Skip to main content

Safety Perspective for Supporting Architectural Design of Safety-Critical Systems

  • Conference paper
Software Architecture (ECSA 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 8627))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Various software architecture viewpoint approaches have been introduced to model the architecture views for stakeholder concerns. To address quality concerns in software architecture views, an important approach is to define architectural perspectives that include a collection of activities, tactics and guidelines that require consideration across a number of the architectural views. Several architectural perspectives have been defined for selected quality concerns. In this paper we propose the Safety Perspective that is dedicated to ensure that the safety concern is properly addressed in the architecture views. The proposed safety perspective can assist the system and software architects in designing, analyzing and communicating the decisions regarding safety concerns. We illustrate the safety perspective for a real industrial case study and discuss the lessons learned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chen, L., Avizienis, A.: N-Version Programming:A Fault-Tolerance Approach to Reliability of Software Operation. In: Fault Tolerant Computing, FTCS-8, pp. 3–9 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clements, P., Bachmann, F., Bass, L., Garlan, D., Ivers, J., Little, R., Nord, R., Stafford, J.: Documenting Software Architectures: Views and Beyond, 1st edn. Addison-Wesley (October 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. MIL-STD-882D, Standard Practice for System Safety, Department of Defense (2000) (retrieved January 22, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pataricza, A., Majzik, I., Huszerl, G., Várnai, G.: UML-based design and formal analysis of a safety-critical railway control software module. In: Proc. of Symposium Formal Methods for Railway Operation and ControlSystems (FORMS 2003), Budapest, pp. 125–132 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ramezani, R., Sedaghat, Y.: An Overview of Fault Tolerance Techniques for Real-Time Operating Systems. In: 3th International Conference on Computer and Knowledge Engineering, pp. 1–6 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rausand, M., Hoylan, A.: System Reliability Theory, Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications. Wiley, USA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rozanski, N., Woods, E.: Software Architecture Systems Working with Stakeholders Using Viewpoints and Perspectives, 1st edn. Addison-Wesley (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Software Safety Guide Book, NASA Technical Standard (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sojer, D., Christian, B., Knoll, A.: Deriving Fault-Detection Mechanisms from Safety Requirements. In: Computer Science- Research and Development, pp. 1–14. Springer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sözer, H., Tekinerdogan, B.: Introducing Recovery Style for Modeling and Analyzing System Recovery. In: 7th IEEE/IFIP Working Conference on Software Architecture, Vancouver, Canada, February 18-22, pp. 167–176 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sözer, H., Tekinerdogan, B., Aksit, M.: Optimizing Decomposition of Software Architecture for Local Recovery. Software Quality Journal 21(2), 203–240 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tekinerdogan, B., Sözer, H.: Defining Architectural Viewpoints for Quality Concerns. In: Crnkovic, I., Gruhn, V., Book, M. (eds.) ECSA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6903, pp. 26–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Wasilewski, M., Hasselbring, W., Nowotka, D.: Defining requirements on domain-specific languages in model-driven software engineering of safety-critical systems. In: Lecture Notes in Informatics Software Engineering Workshopband, pp. 467–482 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wu, W., Kelly, T.: Safety Tactics for Software Architecture Design. In: 28th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference, Hong Kong, pp. 368–375 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yu, G., Wei Xu, Z.: Model-Based Safety Test Automation of Safety-Critical Software. In: International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering, pp. 1–3 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gürbüz, H.G., Tekinerdogan, B., Pala Er, N. (2014). Safety Perspective for Supporting Architectural Design of Safety-Critical Systems. In: Avgeriou, P., Zdun, U. (eds) Software Architecture. ECSA 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8627. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09970-5_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09970-5_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09969-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09970-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics