Skip to main content

Measuring User Acceptance of Wearable Symbiotic Devices: Validation Study Across Application Scenarios

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Symbiotic Interaction (Symbiotic 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8820))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2201 Accesses

Abstract

Wearable devices detecting users’ psycho-physiological parameters and providing related feedback are an important component of intelligent systems adapting to users’ cognitive and affective states. However, issues related to perceived comfort and privacy might compromise users’ intention to use them in real contexts. To measure users’ acceptance of these devices, we built a questionnaire that includes key dimensions of the TAM model [7, 15], such as perceived usefulness, effort expectancy, psychological attachment, facilitating conditions, and some dimensions that are especially relevant to wearable symbiotic systems (e.g., perceived comfort, and perceived privacy). This questionnaire was administered to 110 respondents with reference to three devices (i.e., smart -shirt, portable EEG system, and eye-tracking glasses) and six usage scenarios (dangerous work, heavy work, sport, homecare, research, retail).

After validation, 26 items were retained for the analysis and their factorial structure clarified. Perceived usefulness, perceived comfort/pleasantness, facilitating conditions, and attitude toward technology are good predictors of acceptance. The effects of scenario, device, and expertise are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The retail scenario is a very common one in everyday life, so general users can hardly be considered as non-experts in it.

References

  1. Buenaflor, C.B., Kim, H.C.K.: Six human factors to acceptability of wearable computers. Int. J. Multimed. Ubiquitous Eng. 8, 103–114 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barfield, W., Mann, S., Baird, K., Gemperle, F., Kasabach, C., Stivoric, J., Cho, G.: Computational Clothing and Accessories. Fundamentals of Wearable Computers and Augmented Reality. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Duval, S., Hoareau, C., Hashizume, H.: Humanistic needs as seeds. In: Wong, W.K., Guo, Z.X. (eds.) Smart Clothing, pp. 153–187. Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Knight, J.F., Deen-Williams, D., Arvanitis, T.N., Baber, C., Sotiriou, S., Anastopoulou, S., Gargalakos, M.: Assessing the wearability of wearable computers. In: 10th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, pp. 75–82. IEEE Computer Society (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Allanson, J., Fairclough, S.H.: A research agenda for physiological computing. Interact. Comput. 16, 857–878 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dillon, A.: User acceptance of information technology. In: Karwowski, W. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Human Factors and Ergonomics. Taylor and Francis, London (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425–478 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Knight, J.F., Baber, C.: A tool to assess the comfort of wearable computers. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 47, 77–91 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rico, J., Brewster, S: Usable gestures for mobile interfaces: evaluating social acceptability. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘10), pp. 887–896. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Britz, J.: Technology as a threat to privacy: ethical challenges and guidelines for the information professionals. Microcomput. Inf. Manage. 13, 175–193 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tavani, H.T.: Genomic research and data-mining technology: implications for personal privacy and informed consent. Ethics Inf. Technol. 6, 15–28 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. DeVries, M.: Pupils’ Attitude Towards Technology (PATT) - USA Instrument (1988). http://www.iteaconnect.org/Conference/PATT/PATTSI/PATTSurveyInstrument.pdf. Accessed February 2014

  13. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage. Sci. 46, 186–204 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Meuter, M.L., Ostrom, A.L., Bitner, M.J., Roundtree, R.: The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies. J. Bus. Res. 56, 899–906 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Davis, F.D.: A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Malhotra, Y., Galletta, D. F.: Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: theoretical bases and empirical validation. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, HICSS-32. p. 14. IEEE Computer Society (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kaplan, S., Okur, A.: The meaning and importance of clothing comfort: a case study for Turkey. J. Sens. Stud. 23, 688–706 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Perera, G., Holbrook, A., Thabane, L., Foster, G., Willison, D.J.: Views on health information sharing and privacy from primary care practices using electronic medical records. Int. J. Med. Inf. 80, 94–101 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ziefle, M., Rocker, C.: Acceptance of pervasive healthcare systems: a comparison of different implementation concepts. In: 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), pp. 1–6. IEEE Computer Society (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bergmann, J.H.M., McGregor, A.H.: Body-worn sensor design: what do patients and clinicians want? Ann. Biomed. Eng. 39, 2299–2312 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bodine, K., Gemperle, F.: Effects of functionality on perceived comfort of wearables. In 16th International Symposium on Wearable Computers, pp. 57–57. IEEE Computer Society (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jacucci, G., Spagnolli, A., Freeman, J., Gamberini, L.: Symbiotic interaction: a critical definition and comparison to other human-computer paradigms. In: Proceedings of Symbiotic 2014: Third International Workshop on Symbiotic Interaction. Springer, London (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the European Project CEEDS (N: 258749; Call: ICT 2009.8.4 Human - Computer Confluence). The authors would also like to thank the participants and the following organizations: Associazione “La casa azzurra”; Centro sociale per anziani età d’oro; Comando provinciale dei vigili del fuoco di Padova; Siderurgica Ravennate Srl; Dipartimento Psicologia Generale, Università di Padova. The authors are also grateful to Enrico Tonini for advising about the statistic analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Spagnolli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Spagnolli, A., Guardigli, E., Orso, V., Varotto, A., Gamberini, L. (2014). Measuring User Acceptance of Wearable Symbiotic Devices: Validation Study Across Application Scenarios. In: Jacucci, G., Gamberini, L., Freeman, J., Spagnolli, A. (eds) Symbiotic Interaction. Symbiotic 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8820. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13500-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13500-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13499-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13500-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics