Abstract
Review-based websites such as, e.g., Amazon, eBay, TripAdvisor, and Booking have gained an extraordinary popularity, with millions of users daily consulting online reviews to choose the best services and products fitting their needs. Some of the most popular review-based websites rank products by sorting them aggregating the single ratings through their arithmetic mean. In contrast, recent studies have proved that the median is a more robust aggregator, in terms of ad hoc injections of outlier ratings. In this paper, we focus on four different types of ratings aggregators. We propose to the slotted mean and the slotted median, and we compare their mathematical properties with the mean and the median. The results of our experiments highlight advantages and drawbacks of relying on each of these quality indexes. Our experiments have been carried out on a large data set of hotel reviews collected from Booking.com, while our proposed solutions are rooted on sound statistical theory. The results shown in this paper, other than being interesting on their own, also call for further investigations.
This research has been partially funded by the Tuscany region project MyChoice and by the Registro.it project MIB (My Information Bubble).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Internet Travel Hotel Statistics (June 18, 2013), http://statisticbrain.com
Statistics Summary for Booking.com (May 2013), http://alexa.com
Anderson, C.: The impact of social media on lodging performance. Cornell Hospitality Report 12(15) (November 2012)
Aperjis, C., Johari, R.: Designing aggregation mechanisms for reputation systems in online marketplaces. SIGecom Exch. 9 (2010)
Aperjis, C., Johari, R.: Optimal windows for aggregating ratings in electronic marketplaces. Management Science 56(5) (2010)
Buchegger, S., Le Boudec, J.: A robust reputation system for mobile ad-hoc networks. Technical report, IC/2003/50 EPFL-IC-LCA (2003)
Chen, W., Zeng, Q., Wenyin, L.: A User Reputation Model for a User-Interactive Question Answering System. In: SKG 2006. IEEE (2006)
Cornelli, F., Damiani, E., di Vimercati, S.D.C., Paraboschi, S., Samarati, P.: Choosing reputable servents in a p2p network. In: WWW 2002. ACM (2002)
Dellarocas, C.: Immunizing online reputation reporting systems against unfair ratings and discriminatory behavior. In: ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce (2000)
Dellarocas, C., Wood, C.A.: The sound of silence in online feedback: Estimating trading risks in the presence of reporting bias. Management Science 54(3) (2008)
Fan, M., Tan, Y., Whinston, A.B.: Evaluation and design of online cooperative feedback mechanisms for reputation management. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 17(2) (2005)
Garcin, F., Faltings, B., Jurca, R.: Aggregating reputation feedback. In: In ICORE 2009 (2009)
Garcin, F., Faltings, B., Jurca, R., Joswig, N.: Rating aggregation in collaborative filtering systems. In: Proceedings of the Third ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, RecSys 2009. ACM, New York (2009)
Gorner, J., Zhang, J., Cohen, R.: Improving the use of advisor networks for multi-agent trust modelling. In: Privacy, Security and Trust (2011)
Griffiths, N.: Task delegation using experience-based multi-dimensional trust. In: AAMAS 2005. ACM (2005)
Huber, P., Ronchetti, E.: Robust statistics, vol. 10(1002). Wiley, NJ (2009)
Jindal, N., Liu, B.: Opinion spam and analysis. In: WSDM 2008. ACM (2008)
Jøsang, A., Ismail, R., Boyd, C.: A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decis. Support Syst. 43 (2007)
Jurca, R., Garcin, F., Talwar, A., Faltings, B.: Reporting incentives and biases in online review forums. ACM Trans. Web 4(2) (April 2010)
Mayzlin, D., Dover, Y., Chevalier, J.A.: Promotional reviews: An empirical investigation of online review manipulation. Working Paper 18340, National Bureau of Economic Research (August 2012)
Mobasher, B., Burke, R., Bhaumik, R., Williams, C.: Toward trustworthy recommender systems: An analysis of attack models and algorithm robustness. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 7(4) (October 2007)
Mukherjee, A., Liu, B., Glance, N.: Spotting fake reviewer groups in consumer reviews. In: WWW 2012. ACM (2012)
Ott, M., Choi, Y., Cardie, C., Hancock, J.T.: Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination. In: Proc. of ACL: HLT, vol. 1 (2011)
Rice, J.: Mathematical Statistics And Data Analysis. Number p. 3 in Duxbury Advanced Series. Brooks/Cole CENGAGE Learning (2007)
Rubino, M.: Albergatori contro Expedia e Booking. L’Antitrust avvia un’istruttoria. La Repubblica (Italian edition, online) (May 19, 2014), http://goo.gl/U4guRQ
Schneider, J., Kortuem, G., Jager, J., Fickas, S., Segall, Z.: Disseminating trust information in wearable communities. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 4 (2000)
Smith, M.D.: Fake reviews plague consumer websites. The Guardian (online ed.) (January 2013), http://gu.com/p/3d9qy
Staff writers. Choice warns TripAdvisor users to be aware of fake hotel reviews. Herald Sun (online ed.) (November 2013), http://goo.gl/94Qbdq
D. Streitfeld. The best book reviews money can buy. New York Times (online ed.) (August 2012), http://goo.gl/3vuB4
van Deursen, T., Koster, P., Petkovic, M.: Hedaquin: A reputation-based health data quality indicator. Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 197(2) (2008)
Wei, W.W.-S.: Time series analysis, 2nd edn. Pearson Addison-Wesley (2006)
Whitby, A., Jøsang, A., Indulska, J.: Filtering out unfair ratings in bayesian reputation systems. In: Workshop on Trust in Agent Societies (2004)
Yu, B., Singh, M.P.: Detecting deception in reputation management. In: AAMAS 2003. ACM (2003)
Zacharia, G., Moukas, A., Maes, P.: Collaborative reputation mechanisms in electronic marketplaces. In: HICSS (1999)
Zhang, J., Cohen, R.: Trusting advice from other buyers in e-marketplaces: the problem of unfair ratings. In: ICEC (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Di Pietro, R., Petrocchi, M., Spognardi, A. (2014). A Lot of Slots – Outliers Confinement in Review-Based Systems. In: Benatallah, B., Bestavros, A., Manolopoulos, Y., Vakali, A., Zhang, Y. (eds) Web Information Systems Engineering – WISE 2014. WISE 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8786. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11749-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11749-2_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11748-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11749-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)