Abstract
Children’s representations of geometric categories like triangles are often centered on a prototypical exemplar (e.g., an equilateral triangle). New cases are judged based on perceptual similarity to the prototype; such a strategy leads to systematic errors in categorization. Creating correct geometric categories requires children to move beyond a reliance on perceptual similarity and learn category-defining rules (e.g., a triangle is an enclosed, three-sided shape). In this research, we test whether a brief training experience using comparison could help three- and four-year-old children learn the category of triangle. Further, we ask whether different types of comparisons (within-category or between-category) support learning in distinct ways. The data indicate that both types of comparison fostered category learning, but that within-category comparisons promoted generalization to new exemplars whereas between-category comparisons reduced overgeneralization to non-exemplars. Furthermore, these effects were moderated by the perceptual similarity of the compared pairs. The results indicate that comparison can foster spatial category learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Satlow, E., Newcombe, N.: When is a triangle not a triangle? Young children’s conceptions of geometric shapes. Cognitive Development 13, 547–559 (1998)
Forbus, K.D.: Qualitative modeling. WIREs Cogn. Sci. 2, 374–391 (2011)
Ankowski, A.A., Vlach, H.A., Sandhofer, C.M.: Comparison Versus Contrast: Task Specifics Affect Category Acquisition. Inf. Child. Dev. 22(1), 1–23 (2013)
Casasola, M.: Can language do the driving? The effect of linguistic input on infants’ categorization of support spatial relations. Developmental Psychology 41, 183–191 (2005)
Childers, J.B.: Attention to multiple events helps 21⁄2-year-olds extend new verbs. First Language 31, 3–22 (2011)
Christie, S., Gentner, D.: Where hypotheses come from: Learning new relations by structural alignment. J. Cognition and Development 11(3), 356–373 (2010)
Gentner, D., Namy, L.: Comparison in the Development of Categories. Cognitive Development 14, 487–513 (1999)
Kotovsky, L., Gentner, D.: Comparison and Categorization in the Development of Relational Similarity. Child Development 67, 2797–2822 (1996)
Waxman, S.R., Klibanoff, R.S.: The role of comparison in the extension of novel adjectives. Developmental Psychology 36(5), 571–581 (2000)
Namy, L.L., Gentner, D.: Making a silk purse out of two sow’s ears: Young children’s use of comparison in category learning. J. Experimental Psychology: General 131(1), 5–15 (2002)
Markman, A.B., Gentner, D.: Structure-Mapping in the Comparison Process, Amer. J. of Psychology 113(4), 501–538 (2000)
Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K.D., Gentner, D.: The Structure-Mapping Engine: Algorithm and Examples. Artificial Intelligence 20(41), 1–63 (1989)
Gentner, D.: Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science 7(2), 155–170 (1983)
Gentner, D.: Bootstrapping the mind: Analogical processes and symbol systems. Cognitive Science 34(5), 752–775 (2010)
Markman, A.B., Gentner, D.: Structural alignment during similarity comparisons. Cognitive Psychology 25, 431–467 (1993)
Gentner, D., Markman, A.B.: Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist 52, 45–56 (1997)
Higgins, E.J., Ross, B.H.: Comparisons in Category Learning: How Best to Compare for What. In: Carlson, L., Hölscher, C., Shipley, T. (eds.) Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1388–1393. Cognitive Science Society, Austin (2011)
Gentner, D., Anggoro, F.K., Klibanoff, R.S.: Structure-mapping and Relational Language Support Children’s Learning of Relational Categories. Child Development 82(4), 1173–1188 (2011)
Gentner, D., Levine, S., Dhillon, S., Poltermann, A.: Using structural alignment to facilitate learning of spatial concepts in an informal setting. In: Kokinov, B., Holyoak, K.J., Gentner, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Analogy. NBU Press, Sofia (2009)
Gentner, D., Levine, S.C., Dhillon, S., Ping, R., Bradley, C., Poltermann, A., Honke, G.: Rapid learning in a children’s museum via analogical comparison (submitted)
Goldstone, R.L., Sakamoto, Y.: The Transfer of Abstract Principles Governing Complex Adaptive Systems. Cognitive Psychology 46, 414–466 (2003)
Gentner, D., Rattermann, M.J.: Language and the career of similarity. In: Gelman, S.A., Byrnes, J.P. (eds.) Perspectives on Thought and Language: Interrelations in Development, pp. 225–277. Cambridge University Press, London (1991)
Goldstone, R.L.: Isolated and Interrelated Concepts. Memory & Cognition 24, 608–628 (1996)
McLure, M.D., Friedman, S.E., Forbus, K.D.: Learning concepts from sketches via analogical generalization and near-misses. Proc. Cog. Sci., 465–470 (2010)
Gick, M.L., Paterson, K.J.: Do contrasting examples facilitate schema acquisition and analogical transfer? Canadian Journal of Psychology 46, 539–550 (1992)
Kurtz, K.J., Gentner, D.: Detecting anomalous features in complex stimuli: The role of structured comparison. JEP: Applied 19(3), 219–232 (2013)
Waxman, S., Gelman, R.: Preschoolers’ use of superordinate relations in classification and language. Cognitive Development 1, 139–156 (1986)
Namy, L.L., Clepper, L.E.: The differing roles of comparison and contrast in children’s categorization. J. Experimental Child Psychology 107, 291–305 (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Smith, L., Ping, R.M., Matlen, B.J., Goldwater, M.B., Gentner, D., Levine, S. (2014). Mechanisms of Spatial Learning: Teaching Children Geometric Categories. In: Freksa, C., Nebel, B., Hegarty, M., Barkowsky, T. (eds) Spatial Cognition IX. Spatial Cognition 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8684. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11215-2_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11215-2_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11214-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11215-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)