Skip to main content

Architecture Framework for Software Safety

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 8769))

Abstract

Currently, an increasing number of systems are controlled by software and rely on the correct operation of software. In this context, a safety-critical system is defined as a system in which malfunctioning software could result in death, injury or damage to environment. To mitigate these serious risks, the architecture of safety-critical systems needs to be carefully designed and analyzed. A common practice for modeling software architecture is the adoption of software architecture viewpoints to model the architecture for particular stakeholders and concerns. Existing architecture viewpoints tend to be general purpose and do not explicitly focus on safety concerns in particular. To provide a complementary and dedicated support for designing safety critical systems, we propose an architecture framework for software safety. The architecture framework is based on a metamodel that has been developed after a thorough domain analysis. The framework includes three coherent viewpoints, each of which addressing an important concern. The application of the viewpoints is illustrated for an industrial case of safety-critical avionics control computer system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Clements, P., Bachmann, F., Bass, L., Garlan, D., Ivers, J., Little, R., Nord, R., Stafford, J.: Documenting Software Architectures: Views and Beyond. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Douglass, B.P.: Analyze System Safety using UML within the IBM Rational Rhapsody Environment. IBM Rational White Paper, IBM Software Group (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gawand, H., Mundada, R.S., Swaminathan, P.: Design Patterns to Implement Safety and Fault Tolerance. International Journal of Computer Applications 18, 6–13 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hofmeister, C., Nord, R., Soni, D.: Applied Software Architecture. Addison-Wesley, MA (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. ISO/DIS 26262, Road vehicles - Functional safety. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kruchten, P.: The 4+1 View Model of Architecture. IEEE Software 12(6), 42–50 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Leveson, N.G., Harvey, P.R.: Analyzing Software Safety. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 9(5), 569–579 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leveson, N.G.: Safeware: System Safety and Computers. Addison-Wesley, NY (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Meta Object Facility (MOF), http://www.omg.org/mof/

  10. Rozanski, N., Woods, E.: Software Architecture Systems Working with Stakeholders Using Viewpoints and Perspectives. Addison-Wesley (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. RTCA DO-178B, Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Software Safety Guide Book, NASA Technical Standard, http://www.nasa.gov/

  13. Sözer, H., Tekinerdogan, B., Aksit, M.: Optimizing Decomposition of Software Architecture for Local Recovery. Software Quality Journal 21(2), 203–240 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Taguchi, K.: Meta Modeling Approach to Safety Standard for Consumer Devices. Seminar on Systems Assurance & Safety for Consumer Devices (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tekinerdogan, B., Sözer, H.: Defining Architectural Viewpoints for Quality Concerns. In: Crnkovic, I., Gruhn, V., Book, M. (eds.) ECSA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6903, pp. 26–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu, W., Kelly, T.: Safety Tactics for Software Architecture Design. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference, pp. 368–375. IEEE Computer Society, USA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zoughbi, G., Briand, L., Labiche, Y.: A UML Profile for Developing Airworthiness-Compliant (RTCA DO-178B), Safety-Critical Software. In: Engels, G., Opdyke, B., Schmidt, D.C., Weil, F. (eds.) MODELS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4735, pp. 574–588. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gülay Gürbüz, H., Pala Er, N., Tekinerdogan, B. (2014). Architecture Framework for Software Safety. In: Amyot, D., Fonseca i Casas, P., Mussbacher, G. (eds) System Analysis and Modeling: Models and Reusability. SAM 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8769. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11743-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11743-0_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11742-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11743-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics