Skip to main content

User Experience Design for Inexperienced Gamers: GAP—Game Approachability Principles

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Game User Experience Evaluation

Part of the book series: Human–Computer Interaction Series ((HCIS))

Abstract

Game Approachability Principles (GAP) is a set of useful guidelines for game designers to create better tutorials, and new player experiences—especially for the casual gamer. Developing better first learning levels can be a key step to ease the casual gamer into play and to do so proactively—at the conceptual design phase before it is too costly or cumbersome to restructure the tutorials as would be the case later in the development cycle. Thus, Game Approachability, in the context of game development, is defined as making games initially more friendly, fun, immersive, and accessible for those players who have the desire to play, yet do not always follow-through to actually playing the game. GAP has evolved through a series of stages assessing accessibility (NB Approachability and Accessibility are used interchangeably throughout this chapter) as a stand-alone, heuristic-based approach versus one-on-one User Testing. Outcomes suggest potential for GAP as an (1) effective Heuristic Evaluation, (2) adjunct to User Testing, and (3) as a proactive checklist of principles in to conceptually design the new player experience and/or tutorial to increase Game Approachability—for all levels of gamers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The names of the games cannot be revealed due to confidentiality agreements

  2. 2.

    This is the GAP list of major categories, the full list of GAP is available upon request.

References

  • Bandura A (1977) Social learning theory. General Learning, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1994) Self-efficacy. In: Ramachaudran VS (ed) Encyclopedia of human behavior, vol 4. Academic, New York, pp 71–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruer J (2000) Schools for thought. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Benyon D, Turner P, Turner S (2005) Designing interactive systems. People, Activities, Contexts, Technologies

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi M (2008) Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Harper Perennial Modern Classics, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Desurvire H (1994) Faster cheaper!! are usability inspection methods as effective as empirical testing? In: Nielsen J, Mack R (eds) Usability inspection methods. J. Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 173–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Desurvire H (2007) List of core and approachability principles for good game design (LA CHI Association Meeting Presentation)

    Google Scholar 

  • Desurvire H, Chen B (2006) 48 differences between good and bad video games: game playability principles (PLAY) for designing highly ranked video games

    Google Scholar 

  • Desurvire H, Wiberg C (2007) Master of the game. In the proceedings of the CMID’07 The first international conference on cross-media interaction design, held in Hemavan Sweden, April 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Desurvire H, Wiberg C (2008) Master of the Game: Assessing Approachability in Future Game Design In the proceedings of CHI 2008 (http://publik.tuwien.ad.at/files/PubDat_167638.pdf (Page 3177)), Florence, Italy, April, 2008

  • Desurvire H, Wiberg C (2009) Game usability heuristics (PLAY) for evaluating and designing better games: the next iteration. HCI conference, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Desurvire H, Caplan M, Toth J (2004) Using heuristics to improve the playability of games. CHI conference, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Desurvire H, Jegers K, Wiberg C (2007) Evaluating fun and entertainment: developing a conceptual framework design of evaluation methods. Presented at the workshop ‘HCI and New Media Arts: Methodology and Evaluation’ at the CHI 2007 conference, San Jose CA, USA, April

    Google Scholar 

  • Desurvire H, Wiberg C (2009) Game usability heuristics (PLAY) for evaluating and designing better games: the next iteration. HCI Conference, 2009, San Diego, California USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Federoff M (2002) Heuristics and usability guidelines for the creation and evaluation of FUN in video games. Thesis at the University Graduate School of Indiana University, Dec. 2002 (melissafederoff@yahoo.com)

    Google Scholar 

  • Federoff M (2003) User testing for games: getting better data earlier. Game Developer Magazine (June 2003), pp. 35–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Forlizzi J, Battarbee K (2004) Understanding experience in interactive systems. Proceedings of DIS2004, Cambridge, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee JP (2003) What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee JP (2005) Learning by design: games as learning machines: Interactive Educational Multimedia 8: (15–23)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassenzahl M, Tractinsky N (2006) User experience—a research agenda. Behav Inf Technol 25(2):99–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassenzahl M, Law E, Hvannberg ET (2006). User experience—towards a unified view. The 2nd COST294-MAUSE International Open Workshop held in conjunction with NordiChi, Oct, 14, 2006, Oslo, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jegers K (2007) Pervasive game flow: Understanding player enjoyment in pervasive gaming. J Comp Entertainment (CIE), ACM

    Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen H, Elina M (2006) Koivisto: playability heuristics for mobile games. Mobile HCI 2006: 9–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone TW (1982) Heuristics for designing enjoyable user interfaces: lessons from computer games. In: Thomas JC, Schneider ML (eds) Human factors in computing systems. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy J, Wright PC (2004) Technology as experience. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen J (1993) Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufmann Inc, San Francisco

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ormond JE (1999) Human learning, 3rd ed. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagulayan R, Keeker K, Fuller T, Wixon D, Romero R (2003) User-centered design in games (revision). In: Jacko J, Sears A (eds) Handbook for human-computer interaction in interactive systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweetser P, Wyeth P (2005) GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. J Comp Entertainment (CIE), 3(3). ACM

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderheiden G (2003) Interaction for diverse users. In: Jacko JA, Sears A (eds) The human-computer interaction handbook. Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, pp 397–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiberg C (2003) A measure of fun: extending the concept of web usability. PhD Thesis. Dept of informatics, Umeå University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yee N (2007) Motivations of play in online games. CyberPsychol Behav 9:772–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather Desurvire .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Desurvire, H., Wiberg, C. (2015). User Experience Design for Inexperienced Gamers: GAP—Game Approachability Principles. In: Bernhaupt, R. (eds) Game User Experience Evaluation. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15985-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15985-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15984-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15985-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics