Abstract
In this paper are analyzed two different methods for comparing discourse tree structures. The aim is to identify the best technique to evaluate the output of discourse parser system. The first, is a traditional method and is based on quantifying the similarities between the parser output and a reference discourse tree (gold tree). It uses three scores: Precision, Recall, and F-measures. The second one examines the discourse tree representations in qualitative terms. Like first one, three scores are computed: Overlapping score, for analyzing the similarities in terms of topology, Nuclearity scores which take into account the type of nodes, and Veins scores which measure the coherence of discourse. By evaluating discourse tree structure resulted from a parser, the performance of discourse parser systems can be measured. A comparative survey is realized aiming to present assessment methods for discourse tree structures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Langer H (2001) Syntax and parsing. In: Carstensen K-U, Ebert C, Endriss C, Jekat S, Klabunde R, Langer H (eds) Computerlinguistik und Sprachtechnologie. Eine Einführung, pp 203–245. Heidelberg, Berlin: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag
Soricut R, Marcu D (2003) Sentence level discourse parsing using syntactic and lexical information. In: Proceedings of the HLT/NAACL, pp 228–235
Kermes H (2003) On-line text analysis for computational lexicography. Ph.D. thesis, IMS, University of Stuttgart. Arbeitspapiere des Instituts für Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung (AIMS), vol 9, number 3
Eckle-Kohler J (1999) Linguistisches Wissen zur automatischen Lexicon-Akquisition aus deutschen Textcorpora. Ph. D. thesis, Universität Stuttgart: IMS
Marcu D (2000) The rhetorical parsing of unrestricted texts: a surface-based approach. Comput Linguist 26(3):395–448
Mitocariu E, Anechitei DA, Cristea D (2013) Comparing discourse tree structures. In: Gelbukh A (ed) Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing 1, vol 7816
Mann WC, Thompson SA (1998) Rhetorical structure theory: toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8(3):243–81
Cristea D, Ide N, Romary L (1998) Veins theory: a model of global discourse cohesion and coherence. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on computational linguistics
Black E (1992) Meeting of interest group on evaluation of broad-coverage grammars of English. LINGUIST List 3.587. http://www.linguistlist.org/issues/3/3-587.html
Carroll JA, Briscoe E, Sanlippo A (1998) Parser evaluation: a survey and a new proposal. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on language resources and evaluation, Granada, Spain, pp 447–454
Briscoe EJ, Carroll JA, Copestake A (2002) Relational evaluation schemes. In: Proceedings workshop beyond parseval—towards improved evaluation measures for parsing systems, 3rd international conference on language resources and evaluation, pp 4–38. Las Palmas, Canary Islands
Sampson Geoffrey, Babarczy Anna (2003) A test of the leaf-ancestor metric for parse accuracy. Nat Lang Eng 9(4):365–380
Maziero EG, Pardo TAS (2009) Metodologia de avaliação automática de estruturas retóricas [methodology for automatic evaluation of rhetorical structures]. In: 7th Brazilian symposium in information and human language technology (STIL), São Carlos, Brazil
Acknowledgments
This paper is supported by the Sectoral Operational Programme Human Resources Developed (SOP HRD), financed from the European Social Fund and by the Romanian Government under the contract number POSDRU/159/1.5/S/133675.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mitocariu, E. (2016). Evaluating the Performance of Discourse Parser Systems. In: Balas, V., C. Jain, L., Kovačević, B. (eds) Soft Computing Applications. SOFA 2014. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 356. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18296-4_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18296-4_41
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18295-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18296-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)