Abstract
As spatio-temporal movement data is becoming more widely available for analysis in GIS and related areas, new methods to analyze them have been developed. A step-selection function (SSF) is a recently developed method used to quantify the effect of environmental factors on animal movement. This method is gaining traction as an important conservation tool; however there have been no studies that have investigated the uncertainty associated with subjective model decisions. In this research we used two types of animals – oilbirds and hyenas – to examine how systematically altering user decisions of model parameters influences the main outcome of an SSF, the coefficients that quantify the movement-environment relationship. We found that user decisions strongly influence the results of step-selection functions and any subsequent inferences about animal movement and environmental interactions. Differences were found between categories for every variable used in the analysis and the results presented here can help to clarify the sources of uncertainty in SSF model decisions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Miller, H.J.: A measurement theory for time geography. Geogr. Anal. 37, 17–45 (2005)
Cagnacci, F., Boitani, L., Powell, R.A., Boyce, M.S.: Animal ecology meets GPS-based radiotelemetry: a perfect storm of opportunities and challenges. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B. 365, 2157–2162 (2010)
Gudmundsson, J., Laube, P., Wolle, T.: Computational movement analysis. In: Springer Handbook of Geographic Information, pp. 423–438. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Crosetto, M., Tarantola, S.: Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis: tools for GIS-based model implementation. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 15, 415–437 (2001)
Laube, P., Purves, R.S.: How fast is a cow? Cross-Scale Analysis of Movement Data. Trans. GIS. 15, 401–418 (2011)
Manly, B.F., McDonald, L.L., Thomas, D.L., McDonald, T.L., Erickson, W.P.: Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. Springer (2002)
Fortin, D., Beyer, H.L., Boyce, M.S., Smith, D.W., Duchesne, T., Mao, J.S.: Wolves influence elk movements: behavior shapes a trophic cascade in Yellowstone National Park. Ecology 86, 1320–1330 (2005)
Forester, J.D., Im, H.K., Rathouz, P.J.: Accounting for animal movement in estimation of resource selection functions: sampling and data analysis. Ecology 90, 3554–3565 (2009)
Gillies, C.S., Beyer, H.L., St. Clair, C.C.: Fine-scale movement decisions of tropical forest birds in a fragmented landscape. Ecol. Appl. 21, 944–954 (2011)
Latham, A.D.M., Latham, M.C., Boyce, M.S., Boutin, S.: Movement responses by wolves to industrial linear features and their effect on woodland caribou in northeastern Alberta. Ecol. Appl. 21, 2854–2865 (2011)
Thurfjell, H., Ciuti, S., Boyce, M.S.: Applications of step-selection functions in ecology and conservation. Mov. Ecol. 2, 4 (2014)
Beyer, H.L.: Geospatial Modeling Environment, http://www.spatialecology.com/gme/gmehelp.htm (accessed December 12, 2013)
Coulon, A., Morellet, N., Goulard, M., Cargnelutti, B., Angibault, J.-M., Hewison, A.M.: Inferring the effects of landscape structure on roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) movements using a step selection function. Landsc. Ecol. 23, 603–614 (2008)
Squires, J.R., DeCesare, N.J., Olson, L.E., Kolbe, J.A., Hebblewhite, M., Parks, S.A.: Combining resource selection and movement behavior to predict corridors for Canada lynx at their southern range periphery. Biol. Conserv. 157, 187–195 (2013)
Bjørneraas, K., Solberg, E.J., Herfindal, I., Moorter, B.V., Rolandsen, C.M., Tremblay, J.-P., Skarpe, C., Sæther, B.-E., Eriksen, R., Astrup, R.: Moose Alces alces habitat use at multiple temporal scales in a human-altered landscape. Wildl. Biol. 17, 44–54 (2011)
Lele, S.R., Keim, J.L.: Weighted distributions and estimation of resource selection probability functions. Ecology 87, 3021–3028 (2006)
Barbet-Massin, M., Jiguet, F., Albert, C.H., Thuiller, W.: Selecting pseudo-absences for species distribution models: how, where and how many? Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3, 327–338 (2012)
Northrup, J.M., Hooten, M.B., Anderson Jr, C.R., Wittemyer, G.: Practical guidance on characterizing availability in resource selection functions under a use-availability design. Ecology 94, 1456–1463 (2013)
Northrup, J.M., Pitt, J., Muhly, T.B., Stenhouse, G.B., Musiani, M., Boyce, M.S.: Vehicle traffic shapes grizzly bear behavior on a multiple-use landscape. J. Appl. Ecol. 49, 1159–1167 (2012)
Sawyer, H., Nielson, R.M., Lindzey, F., McDonald, L.L.: Winter habitat selection of mule deer before and during development of a natural gas field. J. Wildlife Manage. 70, 396–403 (2006)
Lindberg, M.S., Walker, J.: Satellite telemetry in avian research and management: sample size considerations. J. Wildl. Manag. 71, 1002–1009 (2007)
Pereboom, V., Mergey, M., Villerette, N., Helder, R., Gerard, J.-F., Lode, T.: Movement patterns, habitat selection, and corridor use of a typical woodland-dweller species, the European pine marten (Martes martes), in fragmented landscape. Can. J. Zool. 86, 983–991 (2008)
Gschweng, M., Kalko, E.K., Berthold, P., Fiedler, W., Fahr, J.: Multi-temporal distribution modeling with satellite tracking data: predicting responses of a long-distance migrant to changing environmental conditions. J. Appl. Ecol. 49, 803–813 (2012)
Holland, R.A., Wikelski, M., Kümmeth, F., Bosque, C.: The secret life of oilbirds: new insights into the movement ecology of a unique avian frugivore. PLoS One 4, e8264 (2009)
Data from: The secret life of oilbirds: new insights into the movement ecology of a unique avian frugivore, http://hdl.handle.net/10255/move.269
Maude, G.: The spatial ecology and foraging behavior of the brown hyaena (Hyaena brunnea) (Doctoral dissertation, University of Bristol) (2010)
Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center (LP DAAC) at the USGS/Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center, Siox Falls, South Dakota (2013)
Ramankutty, N., Evan, A.T., Mondreda, C., Foley, J.A.: Global Agricultural Lands: Croplands (2000); Data distributed by the Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), http://seda.ciesin.columbia.edu/es/algands.html (2010) (accessed January 3, 2014)
Center for International Earth Science Information Network - CIESIN - Columbia University and Information Technology Outreach Services - ITOS - University of Georgia. Global Roads Open Access Data Set, Version 1 (gROADSv1). NASA Socioecomonic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), Palisades (2013), http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/set/groads-global-roads-open-access-v1 (accessed on January 3, 2014)
Therneau, T.: A package for survival analysis in S. R package version 2.37.4. (2013)
Cohen, J.: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Psychology Press (1988)
Chekiewicz, C.L.B., St Clair, C.C., Boyce, M.S.: Corridors for conservation: integrating pattern and process. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evo. Syst. 37, 317–342
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Holloway, P., Miller, J.A. (2014). Uncertainty Analysis of Step-Selection Functions: The Effect of Model Parameters on Inferences about the Relationship between Animal Movement and the Environment. In: Duckham, M., Pebesma, E., Stewart, K., Frank, A.U. (eds) Geographic Information Science. GIScience 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8728. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11593-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11593-1_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11592-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11593-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)