Skip to main content

Graph-Based, Supervised Machine Learning Approach to (Irregular) Polysemy in WordNet

  • Conference paper
Advances in Natural Language Processing (NLP 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8686))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2008 Accesses

Abstract

This paper presents a supervised machine learning approach that aims at annotating those homograph word forms in WordNet that share some common meaning and can hence be thought of as belonging to a polysemous word. Using different graph-based measures, a set of features is selected, and a random forest model is trained and evaluated. The results are compared to other features used for polysemy identification in WordNet. The features proposed in this paper not only outperform the commonly used CoreLex resource, but they also work on different parts of speech and can be used to identify both regular and irregular polysemous word forms in WordNet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Apresjan, J.U.D.: Regular Polysemy. Linguistics 12, 5–32 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boleda, G., Padó, S., Utt, J.: Regular polysemy: A distributional model. In: Proceedings of the First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics – vol. 1: Proceedings of the Main Conference and the Shared Task, and vol. 2: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, SemEval 2012, vol. 1, pp. 151–160. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bonacich, P.: Power and Centrality: A family of Measures. The American Journal of Sociology 92(5), 1170–1182 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Breiman, L.: Random forests. Machine Learning 45, 5–32 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Buitelaar, P.: Corelex: An ontology of systematic polysemous classes. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS 1998), June 6-8. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 46, pp. 221–235. IOS Press, Trento (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Freeman, L.C.: Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks 1(1978), 215–239 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirst, G., St-Onge, D.: Lexical chains as representations of context for the detection and correction of malapropisms. In: Fellbaum, C. (ed.) WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, pp. 305–332. MIT Press (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang, J.J., Conrath, D.W.: Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. CoRR cmp-lg/9709008 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leacock, C., Miller, G.A., Chodorow, M.: Using corpus statistics and wordnet relations for sense identification. Comput. Linguist. 24(1), 147–165 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lin, D.: An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In: Shavlik, J.W. (ed.) Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 1998), Madison, WI, USA, July 24-27, pp. 296–304. Morgan-Kaufman Publishers, San Francisco (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miller, G.A.: WordNet: A lexical database for english. Commun. ACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., Winograd, T.: The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. In: Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 161–172 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pedersen, T., Patwardhan, S., Michelizzi, J.: Wordnet: Similarity – measuring the relatedness of concepts. In: McGuinness, D.L., Ferguson, G. (eds.) AAAI, pp. 1024–1025. AAAI Press / The MIT Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Resnik, P., Yarowsky, D.: Distinguishing systems and distinguishing senses: new evaluation methods for word sense disambiguation. Natural Language Engineering 5(2), 113–133 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Snow, R., Prakash, S., Jurafsky, D., Ng, A.Y.: Learning to merge word senses. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, June 28-30, pp. 1005–1014. ACL (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Utt, J., Padó, S.: Ontology-based distinction between polysemy and homonymy. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Computational Semantics, IWCS 2011, pp. 265–274. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Veale, T.: Polysemy and category structure in wordnet: An evidential approach. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2004. European Language Resources Association (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wu, Z., Palmer, M.: Verbs semantics and lexical selection. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 1994, pp. 133–138. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Entrup, B. (2014). Graph-Based, Supervised Machine Learning Approach to (Irregular) Polysemy in WordNet. In: Przepiórkowski, A., Ogrodniczuk, M. (eds) Advances in Natural Language Processing. NLP 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8686. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10888-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10888-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10887-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10888-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics