Skip to main content

Towards Personalized Biomechanical Model and MIND-Weighted Point Matching for Robust Deformable MR-TRUS Registration

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer-Assisted and Robotic Endoscopy (CARE 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 8899))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper explores a novel deformable MR-TRUS registration method, which uses a personalized statistical motion model and a robust point matching strategy that is boosted by the modality independent neighborhood descriptor (MIND) algorithm. Current deformable MR-TRUS registration methods limit to inaccurate deformation estimation and unstable point correspondence. To precisely estimate tissue deformation, we construct a personalized statistical motion model (PSMM) on the basis of finite element methods and patient-specific biomechanical properties that were detected by ultrasound elastography. To accurately obtain the point correspondence between surface point sets segmented from MR and TRUS images, we first adopt the PSMM to provide realistic boundary conditions for point correspondence estimation. We further introduce the MIND to weight a robust point matching procedure. We evaluate our method on five datasets from volunteers. The experimental results demonstrate that our novel approach provides more accurate and robust MR-TRUS registration than state-of-the-art methods. The current target registration error was significantly improved from 2.6 to 1.8 mm. which completely meets the clinical requirement of less than 2.5 mm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Siegel, R., Ma, J., Zou, Z., Jemal, A.: Cancer statistics, 2014. CA. Cancer. J. Clin. 64, 9–29 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guichard, G., Larr, S., Gallina, A., Lazar, A., Faucon, H., Chemama, S., Allory, Y., Patard, J., Vordos, D., Hoznek, A., Yiou, R., Salomon, L., Abbou, C.C., Taille, A.: Extended 21-sample needle biopsy protocol for diagnosis of prostate cancer in 1000 consecutive patients. Eur. Urol. 52, 430–435 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmed, H.U., Kirkham, A., Arya, M., Illing, R., Freeman, A., Allen, C., Emberton, M.: Is it time to consider a role for MRI before prostate biopsy. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 6(4), 197–206 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hu, Y., Ahmed, H.U., Taylor, Z., Allen, C., Emberton, M., Hawkes, D., Barratt, D.: MR to ultrasound registration for image-guided prostate interventions. MedIA. 16(3), 687–703 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sotiras, A., Davatzikos, C., Paragios, N.: Deformable medical image registration: A survey. IEEE. Trans. Med. Imaging 32(7), 1153–1190 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Correas, J.M., Tissier, A.M., Khairoune, A., Khoury, G., Eiss, D., Hlnon, O.: Ultrasound elastography of the prostate: State of the art. Diagn. Interv. Imaging 94, 551–560 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chui, H., Rangarajan, A.: A new point matching algorithm for non-rigid registration. Comput. Vision. Image. Underst. 89, 114–141 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang, J., Williams, J.P., Sun, Y., Blum, R.S., Xu, C.: A robust hybrid method for nonrigid image registration. Pattern. Recogn. 44(4), 764–776 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Heinrich, M.P., Jenkinson, M., Bhushan, M., Matin, T., Gleeson, F.V., Brady, S.M., Schnabel, J.A.: MIND: Modality independent neighbourhood descriptor for multi-modal deformable registration. Media 16(7), 1423–1435 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Poston, T., Wong, T.T., Heng, P.A.: Multiresolution isosurface extraction with adaptive skeleton climbing. Comput. Graph. Forum 17, 137–148 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Krouskop, T.A., Wheeler, T.M., Kallel, F., Garra, B.S., Hall, T.: Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrasonic. Imaging 20, 260–274 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work described in this paper was supported in part by a grant from the Innovation and Technology Fund of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (Project No. GHP/003/11SZ), in part by a grant from Shenzhen-Hong Kong Innovation Circle Funding Program (No. JSE201109150013A), in part by a grant from Shenzhen Basic Research Project (Project No: JCYJ20120619152326448), in part by a grant from Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong (Project No: S2013010014973), in part by a grant from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council General Research Fund (Project No. 412513).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong Ni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wang, Y. et al. (2014). Towards Personalized Biomechanical Model and MIND-Weighted Point Matching for Robust Deformable MR-TRUS Registration. In: Luo, X., Reichl, T., Mirota, D., Soper, T. (eds) Computer-Assisted and Robotic Endoscopy. CARE 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8899. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13410-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13410-9_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13409-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13410-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics