Skip to main content

Closed-World Concept Induction for Learning in OWL Knowledge Bases

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8876))

Abstract

We present a general-purpose method for inducing OWL class descriptions over data and knowledge captured with RDF and OWL in a closed-world way. We combine our approach with a top-down refinement-based search with Description Logic (DL) expressions which incorporates OWL background knowledge. Our methods are designed for speed and scalability to support analysis tasks like data mining over large knowledge-rich data sets. We compare our methods to a state-of-the-art DL learning tool with respect to a large benchmark problem to demonstrate the speed and effectiveness of our approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Newman, J., Bolton, E.E., Müller-Dieckmann, J., Fazio, V.J., Gallagher, D.T., Lovell, D., Luft, J.R., Peat, T.S., Ratcliffe, D., Sayle, R.A., Snell, E.H., Taylor, K., Vallotton, P., Velanker, S., von Delft, F.: On the need for an international effort to capture, share and use crystallization screening data. Acta Crystallographica Section F Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications 68(3), 253–258 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Klein, J., Jupp, S., Moulos, P., Fernandez, M., Buffin-Meyer, B., Casemayou, A., Chaaya, R., Charonis, A., Bascands, J.L., Stevens, R., Schanstra, J.P.: The KUPKB: a novel web application to access multiomics data on kidney disease. FASEB Journal: official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology 26(5), 2145–2153 (2012) PMID: 22345404

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lehmann, J.: DL-learner: Learning concepts in description logics. Journal of Machine Learning Research 10, 2639–2642 (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Iannone, L., Palmisano, I., Fanizzi, N.: An algorithm based on counterfactuals for concept learning in the semantic web. Applied Intelligence 26(2), 139–159 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fanizzi, N., d’Amato, C., Esposito, F.: DL-FOIL concept learning in description logics. In: Železný, F., Lavrač, N. (eds.) ILP 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5194, pp. 107–121. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Ławrynowicz, A., Potoniec, J.: Fr-ONT: An algorithm for frequent concept mining with formal ontologies. In: Kryszkiewicz, M., Rybinski, H., Skowron, A., Raś, Z.W. (eds.) ISMIS 2011. LNCS, vol. 6804, pp. 428–437. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The description logic handbook: theory, implementation, and applications. Cambridge University Press, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tao, J., Sirin, E., Bao, J., McGuinness, D.L.: Integrity constraints in owl. In: AAAI2010: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kazakov, Y.: RIQ and SROIQ are harder than SHOIQ. In: Proc. KR 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lehmann, J., Auer, S., Bühmann, L., Tramp, S.: Class expression learning for ontology engineering. Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 9(1), 71–81 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lehmann, J., Hitzler, P.: Concept learning in description logics using refinement operators. Machine Learning 78, 203–250 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Tao, J.: Integrity Constraints for the Semantic Web: An OWL2-DL Extension. PhD thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA, AAI3530046 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Horridge, M., Bechhofer, S.: The OWL API: a java API for OWL ontologies. Semantic Web 2(1), 11–21 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sirin, E., Parsia, B., Grau, B.C., Kalyanpur, A., Katz, Y.: Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 5(2), 51–53 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ratcliffe, D., Taylor, K., Newman, J.: Ontology-based machine learning for protein crystallisation. In: Australasian Ontology Workshop (AOW 2011), Perth, Australia, vol. 132, CRPIT (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ratcliffe, D., Taylor, K. (2014). Closed-World Concept Induction for Learning in OWL Knowledge Bases. In: Janowicz, K., Schlobach, S., Lambrix, P., Hyvönen, E. (eds) Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. EKAW 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8876. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13704-9_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13704-9_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13703-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13704-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics