Skip to main content

The Development and Validation of a Traceability Assessment Model

  • Conference paper
Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination (SPICE 2014)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 477))

Abstract

Regulation normally requires critical systems to be certified before entering service. This involves submission of a safety case - a reasoned argument and supporting evidence that stringent requirements have been met and that the system is acceptably safe. A good safety case encompasses an effective risk mitigation process which is highly dependent on requirements traceability. However despite its many benefits and regulatory requirements, most existing software systems lack explicit traceability links between artefacts. Reasons for the lack of traceability include cost, complexity and lack of guidance on how to implement traceability.To assist medical device organisations in addressing the lack of guidance on how to implement effective traceability, this paper aims to present the development and validation of a traceability process assessment model and the actions to be taken as a result of the validation. The process assessment model will allow organisations to identify strengths and weaknesses in their existing traceability process and pinpoint areas for improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. RTCA, DO-178B Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification, ed. Washington, DC (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  2. CENELEC, Railway applications – Communications, signalling and processing systems – Software for railway control and protection systems ed. (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. ANSI/AAMI/IEC, 62304:2006 Medical device software—Software life cycle processes, ed. Arlington, VA: AAMI (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lucia, A.D., et al.: Information Retrieval Methods for Automated Traceability Recovery. In: Cleland-Huang, J., et al. (eds.) Software and Systems Traceability, pp. 88–111. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cleland-Huang, J.: Just Enough Requirements Traceability. Presented at the Proceedings of the 30th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference, vol. 01 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kannenberg, A., Saiedian, D.H.: Why Software Requirements Traceability Remains a Challenge. CrossTalk The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, p. 5 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jarke, M.: Requirements tracing. Commun. ACM 41, 32–36 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Regan, G., et al.: The Barriers to Traceability and their Potential Solutions: Towards a Reference Framework. Presented at the 38th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, Cesme, Turkey (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. McCaffery, F., Casey, V.: Med-Trace: Traceability Assessment Method for Medical Device Software Development. Presented at the EuroSPI Denmark (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mader, P., et al.: Motivation Matters in the Traceability Trenches. Presented at the Proceedings of the 2009 17th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. ISO/IEC, 15504-5: An exemplar Process Assessment Model, ed. Switzerland: ISO (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sig, A.: Automotive SPICE® Process Assessment Model, ed (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. ECCS, Space Product Assurance- Software process assessment and improvement – Part 2: Assessor instrument, ed. Netherlands: ESA Requirements and Standards Division (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. E. Institute, CMMI® for Development, Version 1.3, in Improving processes for developing better products and services, ed. (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. ISO/IEC, 12207: Systems and software engineering — Software life cycle processes, ed. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Regan, G., et al.: Implementation of traceability best practices within the medical device domain. Presented at the EuroSPI 2013, Dundalk, Ireland (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Barafort, B., et al.: A transformation process for building PRMs and PAMs based on a collection of requirements – Example with ISO/IEC 20000. Presented at the SPICE, Nuremberg, Germany (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Regan, G., McCaffery, F., McDaid, K., Flood, D. (2014). The Development and Validation of a Traceability Assessment Model. In: Mitasiunas, A., Rout, T., O’Connor, R.V., Dorling, A. (eds) Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. SPICE 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 477. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13036-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13036-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13035-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13036-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics