Skip to main content

Comparative Evaluation of Two Systems for Integrating Biometric Data from Self-quantification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Health Information Science (HIS 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9085))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A layperson can accumulate a large volume of biometric data using the self quantification tools available in the consumer electronics market. However to derive insight, one must be able to integrate data types in order to identify patterns that emerge. This paper compares the practicalities of integrating biometric data from self-quantification, using the TicTrac and HealthVault integration tools. The techniques needed to use such tools may be challenging for many consumers. The aggregated data may have data quality issues. These factors limit the realization of benefits for individual or population health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Almalki, M., Sanchez, F., Gray, K.: Self-Quantification: The Informatics of Personal Data Management for Health and Fitness. Institute for a Broadband Enabled Society (IBES). The University of Melbourne (2013). http://www.broadband.unimelb.edu.au/resources/white-paper/2013/Self-Quantification.pdf

  2. Bevan, N.: Extending quality in use to provide a framework for usability measurement. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCD 2009. LNCS, vol. 5619, pp. 13–22. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhandari, V.: Enabling programmable self with HealthVault. O’Reilly Media Inc., Sebastopol (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fitbit. (n.d). https://www.fitbit.com/au/aria

  5. Fox, S.: The Social Life of Health Information: Pew Internet & American Life Project (2013). http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/

  6. Frost, J.H., Massagli, M.P.: Social Uses of Personal Health Information Within PatientsLikeMe, an Online Patient Community: What Can Happen When Patients Have Access to One Another’s Data. Journal of Medical Internet Research 10(3), e15 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. HealthVault (n.d.). https://www.HealthVault.com/au/en

  8. Hullman, J.: Benefitting InfoVis with Visual difficulties. IEEE Transactions on visualization and computer graphics 17(12), 2213–2222 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. iHealth. (n.d.). http://www.ihealthlabs.com/blood-pressure-monitors/wireless-blood-pressure-monitor/

  10. Lark. (n.d.). http://support.lark.com/hc/en-us/categories/200215850-Lark-and-Lark-Pro-wearable-sleep-device

  11. Lupton, D.: Quantifying the body: monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies. Critical Public Health. 23(4), 393–403 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Polar. (n.d). http://www.polar.com/au-en/products/get_active/fitness_crosstraining/loop

  13. Shackel, B.: Usability – Context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. Interacting with computers 21, 339–346 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Smarr, L.: Quantifying your body: A how-to guide from a systems biology perspective. Biotechnology Journal 7, 980–991 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Swan, M.: Health 2050: The realization of personalized medicine through crowdsourcing, the quantified self, and the participatory Biocitizen. Journal of Personalized Medicine 2, 93–118 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Technori. (n.d). http://technori.com/2013/04/4281-the-beginners-guide-to-quantified-self-plus-a-list-of-the-best-personal-data-tools-out-there/

  17. Tictrac (n.d.). https://www.Tictrac.com/

  18. Tilahun, B., Kauppinen, T., Kebler, C.: Design and Development of a Linked Open Data-Based Health Information Representation and Visualization System: Potentials and Preliminary Evaluation. JMIR Medical Informatics 2(2), 1 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen Gray .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Punnoose, B., Gray, K. (2015). Comparative Evaluation of Two Systems for Integrating Biometric Data from Self-quantification. In: Yin, X., Ho, K., Zeng, D., Aickelin, U., Zhou, R., Wang, H. (eds) Health Information Science. HIS 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9085. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19156-0_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19156-0_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19155-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19156-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics