Skip to main content

Five and Ten Years on: Have DSR Standards Changed?

  • Conference paper
New Horizons in Design Science: Broadening the Research Agenda (DESRIST 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9073))

Abstract

It has been more than ten years since the publication of Hevner et al [1] and five years since Venable [2] surveyed editors and DSR researchers on standards and criteria for judging the quality and suitability of DSR submissions for publication. Since then, there has been much further discussion about evaluation, design theory, and standards for DSR publication. This paper attempts to answer the question of how standards for judging the quality (e.g., rigour and relevance) of DSR research publications have changed since 2010 and to develop a snapshot of the relative importance of different extant DSR publication criteria. To do so, the author surveyed editors of IS Scholars’ “basket-of-eight” journals, DESRIST conference program committee members, and DESRIST (co-)authors. This paper compares the quantitative findings of the current survey to the 2010 survey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Venable, J.R.: Design Science Research Post Hevner et al: Criteria, Standards, Guidelines, and Expectations. In: Winter, R., Zhao, J.L., Aier, S. (eds.) DESRIST 2010. LNCS, vol. 6105, pp. 109–123. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Arnott, D., Pervan, G.: Design Science in Decision Support Systems Research: An assessment using the Hevner, March, Park, and Ram guidelines. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 13(11), 923–949 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arnott, D., Pervan, G.: A critical analysis of decision support systems research revisited: the rise of design science. Journal of Information Technology, 1–25 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research. In: Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M., Kuechler, B. (eds.) DESRIST 2012. LNCS, vol. 7286, pp. 423–438. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Venable, J.R., Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.: FEDS: A Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research. European Journal of Information Systems (2014), advance online publication at http://www.palgrave-journals.com/doifinder/10.1057/ejis.2014.36

  7. Walls, J.G., Widmeyer, G.R., El Sawy, O.: Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research 3(1), 36–59 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Walls, J.G., Widmeyer, G.R., El Sawy, O.: Assessing Information System Design Theory in Perspective: How Useful Was Our 1992 Initial Rendition? JITTA: Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 6(2), 43–58 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Venable, J.R.: The Role of Theory and Theorising in Design Science Research. In: First International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST 2006), Claremont, CA, USA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gregor, S., Jones, D.: The Anatomy of a Design Theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8(5), 312–335 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Baskerville, R., Pries-Heje, J.: Explanatory Design Theory. Business & Information Systems Engineering (5), 271–282 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Venable, J.R.: Rethinking Design Theory in Information Systems. In: vom Brocke, J., Hekkala, R., Ram, S., Rossi, M. (eds.) DESRIST 2013. LNCS, vol. 7939, pp. 136–149. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Venable, J.R.: A Framework for Design Science Research Activities. In: 2006 Information Resource Management Association Conference. Information Resource Management Association, Washington, DC (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Baskerville, R., Pries-Heje, J., Venable, J.R.: Evaluation Risks in Design Science Research: A Framework. In: Baskerville, R., Vaishnavi, V. (eds.) 3rd International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST 2008), Atlanta, Georgia, USA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R., Venable, J.R.: Strategies for Design Science Research Evaluation. In: Golden, W., Acton, T., Conboy, K., van der Heijden, H., Tuunainen, V.K. (eds.) 16th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2008), Galway, Ireland (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems 15(4), 251–266 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sun, Y., Kantor, P.B.: Cross-Evaluation: A new model for information system evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57(5), 614–628 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rossi, M., Sein, M.: Design Research Workshop: A Proactive Research Approach (2003), http://tiesrv.hkkk.fi/iris26/presentation/workshop_designRes.pdf (retrieved July 17, 2005)

  19. Avital, M., Te’eni, D.: From generative fit to generative capacity: exploring an emerging dimension of information systems design and task performance. Information Systems Journal 19(4), 345–367 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gill, T.G., Hevner, A.: A Fitness-Utility Model for Design Science Research. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems 4(2), 237–252 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gregor, S., Hevner, A.: Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly 37(2), 337–355 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Venable, J.R.: Using Coloured Cognitive Mapping (CCM) for Design Science Research. In: Tremblay, M.C., VanderMeer, D., Rothenberger, M., Gupta, A., Yoon, V. (eds.) DESRIST 2014. LNCS, vol. 8463, pp. 345–359. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John R. Venable .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Venable, J.R. (2015). Five and Ten Years on: Have DSR Standards Changed?. In: Donnellan, B., Helfert, M., Kenneally, J., VanderMeer, D., Rothenberger, M., Winter, R. (eds) New Horizons in Design Science: Broadening the Research Agenda. DESRIST 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9073. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18714-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18714-3_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18713-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18714-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics