Skip to main content

Self-supervised Relation Extraction Using UMLS

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8685))

Abstract

Self-supervised relation extraction uses a knowledge base to automatically annotate a training corpus which is then used to train a classifier. This approach has been successfully applied to different domains using a range of knowledge bases. This paper applies the approach to the biomedical domain using UMLS, a large biomedical knowledge base containing millions of concepts and relations among them. The approach is evaluated using two different techniques. The presented results are promising and indicate that UMLS is a useful resource for semi-supervised relation extraction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agichtein, E., Gravano, L.: Snowball: extracting relations from large plain-text collections. In: Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Digital libraries, DL 2000, pp. 85–94 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aronson, A., Lang, F.: An overview of MetaMap: historical perspective and recent advances. Journal of the American Medical Association 17(3), 229–236 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Björne, J., Salakoski, T.: Generalizing biomedical event extraction. In: Proceedings of BioNLP Shared Task 2011 Workshop, pp. 183–191. Association for Computational Linguistics, Portland (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Björne, J., Salakoski, T.: Tees 2.1: Automated annotation scheme learning in the bionlp 2013 shared task. In: Proceedings of the BioNLP Shared Task 2013 Workshop, pp. 16–25. Association for Computational Linguistics, Sofia (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brin, S.: Extracting patterns and relations from the world wide web. In: Atzeni, P., Mendelzon, A.O., Mecca, G. (eds.) WebDB 1998. LNCS, vol. 1590, pp. 172–183. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Charniak, E., Johnson, M.: Coarse-to-fine n-best parsing and maxent discriminative reranking. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2005, pp. 173–180 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Collins, M., Duffy, N.: New ranking algorithms for parsing and tagging: Kernels over discrete structures, and the voted perceptron. In: Proceedings of 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 263–270. Association for Computational Linguistics, Philadelphia (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Craven, M., Kumlien, J.: Constructing biological knowledge bases by extracting information from text sources. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology (ISMB), pp. 77–86. AAAI Press (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dietterich, T.G., Lathrop, R.H., Lozano-Perez, T., Pharmaceutical, A.: Solving the multiple-instance problem with axis-parallel rectangles. Artificial Intelligence 89, 31–71 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoffmann, R., Zhang, C., Ling, X., Zettlemoyer, L., Weld, D.S.: Knowledge-based weak supervision for information extraction of overlapping relations. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2011, pp. 541–550 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hoffmann, R., Zhang, C., Weld, D.S.: Learning 5000 relational extractors. In: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2010, pp. 286–295 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Joachims, T.: Making Large-scale Support Vector Machine Learning Practical. In: Advances in Kernel Methods, pp. 169–184 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Klein, D., Manning, C.D.: Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 423–430 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mintz, M., Bills, S., Snow, R., Jurafsky, D.: Distant supervision for relation extraction without labeled data. In: Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP: ACL 2009, vol. 2, pp. 1003–1011 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moschitti, A.: Making tree kernels practical for natural language learning. In: EACL, pp. 113–120 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Porter, M.F.: An Algorithm for Suffix Stripping. In: Readings in Information Retrieval, pp. 313–316 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Riedel, S., McClosky, D., Surdeanu, M., McCallum, A.: D. Manning, C.: Model combination for event extraction in bionlp 2011. In: Proceedings of BioNLP Shared Task 2011 Workshop, pp. 51–55. Association for Computational Linguistics, Portland (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Riedel, S., Yao, L., McCallum, A.: Modeling relations and their mentions without labeled text. In: Balcázar, J.L., Bonchi, F., Gionis, A., Sebag, M. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2010, Part III. LNCS, vol. 6323, pp. 148–163. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Segura-Bedmar, I., Martínez, P., de Pablo-Sánchez, C.: Using a shallow linguistic kernel for drug-drug interaction extraction. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 44(5), 789–804 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Snow, R., Jurafsky, D., Ng, A.Y.: Learning syntactic patterns for automatic hypernym discovery. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2004) (November 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Takamatsu, S., Sato, I., Nakagawa, H.: Reducing wrong labels in distant supervision for relation extraction. In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Long Papers, ACL 2012, vol. 1, pp. 721–729 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Thomas, P., Neves, M., Solt, I., Tikk, D., Leser, U.: Relation extraction for drug-drug interactions using ensemble learning. In: DDIExtraction2011: First Challenge Task: Drug-Drug Interaction Extraction at SEPLN 2011, vol. 4, pp. 11–18 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Thomas, I.P., Solt, Klinger, R., Leser, U.: Learning protein protein interaction extraction using distant supervision. In: Proceedings of Robust Unsupervised and Semi-Supervised Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 34–41 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Xu, W., Hoffmann, R., Zhao, L., Grishman, R.: Filling knowledge base gaps for distant supervision of relation extraction. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pp. 665–670. Association for Computational Linguistics, Sofia (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Roller, R., Stevenson, M. (2014). Self-supervised Relation Extraction Using UMLS. In: Kanoulas, E., et al. Information Access Evaluation. Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction. CLEF 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8685. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11382-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11382-1_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11381-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11382-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics