Skip to main content

Pinpointing Sentence-Level Subjectivity through Balanced Subjective and Objective Features

  • Conference paper
Advances in Natural Language Processing (NLP 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8686))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2023 Accesses

Abstract

The sentence-level subjectivity classification is a challenging task. This paper pinpoints some of its unique characteristics. It argues that these characteristics should be considered when extracting subjective or objective features from sentences. Through various sentence-level subjectivity classification experiments with numerous feature combinations, we found that balanced features for both subjective and objective sentences help to achieve balanced precision and recall for sentence subjectivity classification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Banfield, A.: Unspeakable sentences: Narration and representation in the language of fiction, p. 256. Routledge & Kegan Paul, Boston (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bruce, R., Wiebe, J.: Recognizingsubjectivity: A case study in manual tagging. Natural Language Engineering 5(2) (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support vector machine. Machine Learning 20(3), 273–297 (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Fan, R.E., Chang, K.W., Hsieh, C.J., Wang, X.R., Lin, C.J.: LIBLINEAR: A library for large linear classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research 9, 1871–1874 (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Hatzivassiloglou, V., Wiebe, J.: Effectsof adjective orientation and gradability on sentencesubjectivity. In: Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 299–305. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Jang, H., Kim, M., Shin, H.: KOSAC: A Full-fledged Korean Sentiment Analysis Corpus. In: Proceedings of the 27th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Liu, B.: Sentiment analysis and subjectivity. In: Handbook of Natural Language Processing, vol. 2, pp. 627–666 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., et al.: Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 12, 2825–2830 (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., Svartvik, J.: A ComprehensiveGrammar of the English Language. Longman, New York (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shin, H., Kim, M., Jo, Y.M., Jang, H., Cattle, A.: Annotation Scheme for Constructing Sentiment Corpus in Korean. In: Proceedings of the 26th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, pp. 181–190 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wiebe, J.M., Bruce, R.F., O’Hara, T.P.: Development and use of a gold standard dataset for subjectivity classifications. In: Proceedings ofthe 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for ComputationalLinguistics, pp. 246–253 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wiebe, J., Riloff, E.: Creating subjective and objective sentence classifiers from unannotated texts. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2005. LNCS, vol. 3406, pp. 486–497. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Wiebe, J., Wilson, T., Cardie, C.: Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language. Language Resources and Evaluation 39(2-3), 165–210 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wilson, T.A.: Fine-grained Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis: Recognizing the intensity, polarity and attitudes of private states. Doctoral Dissertation, Univ. of Pittsburgh (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yu, H., Hatzivassiloglou, V.: Towards answering opinion questions: separating facts from opinions and identifying the polarity of opinion sentences. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 129–136. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kim, M., Shin, H. (2014). Pinpointing Sentence-Level Subjectivity through Balanced Subjective and Objective Features. In: Przepiórkowski, A., Ogrodniczuk, M. (eds) Advances in Natural Language Processing. NLP 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8686. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10888-9_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10888-9_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10887-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10888-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics