. ACM, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adar, E., Adamic, L.A.: Tracking information epidemics in blogspace. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, WI ’05, pp. 207–214. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Agarwal, N., Liu, H., Tang, L., Yu, P.S.: Identifying the influential bloggers in a community. In: Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM ’08, pp. 207–218. ACM, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Asur, S., Huberman, B.A., Syabo, G., Wang, C.: Trends in social media: persistence and decay. In: 5th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barnett, G.A.: Encyclopedia of Social Networks. SAGE Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bateman, P.J., Pike, J.C., Butler, B.S.: To disclose or not: publicness in social networking sites. Inf. Technol. People 24(1), 78–100 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bosco, C., Patti, V., Bolioli, A.: Developing corpora for sentiment analysis and opinion mining: the case of irony and senti-tut. IEEE Intelligent Systems 99(PrePrints), 1 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cha, M., Haddadi, M., Benevenuto, F., Gummadi, K.P.: Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower fallacy. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Social informatics, SocInfo’10, pp. 216–231. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng, A., Evans, M., Singh, H.: Inside Twitter: An in-depth look inside the Twitter world, June 2009. http://www.sysomos.com/insidetwitter/. Accessed 03 Aug 2013

  10. Chung, J.E., Mustafaraj, E.: Can collective sentiment expressed on twitter predict political elections? In: Burgard, W., Roth, D. (eds.) AAAI. AAAI Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Golbeck, J., Grimes, J.M., Rogers, A.: Twitter use by the U.S. congress. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 61(8), 1612–1621 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Henderson, B.: The product portfolio. In: BCG Perspectives, vol. 66. Boston Consulting Group (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jansen, B.J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., Chowdury, A.: Twitter power: tweets as electronic word of mouth. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 60(11), 2169–2188 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Light, B., McGrath, K.: Ethics and social networking sites: a disclosive analysis of Facebook. Inf. Technol. People 23(4), 290–311 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ou, C.X., Davison, R.M., Zhong, X., Liang, Y.: Empowering employees through instant messaging. Inf. Technol. People 23(2), 193–211 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Panteli, N., Yan, L., Chamakiotis, P.: Writing to the unknown: bloggers and the presence of backpackers. Inf. Technol. People 24(4), 362–377 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rainie, L., Smith, A., Lehman-Schlozman, K., Brady, H., Verba, S.: Social media and political engagement, October 2012, http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Political-engagement.aspx. Accessed 22 Aug 2013

  18. Reuters, T.: Journal Citation Reports - Quick Reference Card, January 2012. http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/mgr/jcr-qrg.pdf. Accessed 17 Jun 2013

  19. Reyes, A., Rosso, P., Veale, T.: A multidimensional approach for detecting irony in twitter. Lang. Resour. Eval. 47(1), 239–268 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sang, E.T.K., Bos, J.: Predicting the 2011 dutch senate election results with twitter. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Semantic Analysis in Social Media, pp. 53–60. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shirazi, F.: Social media and the social movements in the Middle East and North Africa: a critical discource analysis. Inf. Technol. People 26(1), 28–49 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith, K. N.: Social Media and Political Campaigns. Honors thesis projects, University of Tennessee (2011). http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/1470. Accessed 15 Aug 2013

  23. Twitter: Twitter API Documentation, January 2012. https://dev.twitter.com/. Accessed 10 Sept 2013

  24. Twitter: The top 100 most followed on Twitter (2013). http://twittercounter.com/pages/100. Accessed 09 Sept 2013

  25. Wattal, S., Schuff, D., Mandviwalla, M., Williams, C.B.: Web 2.0 and politics: the 2008 US presidential election and an e-politics research agenda. MIS Q. 34(4), 669–688 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wiredu, G.O.: Information systems innovation in public organisations: an institutional perspective. Inf. Technol. People 25(2), 188–206 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gil de Zuniga, H., Jung, N., Valenzuela, S.: Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. J. Comput.-Mediated Commun. 17(3), 319–336 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Roth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Roth, M., Peters, G., Seruga, J. (2014). Tweeting Politicians: An Analysis of the Usage of a Micro Blogging System. In: Hammoudi, S., Cordeiro, J., Maciaszek, L., Filipe, J. (eds) Enterprise Information Systems. ICEIS 2013. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 190. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09492-2_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09492-2_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09491-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09492-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics