Abstract
The BDI model, as a practical reasoning architecture aims at making decisions about what to do based on cognitives notions as beliefs, desires and intentions. However, during the decision making process, BDI agents also have to make background decisions like choosing what intention to achieve next from a set of possibly conflicting desires; which plan to execute from the plans that satisfy a given intention; and whether it is necessary or not to reconsider current intentions. Likewise, agreement technologies have proven to be effective mechanisms to reach agreements between agents with different preferences, as well as to conciliate different criteria within a single agent. Therefore, in this work, we present an abstract framework which incorporates agreement technologies in decision processes within BDI agents. Besides, from the mechanisms belonging to the research field of agreement technologies, a voting-based approach is also proposed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Benfield, S.S., Hendrickson, J., Galanti, D.: Making a strong business case for multiagent technology. In: 5th AAMAS (2006)
Bratman, M., Israel, D., Pollack, M.: Plans and resource bounded reasoning. Computational Intelligence 4(4), 349–355 (1988)
Wooldridge, M.: Reasoning about Rational Agents. The MIT Press (2000)
Kinny, D.N.: Commitment and effectiveness of situated agents. In: 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 82–88 (1991)
Schut, M., Wooldridge, M., Parsons, S.: The theory and practice of intention reconsideration. JETAI 16(4), 261–293 (2004)
Black, D.: The Theory of Committees and Elections. CUP, Campridge (1958)
Pollack, M.E., Ringuette, M.: Introducing the tileworld: Experimentally evaluating agent architectures. In: 8th AAAI, pp. 183–189 (1990)
Casali, A., Godo, L., Sierra, C.: A graded BDI agent model to represent and reason about preferences. Artifical Intelligence 175(7–8), 1468–1478 (2011)
Amgoud, L.: A Formal Framework for Handling Conflicting Desires. In: Nielsen, T.D., Zhang, N.L. (eds.) ECSQARU 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2711, pp. 552–563. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Sosa-Toranzo, C., Errecalde, M., Ferretti, E.: A framework for multi-criteria argumentation-based decision making within a BDI agent. JCS&T 14(1) (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Toranzo, C.S., Errecalde, M., Ferretti, E. (2014). On the Use of Agreement Technologies for Multi-criteria Decision Making within a BDI Agent. In: Bazzan, A., Pichara, K. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence -- IBERAMIA 2014. IBERAMIA 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8864. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12027-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12027-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12026-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12027-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)