Skip to main content

A Privacy-Friendly Framework for Vehicle-to-Grid Interactions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Smart Grid Security (SmartGridSec 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 8448))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In the next decades, Electric Vehicles (EVs) are expected to gain increasing popularity and huge penetration in the automotive market, thanks to their potentialities for close interaction with the Smart Grid ecosystem. Firstly, recharging EV’s batteries with energy produced by renewables will allow for a consistent reduction of pollution due to the carbon emissions of traditional gasoline combustion; secondly, batteries could be exploited to store/inject energy from/to the grid in order to compensate the unpredictable fluctuations caused by Renewable Energy Sources (RES). To this aim, a load aggregator is envisioned as a scheduling entity to plan the EVs’ battery recharge/discharge according to the user’s needs and the current power generation of the grid. The main drawback of the introduction of such load aggregator is a potential harm of users’ privacy: gathering information about the EVs’ recharge requests and plug/unplug events could make the scheduler able to infer the private travelling habits of the customers, thus exposing them to the risk of tracking attacks and to other privacy threats. To address this issue, this paper proposes a security infrastructure for privacy-friendly Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) interactions, which enables the load aggregator to schedule the EV’s battery charge/discharge without learning the current battery level, nor the amount of charged/discharged energy, nor the time periods in which the EVs are available for recharge. Our proposed scheduling protocol is based on the Shamir Secret Sharing scheme. We provide a security analysis of the privacy guarantees provided by our framework and compare its performance to the optimal schedule that would be obtained if the aggregator had full knowledge of the charging-related information.

The work in this paper has been partially funded by the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Reserach (MIUR) project ESPRESSo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that in a modulo \(n\) field negative numbers are represented by the upper half of the range \([0,n-1]\).

  2. 2.

    For the sake of easiness, in this paper we set as SSS threshold \(t=w\), meaning that all the Aggregators must collaborate to perform the charge/discharge scheduling procedure. However, to improve resiliency to faults and malfunctions, \(t\) could be lower than \(w\). For a discussion on the correct choice of \(t\) and \(w\), the reader is referred to [27].

References

  1. Chan, C., Bouscayrol, A., Chen, K.: Electric, hybrid, and fuel-cell vehicles: architectures and modeling. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 59(2), 589–598 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Offer, G., Howey, D., Contestabile, M., Clague, R., Brandon, N.: Comparative analysis of battery electric, hydrogen fuel cell and hybrid vehicles in a future sustainable road transport system. Energy Policy 38(1), 24–29 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Parks, K., Denholm, P., Markel, A.J.: Costs and emissions associated with plug-in hybrid electric vehicle charging in the Xcel Energy Colorado service territory. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, CO (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sioshansi, R., Denholm, P.: Emissions impacts and benefits of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and vehicle-to-grid services. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43(4), 1199–1204 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kempton, W., Tomić, J.: Vehicle-to-grid power implementation: from stabilizing the grid to supporting large-scale renewable energy. J. Power Sources 144(1), 280–294 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. DeForest, N., Funk, J., Lorimer, A., Ur, B., Sidhu, I., Kaminsky, P., Tenderich, B.: Impact of widespread electric vehicle adoption on the electrical utility business-threats and opportunities. Center for Entrepreneurship and Technology (CET) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE): Communication requirements for smart grid technologies (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kempton, W., Tomic, J., Letendre, S., Brooks, A., Lipman, T.: Vehicle-to-grid power: battery, hybrid, and fuel cell vehicles as resources for distributed electric power in california. In of Transportation Studies (UCD), U.D.I., ed.: Working Paper Series ECD-ITS-Rr-=1-03 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brooks, A.: Integration of electric drive vehicles with the power grid-a new application for vehicle batteries. In: The Seventeenth Annual Battery Conference on Applications and Advances, p. 239 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kempton, W., Marra, F., Andersen, P., Garcia-Valle, R.: Business models and control and management architectures for ev electrical grid integration. In: Garcia-Valle, R., Peas Lopes, J.A. (eds.) Electric Vehicle Integration into Modern Power Networks. Power Electronics and Power Systems, pp. 87–105. Springer, New York (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Brooks, A.: Vehicle-to-grid demonstration project: grid regulation ancillary service with a battery electric vehicle. In: Research Report to CARB, AC Propulsion (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hoh, B., Gruteser, M., Xiong, H., Alrabady, A.: Enhancing security and privacy in traffic-monitoring systems. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 5(4), 38–46 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liao, L., Patterson, D.J., Fox, D., Kautz, H.: Learning and inferring transportation routines. Artif. Intell. 171(5–6), 311–331 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, R., Dow, L., Liu, E.: A survey of pev impacts on electric utilities. In: 2011 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT), pp. 1–8 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Han, Y., Chen, Y., Han, F., Liu, K.: An optimal dynamic pricing and schedule approach in v2g. In: 2012 Asia-Pacific Signal Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC), pp. 1–8 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mets, K., Verschueren, T., Haerick, W., Develder, C., De Turck, F.: Optimizing smart energy control strategies for plug-in hybrid electric vehicle charging. In: 2010 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium Workshops (NOMS Wksps), pp. 293–299, April 2010

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stegelmann, M., Kesdogan, D.: Design and evaluation of a privacy-preserving architecture for vehicle-to-grid interaction. In: Petkova-Nikova, S., Pashalidis, A., Pernul, G. (eds.) EuroPKI 2011. LNCS, vol. 7163, pp. 75–90. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Stegelmann, M., Kesdogan, D.: Location privacy for vehicle-to-grid interaction through battery management. In: 2012 Ninth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG), pp. 373–378 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yang, Z., Yu, S., Lou, W., Liu, C.: \(p^{2}\): privacy-preserving communication and precise reward architecture for v2g networks in smart grid. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2(4), 697–706 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, J.K., Au, M.H., Susilo, W., Zhou, J.: Enhancing location privacy for electric vehicles (at the Right time). In: Foresti, S., Yung, M., Martinelli, F. (eds.) ESORICS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7459, pp. 397–414. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Nicanfar, H., Hosseininezhad, S., TalebiFard, P., Leung, V.C.M.: Robust privacy-preserving authentication scheme for communication between electric vehicle as power energy storage and power stations. In: INFOCOM, pp. 3429–3434. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shamir, A.: How to share a secret. Commun. ACM 22, 612–613 (1979)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Bogdanov, D.: Foundations and properties of shamir’s secret sharing scheme (2007). Research Seminar in Cryptography

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nishide, T., Ohta, K.: Multiparty computation for interval, equality, and comparison without bit-decomposition protocol. In: Okamoto, T., Wang, X. (eds.) PKC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4450, pp. 343–360. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Kerschbaum, F., Biswas, D., de Hoogh, S.: Performance comparison of secure comparison protocols. In: 20th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Application, pp. 133–136 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bychkovsky, V., Hull, B., Miu, A., Balakrishnan, H., Madden, S.: A measurement study of vehicular internet access using in situ wi-fi networks. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, MobiCom ’06, pp. 50–61. ACM, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rottondi, C., Verticale, G., Capone, A.: Privacy-preserving smart metering with multiple data consumers. Comput. Netw. 57(7), 1699–1713 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stinson, D.: Cryptography Theory and Practice, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rottondi, C., Mauri, G., Verticale, G.: A protocol for metering data pseudonymization in smart grids to appear on Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies. doi:10.1002/ett.2760

  30. Rottondi, C., Fontana, S., Verticale, G.: Enabling privacy in vehicle-to-grid interactions for battery recharging. Energies 7, 2780–2798 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Barker, S., Mishra, A., Irwin, D., Cecchet, E., Shenoy, P., Albrecht, J.: Smart*: an open data set and tools for enabling research in sustainable homes. In: The 1st KDD Workshop on Data Mining Applications in Sustainability (SustKDD) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Global Energy Forecasting Competition 2012: Wind forecasting. http://www.kaggle.com/c/GEF2012-wind-forecasting/data

  33. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration: National household travel survey (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Cristina Rottondi or Giacomo Verticale .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rottondi, C., Fontana, S., Verticale, G. (2014). A Privacy-Friendly Framework for Vehicle-to-Grid Interactions. In: Cuellar, J. (eds) Smart Grid Security. SmartGridSec 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8448. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10329-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10329-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10328-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10329-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics