Skip to main content

Recent Developments in Quantum Algorithms and Complexity

  • Conference paper
Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems (DCFS 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8614))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 580 Accesses

Abstract

We survey several recent developments in quantum algorithms and complexity:

  • Reichardt’s characterization of quantum query algorithms via span programs [15];

  • New bounds on the number of queries that are necessary for simulating a quantum algorithm that makes a very small number of queries [2];

  • Exact quantum algorithms with superlinear advantage over the best classical algorithm [4].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aaronson, S.: BQP and the Polynomial Hierarchy. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing (STOC 2010), pp. 141–150 (2010); Also arXiv:0910.4698

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aaronson, S., Ambainis, A.: Forrelation: a problem capturing the power of quantum algorithms. Manuscript in preparation

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ambainis, A.: Quantum Lower Bounds by Quantum Arguments. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 64(4), 750–767 (2002) Also quant-ph/0002066

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ambainis, A.: Superlinear advantage for exact quantum algorithms. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing (STOC 2013), pp. 891–890 (2013); Also arXiv:1211.0721

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ambainis, A., Gruska, J., Zheng, S.: Exact query complexity of some special classes of Boolean functions. arXiv:1404.1684

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ambainis, A., Iraids, J., Smotrovs, J.: Exact Quantum Query Complexity of EXACT and THRESHOLD. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2013), pp. 263–269 (2013); Also arXiv:1302.1235

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ambainis, A., Childs, A., Reichardt, B., Spalek, R., Zhang, S.: Any AND-OR formula of size N can be evaluated in time N 1/2 + o(1) on a quantum computer. SIAM Journal on Computing 39(6), 2513–2530 (2010); Also FOCS 2007

    Google Scholar 

  8. Belovs, A.: Span programs for functions with constant-sized 1-certificates: extended abstract. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing (STOC 2012), pp. 77–84 (2012); Also arXiv:1103.0842

    Google Scholar 

  9. Belovs, A.: Learning-Graph-Based Quantum Algorithm for k-Distinctness. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2012), pp. 207–216 (2012); Also arXiv:1205.1534

    Google Scholar 

  10. Buhrman, H., de Wolf, R.: Complexity measures and decision tree complexity: a survey. Theoretical Computer Science 288(1), 21–43 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., Gutman, S.: A Quantum Algorithm for the Hamiltonian NAND Tree. Theory of Computing 4(1), 169–190 (2008); Also quant-ph/0702144

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grover, L.: A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing (STOC 1996), pp. 212–219 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Høyer, P., Lee, T., Špalek, R.: Negative weights make adversaries stronger. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing (STOC 2007), pp. 526–535 (2007); Also quant-ph/0611054

    Google Scholar 

  14. Magniez, F., Nayak, A., Santha, M., Sherman, J., Tardos, G., Xiao, D.: Improved bounds for the randomized decision tree complexity of recursive majority. arXiv:1309.7565. Earlier version: ICALP 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reichardt, B.: Span programs and quantum query complexity: The general adversary bound is nearly tight for every boolean function. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2009), pp. 544–551 (2009); Also arXiv:0904.2759

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reichardt, B.: Reflections for quantum query algorithms. In: Proceedings of SIAM-ACM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA 2011), pp. 560–569 (2011); Also arXiv:1005.1601

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reichardt, B., Špalek, R.: Span-Program-Based Quantum Algorithm for Evaluating Formulas. Theory of Computing 8(1), 291–319 (2012); Also arXiv:0710.2630

    Google Scholar 

  18. Simon, D.: On the Power of Quantum Computation. SIAM Journal on Computing 26(5), 1474–1483 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Shor, P.: Algorithms for Quantum Computation: Discrete Logarithms and Factoring. SIAM Journal on Computing 26(5), 1484–1509 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ambainis, A. (2014). Recent Developments in Quantum Algorithms and Complexity. In: Jürgensen, H., Karhumäki, J., Okhotin, A. (eds) Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems. DCFS 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8614. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09704-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09704-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09703-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09704-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics