Skip to main content

Multiobjective Optimization of Bioactive Compound Extraction Process via Evolutionary Strategies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Information and Database Systems (ACIIDS 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9012))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Systematic and simultaneous optimization of a collection of objectives is called multiobjective or multicriteria optimization. These sorts of optimization procedures are becoming commonplace in fields involving engineering design, process and system optimization. In this work, the multiobjective (MO) optimization of the bioactive compound extraction process was carried out. Using the Normal Boundary Intersection (NBI) approach the MO optimization problem is transformed into a weighted form called the beta-subproblem. This subproblem is then solved using two evolutionary strategies (differential evolution (DE) and genetic algorithm (GA)). Using these evolutionary strategies, the solutions to the extraction process which form the efficient Pareto frontier was generated. The Hypervolume Indicator (HVI) was applied to the solutions to rank the strategies based on the solution quality. Critical analyses and comparative studies were then carried out on the strategies employed in this work and that from the previous work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deep, S.K., Katiyar, V.K.: Extraction optimization of bioactive compounds from gardenia using particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of Global Conference on Power Control and Optimization (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Li, X., Branke, J., Kieley, M.: On performance metrics and particle swarm methods for dynamic multiobjective optimization problems. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp 576–583 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li, X.: Better spread and convergence: particle swarm multiobjective optimization using the maximin fitness function. In: Deb, K., Tari, Z. (eds.) GECCO 2004. LNCS, vol. 3102, pp. 117–128. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Stanikov, R.B., Matusov, J.B.: Multicriteria Optimization and Engineering. Chapman and Hall, New York (1995)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Auger, A., Bader, J., Brockhoff, D., Zitzler, E.: Theory of the hypervolume indicator: optimal μ-distributions and the choice of the reference point. In: Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGEVO Workshop on Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, pp 87–102 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grosan, C.: Performance metrics for multiobjective optimization evolutionary algorithms. In: Proceedings of Conference on Applied and Industrial Mathematics (CAIM), Oradea (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zitzler, E., Thiele, L.: Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary algorithms - a comparative case study. In: Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN V), pp 292–301 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Knowles, J., Corne, D.: Properties of an Adaptive Archiving Algorithm for Storing Nondominated Vectors. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 7(2), 100–116 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sandgren, E.: Multicriteria design optimization by goal programming. In: Adeli, H. (ed.) Advances in Design Optimization, pp. 225–265. Chapman & Hall, London (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Igel, C., Hansen, N., Roth, S.: Covariance Matrix Adaptation for Multi-objective Optimization. Evolutionary Computation 15(1), 1–28 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Storn, R., Price, K.V.: Differential evolution – a simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces, ICSI, Technical Report TR-95-012 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Holland, J.H.: Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control and Artificial Intelligence. MIT Press, USA (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Das, I., Dennis, J.E.: Normal-boundary intersection: A new method for generating the Pareto surface in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems. SIAM Journal of Optimization 8(3), 631–657 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Babu, B.V., Munawar, S.A.: Differential evolution for the optimal design of heat exchangers. In: Proceedings of All-India seminar on Chemical Engineering Progress on Resource Development: A Vision 2010 and Beyond, Bhuvaneshwar (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Babu, B.V., Singh, R.P.: Synthesis & optimization of heat integrated distillation systems using differential evolution. In: Proceedings of All- India seminar on Chemical Engineering Progress on Resource Development: A Vision 2010 and Beyond, Bhuvaneshwar (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Angira, R., Babu, B.V.: Optimization of non-linear chemical processes using modified differential evolution (MDE). In: Proceedings of the 2nd Indian International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Pune, India, pp. 911–923 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ganesan, T., Elamvazuthi, I., Shaari, K.Z.K., Vasant, P.: An Algorithmic Framework for Multiobjective Optimization. The Scientific World Journal 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ganesan, T., Elamvazuthi, I., Shaari, K.Z.K., Vasant, P.: Multiobjective Optimization of Green Sand Mould System Using Chaotic Differential Evolution. In: Gavrilova, M.L., Tan, C., Abraham, A. (eds.) Transactions on Computational Science XXI. LNCS, vol. 8160, pp. 145–163. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Elamvazuthi, I., Ganesan, T., Vasant, P.: A comparative study of HNN and Hybrid HNN-PSO techniques in the optimization of distributed generation (DG) power systems. In: 2011 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information System (ICACSIS), pp 195–200. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mirjalili, S., Lewis, A.: S-shaped versus V-shaped transfer functions for binary Particle Swarm Optimization. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation 9, 1–14 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy Ganesan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ganesan, T., Elamvazuthi, I., Vasant, P., Shaari, K.Z.K. (2015). Multiobjective Optimization of Bioactive Compound Extraction Process via Evolutionary Strategies. In: Nguyen, N., Trawiński, B., Kosala, R. (eds) Intelligent Information and Database Systems. ACIIDS 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9012. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15705-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15705-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15704-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15705-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics