Skip to main content

Automatic Dialogue Act Annotation within Arabic Debates

  • Conference paper
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9041))

Abstract

Dialogue acts play an important role in the identification of argumentative discourse structure in human conversations. In this paper, we propose an automatic dialogue acts annotation method based on supervised learning techniques for Arabic debates programs. The choice of this kind of corpora is justified by its large content of argumentative information. To experiment annotation results, we used a specific annotation scheme relatively reliable for our task with a kappa agreement of 84%. The annotation process was yield using Weka platform algorithms experimenting Naive Bayes, SVM and Decision Trees classifiers. We obtained encouraging results with an average accuracy of 53%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, A., Bader, M., Bard, E., Boyle, E., Doherty, G.: The HCRC Map Task Corpus. Language and Speech 34, 351–366 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carletta, J., Isard, A., Isard, S., Kowtko, J., Doherty-Sneddon, G., Anderson, A.: The reliability of a dialogue structure coding scheme. Computational Linguistics 23, 13–31 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Walker, M.A., Moore, J.D.: Empirical Studies in Discourse. Computational Linguistics 20(2) (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Allen, J., Core, M.: Draft of DAMSL: Dialog Act Markup in Several Layers. Technical report (January 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jurafsky, D., Bates, R., Coccaro, N., Martin, R., Meteer, M., Ries, K., Shriberg, E., Stolcke, A., Taylor, P., Van Ess-Dykema, C.: Automatic Detection of Discourse Structure for Speech Recognition and Understanding. In: Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE Workshop on Speech Recognition and Understanding, Santa Barbara (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bunt, H.: Dimensions in dialogue annotation. In: Proceedings of LREC 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bunt, H.: The DIT++ taxonomy for functional dialogue markup. In: Heylen, D., Pelachaud, C., Catizone, R., Traum, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the AAMAS 2009 Workshop Towards a Standard Markup Language for Embodied Dialogue Acts (EDAML 2009), Budapest, May 12 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Searle, J.R.: Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1969)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Stolcke, A., Ries, K., Coccaro, N., Shriberg, E., Bates, R., Jurafsky, D., Taylor, P., Martin, R., Van Ess-Dykema, C., Meteer, M.: Dialogue Act Modeling for Automatic Tagging and Recognition of Conversational Speech. Computational Linguistics 26(3), 339–373 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh, S., Kearns, M., Litman, D., Walker, M.: Reinforcement learning for spoken dialogue systems. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 12, 956–962 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Martınez-Hinarejos, C.D., Benedı, J.M., Granell, R.: Statistical framework for a Spanish spoken dialogue corpus. Speech Communication 50, 992–1008 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bangalore, S., Di Fabbrizio, G., Stent, A.: Learning the structure of task-driven human–human dialogs. In: Proceedings of ACL, Sydney, Australia, pp. 201–208 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rangarajan Sridhar, V.K., Bangalore, S., Narayanan, S.: Exploiting acoustic and syntactic features for prosody labeling in a maximum entropy framework. In: Proceedings of NAACL-HLT (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Webb, N., Hepple, M., Wilks, Y.: Dialogue act classification based on intra-utterance features. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Spoken Language Understanding, Pittsburgh, PA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hoque, M.E., Sorower, M.S., Yeasin, M., Louwerse, M.M.: What Speech Tells us about Discourse: The Role of Prosodic and Discourse Features in Dialogue Act Classification. In: IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Orlando, FL (August 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bangalore, S., Di Fabbrizio, G., Stent, A.: Learning the structure of task-driven human–human dialogs. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 16(7), 1249–1259 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Di Eugenio, B., Xie, Z., Serafin, R.: Dialogue act classification, higher order dialogue structure, and instance-based learning. Dialogue & Discourse 1(2), 1–24 (2010a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Core, M., Allen, J.: Coding Dialogs with the DAMSL annotation scheme. In: AAAI Fall Symposium on Communicative Action in Humans and Machines. MIT, Cambridge (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Levin, L., Thymé-Gobbell, A., Lavie, A., Ries, K., Zechner, K.: A discourse coding scheme for conversational Spanish. In: Fifth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ries, K.: HMM and neural network based speech act detection. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Phoenix, AZ, pp. 497–500 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shala, L., Rus, V., Graesser, A.C.: Automated speech act classification in Arabic. Subjetividad y Procesos Cognitivos 14, 284–292 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Grosz, B., Sidner, C.: Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse. Computational Linguistics 19(3) (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schegloff, E.A., Sacks, H.: Opening Up Closings. Semiotica 7, 289–327 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pallotta, V., Ghorbel, H., Ruch, P., Coray, G.: An argumentative annotation schema for meeting discussions. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources (LREC 2004), Lisbon, Portugal, May 26-28, pp. 1003–1006 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Galley, M., McKeown, K., Hirschberg, J., Shriberg, E.: Identifying agreement and disagreement in conversational speech: Use of bayesian networks to model pragmatic dependencies. In ACL 2004, Barcelona (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kunz, W., Rittel, H.W.J.: Issues as elements of information systems. Technical Report WP-131, Berkeley: University of California (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ben Dbabis, S., Mallek, F., Ghorbel, H., Belguith, L.: Dialogue Acts Annotation Scheme within Arabic discussions. In: Sixteenth Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (SemDial 2012), Paris, France, September 19-21 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Carletta, J.C.: Assessing agreement on classification tasks: the kappa statistic. Computational Linguistics 22(2), 249–254 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sridar, V.K.R., Bangalore, S., Narayanan, S.S.: Combining lexical, syntactic and prosodic cues for improved online dialog act tagging. Computer Speech & Language 23(4), 407–422 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim, S.N., Cavedon, L., Baldwin2010, T.: Classifying dialogue acts in one-on-one live chats. In: Proceedings of EMNLP 2010, the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 862–871. Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Boyer, K.E., Grafsgaard, J.F., Ha, E.Y., Phillips, R., Lester, J.C.: An affect-enriched dialogue act classification model for task-oriented dialogue. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies-, vol. 1, pp. 1190–1199. Association for Computational Linguistics (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ha, E.Y., Grafsgaard, J.F., Mitchell, C., Boyer, K.E., Lester, J.C.: Combining verbal and nonverbal features to overcome the “information gap” in taskoriented dialogue. In: Proceedings of SIGdial 2012, the 13th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, Seoul, South Korea, pp. 247–256. Association for Computational Linguistics (July 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kim, S.N., Cavedon, L., Baldwin, T.: Classifying dialogue acts in multi-party live chats. In: Proceedings of the 26th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information, and Computation, Bali, Indonesia, pp. 463–472. Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Indonesia (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Habash, N., Rambow, O., Roth, R.: MADA+TOKAN: A Toolkit for Arabic Tokenization, Diacritization, Morphological Disambiguation, POS Tagging, Stemming and Lemmatization. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Arabic Language Resources and Tools (MEDAR), Cairo, Egypt (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ivanovic, E.: Automatic instant messaging dialogue using statistical models and dialogue acts. Master’s thesis, University of Melbourne (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H.: The WEKA data mining software: An update. SIGKDD Explorations 11(1) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dbabis, S.B., Ghorbel, H., Belguith, L.H., Kallel, M. (2015). Automatic Dialogue Act Annotation within Arabic Debates. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9041. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18111-0_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18111-0_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18110-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18111-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics