Skip to main content

Abstract

In this paper we remarked the relevance of using of privacy-protection measures in trust models, since them imply conscious exchanges of opinions about third parties. Additionally to the already published description of the extra message exchanges that would protect privacy in a agent-mediated trust domain as ART testbed, we evaluate (through estimated weights) the communication and computation cost of these additional message exchanges at the level of their interactions. Although the effects of introducing them on the accuracy of trust valuations could also be considered in future works, in this contribution we focus our attention in an approach based on the weight of the information brought by an interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bellifemine, F.L., Caire, G., Greenwood, D.: Developing Multi-Agent Systems with JADE (Wiley Series in Agent Technology). John Wiley & Sons (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carbo, J., Molina, J.M.: A jade-based art-inspired ontology and protocols for handling trust and reputation. In: Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, ISDA. pp. 300–305 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carbo, J., Pedraza, J., Lopez, M., Molina, J.M.: Privacy protection in trust models for agent societies. In: de la Puerta, J.G., Ferreira, I.G., Bringas, P.G., Klett, F., Abraham, A., de Carvalho, A.C.P.L.F., Herrero, A., Baruque, B., Quintián, H., Corchado, E. (eds.) International Joint Conference SOCO’14-CISIS’14-ICEUTE’14. AISC, vol. 299, pp. 135–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Committees, F.T.: Foundations for Intelligent Phisical Agents Specifications. Geneve, Switzerland (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Davidsson, P., Johansson, S., Svahnberg, M.: Characterization and evaluation of multi-agent system architectural styles. In: Garcia, A., Choren, R., Lucena, C., Giorgini, P., Holvoet, T., Romanovsky, A. (eds.) SELMAS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3914, pp. 179–188. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Dellarocas, C.: The digitization of word of mouth: promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Manag. Sci. 49, 1407–1424 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Esfandiari, B., Chandrasekharan, S.: On how agents make friends: mechanisms for trust acquisition. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies, pp. 27–34 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fullam, K., Klos, T., Muller, G., Sabater, J., Schlosser, A., Topol, Z., Barber, K.S., Rosenschein, J., Vercouter, L., Voss, M.: A specification of the agent reputation and trust (art) testbed: experimentation and competition for trust in agent societies. In: The Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-2005), pp. 512–518 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gaspar, G.: Communication and belief changes in a society of agents: towards a formal model of autonomous agent, d.a.i. 2, 1991. In: Descentralized A. I. 2. pp. 245–255. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Giunchiglia, F., Mylopoulos, J., Perini, A.: The tropos software development methodology: processes, models and diagrams. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 63–74. ACM Press (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gómez, M., Carbo, J., Benac-Earle, C.: Honesty and trust revisited: the advantages of being neutral about other’s cognitive models. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. 15(3), 313–335 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Calvo-Rolle, J.L., Corchado, E.: A bio-inspired knowledge system for improving combined cycle plant control tuning. Neurocomputing 126, 95–105 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Joumaa, H., Demazeau, Y., Vincent, J.: Evaluation of multi-agent systems: the case of interaction. In: 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wozniak, M., Graa, M., Corchadob, E.: A survey of multiple classifier systems as hybrid systems. Inf. Fusion 16, 3–17 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Moya, J., Carbo, J.: Distributing art agents with JADE. In: 10th European Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems, EUMAS (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bresciani, P., Giorgini, P., Giunchiglia, F., Mylopoulos, J., Perini, A.: TROPOS: an agent-oriented software development methodology. J. Auton. Agent. Multi-Agent Syst. 8(3), 203–236 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Parliament, E.: Directive 95/46/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 24 october 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, October 1995. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31995L0046:en:HTML

  18. Pedraza, J., Patricio, M.A., de Ass, A., Molina, J.: Privacy-by-design rules in face recognition system. Neurocomputing 109, 49–55 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sabater-Mir, J., Sierra, C.: Review on computational trust and reputation models. Artif. Intel. Rev. 24, 33–60 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sanchez-Pi, N., Griol, D., Carbo, J., Molina, J.M.: Evaluating interaction of MAS providing context-aware services. In: O’Shea, J., Nguyen, N.T., Crockett, K., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES-AMSTA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6682, pp. 373–382. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Yu, B., Singh, M.P.: An evidential model of distributed reputation management. In: Proceedings of First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 294–301. ACM Press (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by Projects MINECO TEC2012-37832-C02-01, CICYT TEC2011-28626-C02-02, CAM CONTEXTS (S2009/TIC-1485).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mar Lopez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lopez, M., Carbo, J., Molina, J.M. (2015). Costs of Protecting Privacy in Agent Trust Relationships. In: Bajo, J., et al. Highlights of Practical Applications of Agents, Multi-Agent Systems, and Sustainability - The PAAMS Collection. PAAMS 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 524. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19033-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19033-4_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19032-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19033-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics