Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Fresh Look at Codification Approaches for SAKM: A Systematic Literature Review

  • Conference paper
Software Architecture (ECSA 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 8627))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The last 10 years have seen a rise of approaches for Software Architecture Knowledge Management (SAKM), with a focus on codification of architecture knowledge. Still there is no common meta-model for describing architectural knowledge nor is there a common terminology for the main concepts of such a model. While this might lead to the question whether such a common meta-model is even possible, it is certainly desirable. We decided to tackle this question based on the results of 10 years of research in this area. As part of a systematic literature survey we analyzed and compared model-based approaches for SAKM. Specifically we analyzed the models of SAKM approaches with the highest-rated evidence for different knowledge management activities like capturing, maintaining, reuse, sharing, and using. As a result we identified important aims and elements of proven SAKM approaches, which could be used as a driver for the next generation of AK codification approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bosch, J.: Software architecture: The next step. In: Oquendo, F., Warboys, B.C., Morrison, R. (eds.) EWSA 2004. LNCS, vol. 3047, pp. 194–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Tyree, J., Akerman, A.: Architecture decisions: Demystifying architecture. IEEE Software 22(2), 19–27 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Weinreich, R., Buchgeher, G.: Towards supporting the software architecture life cycle. Journal of Systems and Software 85(3), 546–561 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kitchenham, B.A., Charters, S.: Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical report, Software Engineering Group, School of Computer Science and Mathematics, Keele University, UK, and Department of Computer Science, University of Durham, Durham, UK (July 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Davenport, T.H., Prusak, L.: Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alavi, M., Leidner, D.E.: Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 107–136 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fleiss, J.L.: Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin 76(5), 378 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Landis, J.R., Koch, G.G.: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1), 159–174 (1977)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Goodman, L.A.: Snowball sampling. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 148–170 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Weyns, D., Ahmad, T.: Claims and evidence for architecture-based self-adaptation: A systematic literature review. In: Drira, K. (ed.) ECSA 2013. LNCS, vol. 7957, pp. 249–265. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, Z., Liang, P., Avgeriou, P.: Application of knowledge-based approaches in software architecture: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Babar, M.A., Northway, A., Gorton, I., Heuer, P., Nguyen, T.: Introducing tool support for managing architectural knowledge: An experience report. In: 15th Conference on the Engineering of Computer Based Systems, pp. 105–113. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Babar, M.A., Capilla, R.: Capturing and using quality attributes knowledge in software architecture evaluation process. In: First International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge, MARK 2008, pp. 53–62. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. van Heesch, U., Avgeriou, P., Hilliard, R.: A documentation framework for architecture decisions. Journal of Systems and Software 85(4), 795–820 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. van Heesch, U., Avgeriou, P., Tang, A.: Does decision documentation help junior designers rationalize their decisions?-a comparative multiple-case study. Journal of Systems and Software (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. van Heesch, U., Avgeriou, P., Hilliard, R.: Forces on architecture decisions-a viewpoint. In: 2012 Joint Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA) and European Conference on Software Architecture (ECSA), pp. 101–110. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cui, X., Sun, Y., Xiao, S., Mei, H.: Architecture design for the large-scale software-intensive systems: A decision-oriented approach and the experience. In: 2009 14th IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems, pp. 30–39. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cui, X., Sun, Y., Mei, H.: Towards automated solution synthesis and rationale capture in decision-centric architecture design. In: Seventh Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, pp. 221–230. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jansen, A., Avgeriou, P., van der Ven, J.S.: Enriching software architecture documentation. Journal of Systems and Software 82(8), 1232–1248 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jansen, A., de Vries, T., Avgeriou, P., van Veelen, M.: Sharing the architectural knowledge of quantitative analysis. In: Becker, S., Plasil, F., Reussner, R. (eds.) QoSA 2008. LNCS, vol. 5281, pp. 220–234. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Weinreich, R., Buchgeher, G.: Integrating requirements and design decisions in architecture representation. In: Babar, M.A., Gorton, I. (eds.) ECSA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6285, pp. 86–101. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Zimmermann, O., Gschwind, T., Küster, J., Leymann, F., Schuster, N.: Reusable architectural decision models for enterprise application development. In: Overhage, S., Ren, X.-M., Reussner, R., Stafford, J.A. (eds.) QoSA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4880, pp. 15–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. López, C., Codocedo, V., Astudillo, H., Cysneiros, L.M.: Bridging the gap between software architecture rationale formalisms and actual architecture documents: An ontology-driven approach. Science of Computer Programming 77(1), 66–80 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. López, C., Inostroza, P., Cysneiros, L.M., Astudillo, H.: Visualization and comparison of architecture rationale with semantic web technologies. Journal of Systems and Software 82(8), 1198–1210 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Che, M., Perry, D.E.: Scenario-based architectural design decisions documentation and evolution. In: 2011 18th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Engineering of Computer Based Systems, ECBS 2011, pp. 216–225. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kruchten, P.: An ontology of architectural design decisions in software intensive systems. In: 2nd Groningen Workshop on Software Variability, pp. 54–61 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Capilla, R., Nava, F., Dueas, J.C.: Modeling and documenting the evolution of architectural design decisions. In: Second Workshop on Sharing and Reusing Architectural Knowledge- Architecture, Rationale, and Design Intent, SHARK/ADI 2007: ICSE Workshops 2007, p. 9. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Easterbrook, S., Singer, J., Storey, M.A.A., Damian, D.: Selecting empirical methods for software engineering research. In: Guide to advanced empirical software engineering, pp. 285–311. Springer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tang, A., Avgeriou, P., Jansen, A., Capilla, R., Babar, M.A.: A comparative study of architecture knowledge management tools. Journal of Systems and Software 83(3), 352–370 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tofan, D., Galster, M., Avgeriou, P., Schuitema, W.: Past and future of software architectural decisions–a systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Shahin, M., Liang, P., Khayyambashi, M.R.R.: Architectural design decision: Existing models and tools. In: Joint Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, 2009 & European Conference on Software Architecture, WICSA/ECSA 2009, pp. 293–296. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria

    Rainer Weinreich & Iris Groher

Authors
  1. Rainer Weinreich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Iris Groher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Groningen, The Netherlands

    Paris Avgeriou

  2. Research Group Software Architecture, University of Vienna, Austria

    Uwe Zdun

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Weinreich, R., Groher, I. (2014). A Fresh Look at Codification Approaches for SAKM: A Systematic Literature Review. In: Avgeriou, P., Zdun, U. (eds) Software Architecture. ECSA 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8627. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09970-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09970-5_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09969-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09970-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation