Skip to main content

On Ethical, Legal and Social Issues of Care Robots

  • Chapter
Intelligent Assistive Robots

Part of the book series: Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics ((STAR,volume 106))

Abstract

According to recent figures, in the next years, Western developed societies will be supposed to face the “aging problem”. The population aged 60 will surpass that of younger people and, to make things even worst, current trends in social relations indicate that family carers are no more willing to look after their older relatives. Such a situation has given more emphasis to the rise of robotics as a possible solution to deal with the demographic change and the new social norms in the care of elderly and disabled people. The ways in which robotics has been proposed to address the “aging problem” are manifold: ranging from humanoids, general purpose robots, to less invasive, distributed and task-specific systems. This chapter intends to provide the reader with an overview of the main ethical, legal and societal challenges concerning the use of care robots.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Vallor, S.: Carebots and Caregivers: Sustaining the Ethical Ideal of Care in the Twenty-First Century. Philosophy & Technology 24(3), 251–268 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. ISO 13482 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Global watch index 2013 by ONU and Help age international (2013), http://www.helpage.org/global-agewatch/ (accessed December 10, 2013)

  4. WHO 2013 World Health Organisation, http://www.who.int/topics/ageing/en (accessed December 10, 2013)

  5. Graham, J.: A shortage of caregivers. The New York Times (February 26, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beckford, M.: Elderly suffer poor care in half of NHS hospitals. The Telegraph (October 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Atanackovic, J., Bourgeault, I.L.: Economic and Social integration of immigrant live-in.caregivers in Canada, IRPP Study, No 46 (April 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sharkey, A., Sharkey, N.: Granny and the robots: Ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics and Information Technology 14, 27–40 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Verruggio, G.: The birth of roboethics. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation Workshop on Robo-Ethics, ICRA 2005, Barcelona, Spain, April 18 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Von Schomberg, R.: A vision of responsible innovation. In: Owen, R., Heintz, M., Bessant, J. (eds.) Responsible Innovation. John Wiley, London (2013) (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Parks, J.A.: Lifting the Burden of Women’s Care Work: Should Robots Replace the “Human Touch”? Hypatia 25(1), 100–120 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. van der Plas, A., Smitsb, M., Wehrmannc, C.: Beyond Speculative Robot Ethics: A Vision Assessment Study on the Future of the Robotic Caretaker. Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance 17(6) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Borenstein, J., Pearson, Y.: Robot caregivers: harbingers of expanded freedom for all? Ethics and Information Technology archive 12(3), 277–288 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mitzner, T.L., Chen, T.L., Kemp, C.C., Rogers, W.A.: Identifying the Potential for Robotics to Assist Older Adults in Different Living Environments. International Journal of Social Robotics (November 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Coeckelbergh, M.: Human development or human enhancement? A methodological reflection on capabilities and the evaluation of information technologies. Ethics of Information Technologies 13, 81–92 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Borenstein, J., Pearson, Y.: Robot Caregivers: Ethical Issues across the Human Lifespan. In: Lin, P., Abney, K., Bekey, G.A. (eds.) Robot Ethics. MIT Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Datteri, E., Tamburrini, G.: Ethical Reflections on Health Care Robotics. In: Ethics and Robotics. IOS Pres (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Charter of Fundamental Rights of The European Union (2000/C 364/01)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Feil-Seifer, D.J., Matarić, M.J.: Ethical Principles for Socially Assistive Robotics. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 18(1), 24–31 (2011); Special issue on Roboethics, Veruggio, J.S., Van der loos, M.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. van Wynsberghe, A.: Designing Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-Sensitive Design. Sci. Eng. Ethics 19, 407–433 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nylander, S., Ljungblad, S., Jiménez Villarreal, J.: A complementing approach for identifying ethical issues in care robotics - grounding ethics in practical use. In: RO-MAN 2012, pp. 797–802 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Special Eurobarometer 382. Public Attitudes Towards Robots Report. Fieldwork: February - March 2012 Publication (September 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Oppenauer-Meerskraut, C.: Would a Virtual Butler Do a Good Job for Old People? Psychological Considerations about Benefits and Risks of Technological Assistance. In: Trappl, R. (ed.) Your Virtual Butler. LNCS, vol. 7407, pp. 11–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. EUROP (European Robotics Technology Platform). Robotic Visions. To 2020 and Beyond, The Strategic Research Agenda for Robotics in Europe (July 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sparrow, R.: The March of the Robot Dogs. Journal Ethics and Information Technology Archive 4(4) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shibata, T., Kawaguchi, Y., Wada, K.: Investigation on People Living with Paro at Home. Effects of Sex Difference and Owners’ Animal Preference. In: The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Toyama, Japan, September 27-October 2 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places (Center for the Study of Language and Information Publication Lecture Notes) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Turkle, S.: Authenticity in the age of digital companions. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 8(3) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sanfeliu, A., Punsola, A., Yoshimura, Y., Llácer, M.D., Gramunt, M.R.: Legal Challenges for Networking Robots Deployment in European Urban Areas: The Privacy Issue. In: Workshop on Network Robots Systems, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2009), Kobe (Japan), May 12 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lehman-Wilzig, S.N.: Frankenstein Unbound: Toward a Legal Definition of Artificial Intelligence. Futures: The Journal of Forecasting and Planning 13 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stradella, E., Salvini, P., Pirni, A., Di Carlo, A., Oddo, C.M., Dario, P., Palmerini, E.: Robot Companions as Case-Scenario for Assessing the “Subjectivity” of Autonomous Agents. Some Philosophical and Legal Remarks. In: 1st Workshop on Rights and Duties of Autonomous Agents (RDA2) ECAI, The Biennial European Conference in Artificial Intelligence, Montpellier, France, August 28 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Beck, S.: Legal Liability of Machines. In: Flagship RoboCom - Rise of Sentient Machines? Robot, 2012 Companions for Citizens, May 22. Diaconis Tagungszentrum Blumenberg, Bern (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Salvini, P., Teti, G., Spadoni, E., Frediani, E., Boccalatte, S., Nocco, L., Mazzolai, B., Laschi, C., Comandé, G., Rossi, E., Carrozza, P., Dario, P.: An investigation on legal implications of service robots deployment in urban areas. Advanced Robotics 24(13) (October 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Markoff, J.: Google cars drive themselves, in traffic. The New York Times (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Showalter, S.: The Legal Status of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles. The Marine Technology Society Journal Spring 38(1) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Leroux, C., Labruto, R. (eds.): Proposals for a Green Book on the Legal Regulation of the Production and Application of Robots, Draft version 2.0 – January 5th 2012, euRobotics (FP7-ICT-2009-4, Grant Agreement Number 248552) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Robot-Era, European Funded project FP72007-201, GA 288899, http://www.robot-era.eu/robotera/

  38. Tronto, J.: Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pericle Salvini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Salvini, P. (2015). On Ethical, Legal and Social Issues of Care Robots. In: Mohammed, S., Moreno, J., Kong, K., Amirat, Y. (eds) Intelligent Assistive Robots. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, vol 106. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12922-8_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12922-8_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12921-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12922-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics