Abstract
In this paper, we are concerned with a kind of spatial equilibria, the plurality points, in two-dimensional Euclidean space. Given a set of voters, each of which corresponds to a point, a plurality point is defined as a point closer to at least as many voters as any other point in the space. We generalize the definition by appending weights on the voters, and define the plurality point as a point \(\vartriangle\) satisfying that the sum of weights of the voters closer to \(\vartriangle\) is no less than that of the voters closer to any other point in the space. To remedy the issue of the non-existence of plurality points, we investigate the problem of eliminating some voters with minimum “cost” so that there is a plurality point with respect to the remaining voters. We show that the problem is NP-hard. Moreover, if all voters’ weights are restricted to be equal, we show that the problem can be solved in O(n5logn) time, where n is the number of voters.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bandelt, H.-J.: Networks with Condorcet solutions. European Journal of Operational Research 20(3), 314–326 (1985)
Bartholdi, J.J., Tovey, C.A., Trick, M.A.: How hard is it to control an election? Mathematical and Computer Modeling 16(8–9), 27–40 (1992)
Campos Rodríguez, C.M., Moreno Pérez, J.A.: Relaxation of the Condorcet and Simpson conditions in voting location. European Journal of Operational Research 145(3), 673–683 (2003)
Davis, O.A., Hinich, M.J., Ordeshook, P.C.: An expository development of a mathematical model of the electoral process. The American Political Science Review 64(2), 426–448 (1970)
Durier, R.: Continuous location theory under majority rule. Mathematics of Operations Research 14(2), 258–274 (1989)
Hansen, P., Thisse, J.-F.: Outcomes of voting and planning: Condorcet, Weber and Rawls locations. Journal of Public Economics 16(1), 1–15 (1981)
Kress, D., Pesch, E.: Sequential competitive location on networks. European Journal of Operational Research 217(3), 483–499 (2012)
Labbé, M.: Outcomes of voting and planning in single facility location problems. European Journal of Operational Research 20(3), 299–313 (1985)
McKelvey, R.D., Wendell, R.E.: Voting equilibria in multidimensional choice spaces. Mathematics of Operations Research 1(2), 144–158 (1976)
Wendell, R.E., McKelvey, R.D.: New perspectives in competitive location theory. European Journal of Operational Research 6(2), 174–182 (1981)
Wendell, R.E., Thorson, S.J.: Some generalizations of social decisions under majority rule. Econometrica 42(5), 893–912 (1974)
Wu, Y.-W., Lin, W.-Y., Wang, H.-L., Chao, K.-M.: Computing plurality points and Condorcet points in Euclidean space. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation, pp. 688–698 (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lin, WY., Wu, YW., Wang, HL., Chao, KM. (2015). Forming Plurality at Minimum Cost. In: Rahman, M.S., Tomita, E. (eds) WALCOM: Algorithms and Computation. WALCOM 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8973. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15612-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15612-5_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15611-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15612-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)