Skip to main content

Segmented and Interactive Modules for Teaching Secure Coding: A Pilot Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
E-Learning, E-Education, and Online Training (eLEOT 2014)

Abstract

Learners can experience content disorientation in web based learning modules. The security injection modules developed by Towson University have increased students’ secure coding awareness and ability to apply secure coding principles, but feedback from instructors indicate that students tend to skim or skip the module contents and proceed directly to the laboratory assignment. In this paper, we describe the factors that cause cognitive overload in hypertext readers and address the pertinent issues and describe the process we used to enhance the effectiveness of the modules. Security Injections 2.0 incorporates principles of segmentation - breaking large module content into smaller sections and presenting each section one at a time, dialoguing - answering questions and receiving corrective or explanatory feedback, and controlling - reading and learning content at learners own pace. Segmentation, dialoguing, and controlling engage learners and retain concepts. Pilot study results indicate 77 % of the students scored above 70 % in concept retention assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Al-Samarraie, H., Teo, T., Abbas, M.: Can structured representation enhance students’ thinking skills for better understanding of E-learning content? Comput. Educ. 69, 463–473 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chalmers, P.A.: The role of cognitive theory in human–computer interface. Comput. Hum. Behav. 19(5), 593–607 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Clark, R.C., Mayer, R.E.: E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning (Google eBook). Wiley, New York (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. DeStefano, D., LeFevre, J.-A.: Cognitive load in hypertext reading: a review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23(3), 1616–1641 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Duggan, G.B., Payne, S.J.: Skim reading by satisficing: evidence from eye tracking. In: CHI 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dyson, M., Haselgrove, M.: The effects of reading speed and reading patterns on the understanding of text read from screen. J. Res. Reading 23(2), 210–223 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaza, S., Taylor, B., Hochheiser, H., Azadegan, S., O’Leary, M., Turner, C.F.: Injecting security in the curriculum – experiences in effective dissemination and assessment design. In: The Colloquium for Information Systems Security Education (CISSE), 8 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lawless, K.A., Brown, S.W., Mills, R.: Knowledge, interest, recall and navigation: a look at hypertext processing. J. Literacy Res. 35, 911–934 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, Z.: Reading behavior in the digital environment: changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. J. Documentation 61(6), 700–712 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. van Merrienboer, J.J.G., Ayres, P.: Research on cognitive load theory and its design implications for e-learning. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 53(3), 5–13 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. van Merrienboer, J.J.G., John, S.: Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Med. Educ. 44, 85–93 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Moreno, R., Mayer, R.: Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 19(3), 309–326 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Protopsaltis, A., Bouk, V.: Towards a hypertext reading/comprehension model. In: SIGDOC’05 (2005). http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/1090000/1085349/p159-protopsaltis.pdf

  14. Singh, A.-M., Marcus, N., Ayres, P.: The transient information effect: investigating the impact of segmentation on spoken and written text. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 26(6), 848–853 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Taylor, B., Kaza, S.: Security injections: modules to help students remember, understand, and apply secure coding techniques. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual Joint Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 99, 3–7, ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tseng, M.: The difficulties that EFL learners have with reading text on the web. Internet TESL J. 14(2) (2008). Available at http://iteslj.org/Articles/Tseng-TextOnTheWeb.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sagar Raina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Cite this paper

Raina, S., Kaza, S., Taylor, B. (2014). Segmented and Interactive Modules for Teaching Secure Coding: A Pilot Study. In: Vincenti, G., Bucciero, A., Vaz de Carvalho, C. (eds) E-Learning, E-Education, and Online Training. eLEOT 2014. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 138. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13293-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13293-8_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13292-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13293-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics