Skip to main content

A New Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision Making Approach: Extended Hierarchical Fuzzy Axiomatic Design Approach with Risk Factors

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Decision Support Systems III - Impact of Decision Support Systems for Global Environments (EWG-DSS 2013, EWG-DSS 2013)

Abstract

In recent years, Axiomatic Design (AD) has been widely used as a multi criteria decision making approach. AD approach compares the design objects and system capabilities in a framework and then selects the best alternative based on these comparisons. Some researchers then include fuzziness in the AD approach which helps to evaluate alternatives in fuzzy environments. The main advantage of fuzzy AD approach is the ability to evaluate both crisp and fuzzy values at the same time during decision process. However, these approaches are not appropriate for hierarchical decision problems. Therefore, these are extended to solve the hierarchical decision problems and Hierarchical Fuzzy Axiomatic Design Approach (HFAD) is presented. In this study, HFAD is extended to include risk factors for the first time in literature and a new approach called RFAD is proposed. Moreover, the application of the new approach is shown on a real world supplier selection problem and the results are compared to the other widely used decision making approaches in literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Babic, B.: Axiomatic design of flexible manufacturing systems. Int. J. Prod. Res. 37(5), 1159–1173 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bang, I.C., Heo, G.: An axiomatic design approach in development of nanofluid coolants. Appl. Therm. Eng. 29(1), 75–90 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan, F.T.S.: Interactive selection model for supplier selection process: an analytical hierarchy process approach. Int. J. Prod. Res. 41(15), 3549–3579 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang, D.Y.: Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 95(3), 649–655 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang, P.L., Chen, Y.C.: A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method for technology transfer selection in biotechnology. Fuzzy Set. and Syst. 63, 131–139 (1994)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, S.J., Hwang, C.L.: Fuzzy multi attribute decision making. Methods and Applications. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 375. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, S.M.: Evaluating weapon systems using fuzzy arithmetic operations. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 77, 265–276 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, S.M.: A new method for tool steel materials selection under fuzzy environments. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 92(2), 265–274 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng, C.H., Yang, K.L., Hwang, C.H.: Evaluating attack helicopters by AHP based on linguistic variable weight. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 116, 423–435 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Çelik, M., Çebi, S., Kahraman, C., Er, I.D.: An integrated fuzzy QFD model proposal on routing of shipping investment decisions in crude oil tanker market. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(3), 6227–6235 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Güner, H., Mutlu, O., Kulak, O.: Supplier selection in fuzzy environment. In: Durmuşoğlu, B., Kahraman, C. (eds.) 35th Computers and Industrial Engineering, Turkey, Istanbul, 2005, pp. 839–844 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ho, W., Xu, X., Dey, P.K.: Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 202, 16–24 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kahraman, C., Çebi, S.: A new multi-attribute decision making method: hierarchical fuzzy axiomatic design. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 4848–4861 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kulak, O., Durmuşoğlu, B., Tufekci, S.: A complete cellular manufacturing system design methodology based on axiomatic design principles. Comput. Ind. Eng. 48, 765–787 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kulak, O.: A decision support system for fuzzy multi-attribute selection of material handling equipments. Expert Syst. Appl. 29(2), 310–319 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kulak, O., Durmuşoğlu, B., Kahraman, C.: Fuzzy multi-attribute equipment selection based on information axiom. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 169(3), 337–345 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kulak, O., Kahraman, C.: Fuzzy multi-attribute selection among transportation companies using axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process. Inf. Sci. 170, 191–210 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Kulak, O., Kahraman, C.: Multi-attribute comparison of advanced manufacturing systems using fuzzy vs. crisp axiomatic design. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 95, 415–424 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kulak, O., Durmuşoğlu, B.: A methodology for the design of Office cells using axiomatic design principles. Omega 36(4), 633–652 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kulak, O., Çebi, S., Kahraman, C.: Applications of axiomatic design principles: A literature review. Expert Syst. Appl. 37, 6705–6717 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee, A.H.I.: A fuzzy supplier selection model with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 2879–2893 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Levary, R.R.: Using the analytic hierarchy process to rank foreign suppliers based on supply risks. Comput. Ind. Eng. 55(2008), 535–542 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lindkvist, L., Soderberk, R.: Computer-aided tolerance chain and stability analysis. J. Eng. Des. 14(1), 17–39 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ravindran, A.R., Bilsel, R.U., Wadhwa, V., Yang, T.: Risk adjusted multicriteria supplier selection models with applications. Int. J. Prod. Res. 48(2), 405–424 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Saen, R.F.: Suppliers selection in the presence of both cardinal and ordinal data. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 183(2), 741–747 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Suh, N.P.: The Principles of Design. Oxford University Press, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Suh, N.P.: Designing –in of quality through axiomatic design. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 44(2), 256–264 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Suh, N.P., Cochran, D.S., Lima, P.C.: Manufacturing system design. Ann. CIRP 47(2), 627–639 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Suh, N.P.: Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications. Oxford University Press, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Talluri, S., Narasimhan, R.: A methodology for strategic sourcing. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 154(1), 236–250 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Tang, D., Zhang, G., Dai, S.: Design as integration of axiomatic design and design structure matrix. Rob. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 25(3), 610–619 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Togay, C., Dogru, A.H., Tanik, C.U.: Systematic component-oriented development with axiomatic design. J. Syst. Softw. 81(11), 803–1815 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Van Laarhoven, P.J.M., Pedrycz, W.: A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 11, 229–241 (1983)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Wu, T., Shunk, D., Blackhurst, J., Appalla, R.: AIDEA: a methodology for supplier evaluation and selection in a supplier-based manufacturing environment. Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 11(2), 174–192 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Xiao, Z., Weijie, C., Lingling, L.: An integrated FCM and fuzzy soft set for supplier selection problem based on risk evaluation. Appl. Math. Model. 36, 1444–1454 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Xu, Z., Yager, R.R.: Dynamic intutionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 48, 246–262 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhu, K.J., Jing, Y., Chang, D.Y.: A discussion on extent analysis method and applications of fuzzy AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 116, 450–456 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Pamukkale University under the Project no 1719.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hacer Güner Gören .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gören, H.G., Kulak, O. (2014). A New Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision Making Approach: Extended Hierarchical Fuzzy Axiomatic Design Approach with Risk Factors. In: Dargam, F., et al. Decision Support Systems III - Impact of Decision Support Systems for Global Environments. EWG-DSS EWG-DSS 2013 2013. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 184. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11364-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11364-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11363-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11364-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics