Skip to main content

Multi-tenant Architecture Comparison

  • Conference paper
Software Architecture (ECSA 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 8627))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Software architects struggle to choose an adequate architectural style for multi-tenant software systems. Bad choices result in poor performance, low scalability, limited flexibility, and obstruct software evolution. We present a comparison of 12 Multi-Tenant Architecture (MTA) patterns that supports architects in choosing the most suitable architectural pattern, using 17 assessment criteria. Both patterns and criteria were evaluated by domain experts. Five architecture assessment rules of thumb are presented in the paper, aimed at making fast and efficient design decisions. The comparison provides architects with an effective method for selecting the applicable multi-tenant architecture pattern, saving them effort, time, and mitigating the effects of making wrong decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bezemer, C.P., Zaidman, A., Platzbeecker, B., Hurkmans, T., t Hart, A.: Enabling multi-tenancy: An industrial experience report. In: Proc. of the Int. Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chong, F., Carraro, G.: Architecture strategies for catching the long tail. Tech. rep., MSDN Library, Microsoft Corporation (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chong, F., Carraro, G., Wolter, R.: Multi-tenant data architecture. Tech. rep., MSDN Library, Microsoft Corporation (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. D’souza, A., Kabbedijk, J., Seo, D., Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S.: Software-as-a-service: Implications for business and technology in product software companies. In: Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), pp. 140–146 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Esfahani, N., Razavi, K., Malek, S.: Dealing with uncertainty in early software architecture. In: Proc. of the Int. Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, p. 21. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fowler, M.: Patterns of enterprise application architecture. Addison-Wesley Professional (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guo, C.J., Sun, W., Huang, Y., Wang, Z.H., Gao, B.: A framework for native multi-tenancy application development and management. In: Proc. of the Int. Conference on E-Commerce Technology (CEC), pp. 551–558. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kazman, R., Asundi, J., Klein, M.: Quantifying the costs and benefits of architectural decisions. In: Proc. of the Int. Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 297–306. IEEE Computer Society (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kwok, T., Nguyen, T., Lam, L.: A software as a service with multi-tenancy support for an electronic contract management application. In: Proc. of the Int. Conference on Services Computing (SCC), pp. 179–186 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lin, H., Sun, K., Zhao, S., Han, Y.: Feedback-control-based performance regulation for multi-tenant applications. In: Proc. of the Int. Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS), pp. 134–141. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pors, M., Blom, L., Kabbedijk, J., Jansen, S.: Sharing is caring - a decision support model for multi-tenant architectures. Tech. Rep. UU-CS-2013-015, Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sääksjärvi, M., Lassila, A., Nordström, H.: Evaluating the software as a service business model: From cpu time-sharing to online innovation sharing. In: Proce. of the Int. Conference e-Society, Qawra, Malta, pp. 27–30 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tsai, C.-H., Ruan, Y., Sahu, S., Shaikh, A., Shin, K.G.: Virtualization-based techniques for enabling multi-tenant management tools. In: Clemm, A., Granville, L.Z., Stadler, R. (eds.) DSOM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4785, pp. 171–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Yin, R.K.: Case study research: Design and methods, vol. 5. Sage (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kabbedijk, J., Pors, M., Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S. (2014). Multi-tenant Architecture Comparison. In: Avgeriou, P., Zdun, U. (eds) Software Architecture. ECSA 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8627. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09970-5_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09970-5_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09969-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09970-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics