Skip to main content

Mobile Image Analysis: Android vs. iOS

  • Conference paper
MultiMedia Modeling (MMM 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8936))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Currently, computer vision applications are becoming more common on mobile devices due to the constant increase in raw processing power coupled with extended battery life. The OpenCV framework is a popular choice when developing such applications on desktop computers as well as on mobile devices, but there are few comparative performance studies available. We know of only one such study that evaluates a set of typical OpenCV operations on iOS devices. In this paper we look at the same operations, spanning from simple image manipulation like grayscaling and blurring to keypoint detection and descriptor extraction but on flagship Android devices as well as on iOS devices and with different image resolutions. We compare the results of the same tests running on the two platforms on the same datasets and provide extended measurements on completion time and battery usage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alahi, A., Ortiz, R., Vandergheynst, P.: Freak: Fast retina keypoint. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 510–517 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bay, H., Tuytelaars, T., Van Gool, L.: SURF: Speeded up robust features. In: Leonardis, A., Bischof, H., Pinz, A. (eds.) ECCV 2006, Part I. LNCS, vol. 3951, pp. 404–417. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Calonder, M., Lepetit, V., Strecha, C., Fua, P.: BRIEF: Binary robust independent elementary features. In: Daniilidis, K., Maragos, P., Paragios, N. (eds.) ECCV 2010, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 6314, pp. 778–792. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Chatzilari, E., Liaros, G., Nikolopoulos, S., Kompatsiaris, Y.: A comparative study on mobile visual recognition. In: Perner, P. (ed.) MLDM 2013. LNCS, vol. 7988, pp. 442–457. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Cobârzan, C., Hudelist, M.A., Del Fabro, M.: Content-based video browsing with collaborating mobile clients. In: Gurrin, C., Hopfgartner, F., Hurst, W., Johansen, H., Lee, H., O’Connor, N. (eds.) MMM 2014, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8326, pp. 402–406. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Girod, B., Chandrasekhar, V., Chen, D.M., Cheung, N.-M., Grzeszczuk, R., Reznik, Y.A., Takacs, G., Tsai, S.S., Vedantham, R.: Mobile visual search. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hudelist, M.A., Cobârzan, C., Schoeffmann, K.: Opencv performance measurements on mobile devices. In: Proc. of Int. Conf. on Multimedia Retrieval ICMR 2014, Glasgow, United Kingdom, April 01-04, pp. 479–482 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leutenegger, S., Chli, M., Siegwart, R.: Brisk: Binary robust invariant scalable keypoints. In: IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 2548–2555 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lowe, D.: Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision 60(2), 91–110 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosten, E., Drummond, T.: Machine learning for high-speed corner detection. In: Leonardis, A., Bischof, H., Pinz, A. (eds.) ECCV 2006, Part I. LNCS, vol. 3951, pp. 430–443. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Rublee, E., Rabaud, V., Konolige, K., Bradski, G.: Orb: An efficient alternative to sift or surf. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 2564–2571 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schoeffmann, K., Ahlström, D., Bailer, W., Cobârzan, C., Hopfgartner, F., McGuinness, K., Gurrin, C., Frisson, C., Le, D.-D., Del Fabro, M., Bai, H., Weiss, W.: The video browser showdown: A live evaluation of interactive video search tools. International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shi, J., Tomasi, C.: Good features to track. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 593–600 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cobârzan, C., Hudelist, M.A., Schoeffmann, K., Primus, M.J. (2015). Mobile Image Analysis: Android vs. iOS. In: He, X., Luo, S., Tao, D., Xu, C., Yang, J., Hasan, M.A. (eds) MultiMedia Modeling. MMM 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8936. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14442-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14442-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14441-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14442-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics