Abstract
The formalization of human deductive reasoning is a main issue in artificial intelligence. Although classical logic is one of the most useful ways for the formalization, the material implication of classical logic has some fallacies. Relevant logic has been studied for the removal of material implication fallacies in classical logic for the formalization of human deductive reasoning. Relevant logic \(ER\) is free from fallacies of material implication and has more provability than typical relevant logic \(R\). Moreover, ER has a decision procedure, even though almost all relevant logics are undecidable. This is one of the reasons why \(ER\) is an appropriate logic for the formalization of human deductive reasoning. This paper implements automated theorem prover of Relevant logic \(ER\) and experiments on this theorem prover to check the processing time of implemented automated theorem prover.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackermann, W.: Begründung einer strenger Implikation. Journal of Symbolic Logic 21, 113–128 (1956)
Anderson, A.R, Belnap, N.D.: Entailment: The logic of relevance and necessity, vol. 1. Princeton University Press (1975)
Alonzo, C.: The weak positive implicational propositional calculus (abstract). The Journal of Symbolic Logic 16, 238 (1951)
Gabbay, D.M.: Labelled Deductive Systems, Oxford Logic Guides 33, vol. 1 (1996)
Gabbay, D., Guenthner, F. (eds.): Handbook of philosophical logic, vol. 3, pp. 150–180 (1986)
Moh, S.-K.: The deduction theorems and two new logical systems. Methodos 2, 6–75 (1950)
Brady, R.T.: Gentzenization and Decidability of Some Contraction-Less Relevant Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 20, 97–118 (1991)
Ross, T.B.: Relevant Implication and the Case for a Weaker Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 25, 151–183 (1996)
Urquhart, A.: The Undecidability of Entailment and Relevant Implication. Journal of Philosophical Logic 49, 1059–1073 (1984)
Yoshiura, N., Yonezaki, N.: Provability of relevant logic ER. In: Information Modeling and Knowledge Bases XIII, pp. 100–114. IOS Press (2001)
Yoshiura, N., Yonezaki, N.: A Decision Procedure for the Relevant Logic \(ER\), Tableaux 2000, published in University of St. Andrews Research Report CS/00/01, pp. 109–123 (2000)
Cheng, J.: The Fundamental Role of Entailment in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Journal of Computing and Information 2(1), 853–873 (1996)
The MiniSat Page. http://minisat.se/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yoshiura, N. (2015). Implementation of Theorem Prover of Relevant Logic. In: Ali, M., Kwon, Y., Lee, CH., Kim, J., Kim, Y. (eds) Current Approaches in Applied Artificial Intelligence. IEA/AIE 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9101. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19066-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19066-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19065-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19066-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)