Skip to main content

On the Diversity of Interdomain Routing in Africa

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Passive and Active Measurement (PAM 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCCN,volume 8995))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2333 Accesses

Abstract

With IP networking booming in Africa, promotion of BGP peering in the region emerge, and changes in the transit behavior of ISPs serving Africa are expected. However, little is known about the IP transit topology currently forming the African Internet. Enhancing the RIPE Atlas infrastructure, we evaluate the topology interconnecting ISPs based on the continent. We reveal a variety of ISP transit habits, depending on a range of factors such as the official language or the business profile of the ISP. We highlight the emergence of IXPs in Africa, evaluating its impact on end-to-end connectivity. Our results however emphasize the remaining dominance of ISPs based outside Africa, for the provision of intra-continental paths. We study the impact of this aspect on AS path length and end-to-end delay. Such results illustrate that performing measurements from a broad, diversified, range of vantage points is necessary to assess interdomain routing on the continent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this paper, we refer to countries using ISO 2-letter country codes, that we list in [15].

  2. 2.

    The raw data for these delay measurements can be found in [15].

  3. 3.

    We categorized the WAf ASes as public or private, based on gathered private information.

  4. 4.

    As of December 10, 2014, the RIPE Atlas platform has evolved to 318 probes hosted in 147 ASes and spread across 44 countries all over Africa [7].

References

  1. Les Cottrell, R.: How Bad Is Africa’s Internet? January 2013. http://spectrum.ieee.org/telecom/internet/how-bad-is-africas-internet

  2. Chetty, M., Sundaresan, S., Muckaden, S., Feamster, N., Calandro, E.: Measuring broadband performance in South Africa. In: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Symposium on Computing for Development, ACM DEV-4 ’13. ACM, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. African Union: Study On Harmonisation of Telecommunication, Information and Communication Technologies Policies and Regulation in Africa, March 2008. http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/projects/ITU_EC_ACP/hipssa/docs/2_Draft_Report_Study_on_Telecom_ICT_Policy_31_March_08.pdf

  4. African Union: African Internet eXchange System. http://pages.au.int/axis

  5. Gilmore, J., Huysamen, N., Cronje, P., de Klerk, M., Krzesinski, A.: Mapping the African internet. In: Proceedings Southern African Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (SATNAC), Mauritius, September 2007

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta, A., Calder, M., Feamster, N., Chetty, M., Calandro, E., Katz-Bassett, E.: Peering at the internet’s frontier: A first look at ISP interconnectivity in Africa. In: Faloutsos, M., Kuzmanovic, A. (eds.) PAM 2014. LNCS, vol. 8362, pp. 204–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. RIPE NCC: Global RIPE Atlas Network Coverage (2014). https://atlas.ripe.net/results/maps/network-coverage/

  8. Mao, Z.M., Rexford, J., Wang, J., Katz, R.: Towards an accurate AS-level traceroute tool. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, pp. 365–378 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Subramanian, L., Agarwal, S., Rexford, J., Katz, R.H.: Characterizing the internet hierarchy from multiple vantage points. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, p. 12 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haddadi, H., Rio, M., Moore, A.: Network topologies: inference, modeling, and generation. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 10(2), 48–69 (2008). IEEE

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hyun, Y.: Archipelago Infrastructure. http://www.caida.org/projects/ark

  12. PingER: PingER Project (2013). http://www-iepm.slac.stanford.edu/pinger/

  13. Augustin, B., Cuvellier, X., Orgogozo, B., Viger, F., Friedman, T., Latapy, M., Magnien, C., Teixera, R.: Avoiding traceroute anomalies with Paris traceroute. In: IMC ’06 Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, pp. 153–158, October 2006

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cristel, P., Luca, C., Stefano, V., Bush, R.: From Paris to Tokyo: On the suitability of ping to measure latency. In: IMC ’13 Proceedings of the 13th IMC, pp. 427–432 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fanou, R., Francois, P., Aben, E.: African measurement campaigns: Technical Report, September 2014. https://fourier.networks.imdea.org/external/techrep_amc/

  16. AFRINIC: AFRINIC database (2014). ftp://ftp.afrinic.net/

  17. Karlin, J., Forrest, S., Rexford, J.: Nation-state routing: Censorship, wiretapping, and BGP. CoRR, vol. abs/0903.3218 (2009). http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.3218

  18. RIPE NCC: OpenIPMap database (2014). https://labs.ripe.net/Members/emileaben/infrastructure-geolocation-plan-of-action

  19. MaxMind: GeoIP (2014). http://www.maxmind.com/en/geolocation_landing

  20. Team Cymru: Team Cymru Services. https://www.team-cymru.com/

  21. RouteViews Project (2005). http://routeviews.org

  22. RIPE, RIS: Raw data

    Google Scholar 

  23. Packet Clearing House (PCH): PCH IXP directory (2014). http://prefix.pch.net/images/applications/ixpdir/ip_asn_mapping.txt

  24. CAIDA: AS Relationships. http://www.caida.org/data/as-relationships

  25. PeeringDB. http://www.peeringdb.com/private/exchange_list.php

Download references

Acknowledgement

We are grateful to whoever deploys or hosts a RIPE Atlas probe. We also thank Michuki Mwangi, Nishal Goburdhan, Vesna Manojlovic, Andra Lutu, Camilo Cardona, Ignacio De Castro, and Pablo Camarillo for their insightful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodérick Fanou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fanou, R., Francois, P., Aben, E. (2015). On the Diversity of Interdomain Routing in Africa. In: Mirkovic, J., Liu, Y. (eds) Passive and Active Measurement. PAM 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8995. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15509-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15509-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15508-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15509-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics