Skip to main content

Semantic Monitoring and Compensation in Socio-technical Processes

  • Conference paper
Advances in Conceptual Modeling (ER 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8823))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Socio-technical processes are becoming increasingly important, with the growing recognition of the computational limits of full automation, the growth in popularity of crowd sourcing, the complexity and openness of modern organizations etc. A key challenge in managing socio-technical processes is dealing with the flexible, and sometimes dynamic, nature of the execution of human-mediated tasks. It is well-recognized that human execution does not always conform to predetermined coordination models, and is often error-prone. This paper addresses the problem of semantically monitoring the execution of socio-technical processes to check for non-conformance, and the problem of recovering from (or compensating for) non-conformance. This paper proposes a semantic solution to the problem, by leveraging semantically annotated process models to detect non-conformance, and using the same semantic annotations to identify compensatory human-mediated tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rozinat, A., van der Aalst, W.: Conformance checking of processes based on monitoring real behavior. Information Systems 33(1), 64–95 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fensel, D., Facca, F., Simperl, E.: Web Service Modeling Ontology. In: Semantic Web Services, pp. 107–129. Springer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fensel, D., Lausen, H., Polleres, A., Bruijn, J., Stollberg, M., Roman, D., Domingue, J.: Enabling Semantic Web Services: The Web Service Modeling Ontology. Springer (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hepp, M., Leymann, F., Domingue, J., Wahler, A., Fensel, D.: Semantic business process management: A vision towards using semantic Web services for business process management. In: IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering, pp. 535–540. IEEE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hinge, K., Ghose, A., Koliadis, G.: Process SEER: A tool for semantic effect annotation of business process models. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International EDOC Conference. IEEE Computer Society Process (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Di Pietro, I., Pagliarecci, F., Spalazzi, L.: Model checking semantically annotated services. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 38, 592–608 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith, F., Proietti, M.: Rule-Based Behavioral Reasoning on Semantic Business Processes. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence, pp. 130–143. SciTePress (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weber, I., Hoffmann, J., Mendling, J.: Beyond soundness: On the verification of semantic business process models. Distributed and Parallel Databases 27, 271–343 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Di Francescomarino, C., Ghidini, C., Rospocher, M., Serafini, L., Tonella, P.: Semantcally-aided business process modeling. In: Bernstein, A., Karger, D.R., Heath, T., Feigenbaum, L., Maynard, D., Motta, E., Thirunarayan, K. (eds.) ISWC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5823, pp. 114–129. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghose, A., Koliadis, G.: Auditing Business Process Compliance. In: Krämer, B.J., Lin, K.-J., Narasimhan, P. (eds.) ICSOC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4749, pp. 169–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Martin, D., et al.: Bringing semantics to web services: The OWL-S approach. In: Cardoso, J., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) SWSWPC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3387, pp. 26–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Meyer, H.: On the Semantics of Service Compositions. In: Marchiori, M., Pan, J.Z., de Sainte Marie, C. (eds.) RR 2007. LNCS, vol. 4524, pp. 31–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Montali, M., Pesic, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Chesani, F., Mello, P., Storari, S.: Declarative specification and verification of service choreographiess. ACM Transactions on the Web 4, 3:1–3:62 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smith, F., Missikoff, M., Proietti, M.: Ontology-Based Querying of Composite Services. In: Ardagna, C.A., Damiani, E., Maciaszek, L.A., Missikoff, M., Parkin, M. (eds.) BSME 2010. LNCS, vol. 7350, pp. 159–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Ginsberg, M.L., Smith, D.E.: Reasoning about action I: A Possible World Approach. Artificial Intelligence 35(2), 165–195 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Cook, J.E., Wolf, A.L.: Software process validation: quantitatively measuring the correspondence of a process to a model. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 8(2), 147–176 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghose, A., Koliadis, G.: Actor eco-systems: From high-level agent models to executable processes via semantic annotations. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference, vol. 02, pp. 177–184. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Koliadis, G., Vranesevic, A., Bhuiyan, M., Krishna, A., Ghose, A.K.: A combined approach for supporting the business process model lifecycle. In: Proceedings of the, Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1305–1319 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Klein, M., Dellarocas, C.: A knowledge-based approach to handling exceptions in workflow systems. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 9, 399–412 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gou, Y., Ghose, A., Chang, CF., Dam, H.K., Miller, A. (2014). Semantic Monitoring and Compensation in Socio-technical Processes. In: Indulska, M., Purao, S. (eds) Advances in Conceptual Modeling. ER 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8823. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12256-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12256-4_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12255-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12256-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics