Skip to main content

The Role of Design Rationale in the Ontology Matching Step during the Triplification of Relational Databases

  • Conference paper
Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8644))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1173 Accesses

Abstract

A common task when publishing relational databases as RDF datasets is to automatically define a vocabulary using the schema data, called Database Schema Ontology (DSO). To automatically reuse terms from existing vocabularies, Ontology Matching (OM) algorithms are used to generate recommendations for the DSO vocabulary. However, when a relational database is partially published due to privacy reasons, the DSO vocabulary loses contextual information and OM results in quite general recommendations, such as FOAF or Dublin Core vocabularies. To reduce the loss of context and to achieve recommendations better related to the DSO context, this paper proposes to use the design rationale captured during the publication of relational databases to RDF, represented as annotations. The case studies show that this annotation strategy helps find recommendations better related to the DSO context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Auer, S., Dietzold, S., Lehmann, J., Hellmann, S., Aumueller, D.: Triplify: light-weight linked data publication from relational databases. In: WWW 2009, pp. 621–630. ACM, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berardi, R., Breitman, K., Casanova, M.A., Lopes, G.R., de Medeiros, A.P.: StdTrip+K: Design Rationale in the RDB-to-RDF Process. In: Database and Expert Systems Applications, Prague, Czech Republic (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bizer, C. and Seaborne, A.: D2RQ-treating non-RDF databases as virtual RDF graphs. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Semantic Web Conference ISWC 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Breslin, J.G., Passant, A., Decker, S.: The Social Semantic Web, Inc. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cerbah, F.: Learning highly structured semantic repositories from relational databases: In: Bechhofer, S., Hauswirth, M., Hoffmann, J., Koubarakis, M. (eds.) ESWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5021, pp. 777–781. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cheatham, M., Hitzler, P.: String Similarity Metrics for Ontology Alignment. In: Alani, H., Kagal, L., Fokoue, A., Groth, P., Biemann, C., Parreira, J.X., Aroyo, L., Noy, N., Welty, C., Janowicz, K. (eds.) ISWC 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8219, pp. 294–309. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Cullot, N., Ghawi, R., Yétongnon, K.: DB2OWL: A Tool for Automatic Database-to-Ontology Mapping. In: SEBD 2007, pp. 491–494 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Das, S., Sundara, S., Cyganiak, R.: R2RML: RDB to RDF Mapping Language, W3C Working Draft (2012), http://www.w3.org/TR/r2rml/

  9. Erling, O., Mikhailov, I.: RDF support in the virtuoso DBMS. In: Networked Knowledge-Networked Media, pp. 7–24 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology Matching. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Salas, P., Viterbo, J., Breitman, K., Casanova, M.A.: StdTrip: Promoting the Reuse of Standard Vocabularies in Open Government Data. In: Wood, D. (ed.) Linking Government Data, Springer Verlag, pp. 113–134. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Salas, P.,, B.K., Viterbo, J., Casanova, M.A.: Interoperability by design using the StdTrip tool: an a priori approach. In: I-SEMANTICS (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: Ontology Matching: State of the Art and Future Challenges. In: IEEE TKDE, Los Alamitos, CA, USA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vidal, V.M., Casanova, M.A., Neto, L.E., Monteiro, J.M.: Semi-Automatic Approach for Generating Customized R2RML Mappings. In: Accepted to the 29th ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Gyeongju, Korea, March 24-28 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Berardi, R., Schiessl, M., Thimm, M., Casanova, M.A. (2014). The Role of Design Rationale in the Ontology Matching Step during the Triplification of Relational Databases. In: Decker, H., Lhotská, L., Link, S., Spies, M., Wagner, R.R. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8644. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10073-9_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10073-9_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10072-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10073-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics