Skip to main content

Recommendations for the Creation of Datasets in Support of Data Driven Activity Recognition Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9102))

Abstract

In the last decades, datasets have emerged as an essential component in the process of generating automated Activity Recognition (AR) solutions. Nevertheless, some challenges still remain: the lack of recommendations about which kind of information should be represented inside a dataset has resulted in the implementation of a variety of different non-standardized formalisms. On the other hand, this information is usually not sufficient to fully characterize the dataset. To address these challenges, this paper introduces a series of recommendations in the form of a dataset model with a well-defined semantic definition, for supporting those who are responsible for the creation, documentation and management of datasets. In addition, in order to better characterize datasets from a statistical point-of-view, we describe eight statistical analyses which should be included as additional measures within the dataset itself. We have validated our concepts through retrospectively analyzing a well-known dataset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chen, L., Nugent, C.D., Biswas, J., Hoey, J.: Activity recognition in pervasive intelligent environments, vo. 4. Springer Science & Business Media (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cook, D., Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., Crandall, A., Sanders, C., Thomas, B.: Collecting and disseminating smart home sensor data in the CASAS project. In: Proc. of the CHI Workshop on Developing Shared Home Behavior Datasets to Advance HCI and Ubiquitous Computing Research (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cook, D.J., Das, S.K.: How smart are our environments? an updated look at the state of the art. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 3(2), 53–73 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design patterns: elements of reusable object-oriented software. Pearson Education (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Katz, S., Downs, T.D., Cash, H.R., Grotz, R.C.: Progress in development of the index of ADL. The Gerontologist 10(1 Part 1), 20–30 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nugent, C.D., Finlay, D.D., Davies, R.J., Wang, H.Y., Zheng, H., Hallberg, J., Synnes, K., Mulvenna, M.D.: homeML – An open standard for the exchange of data within smart environments. In: Okadome, T., Yamazaki, T., Makhtari, M. (eds.) ICOST. LNCS, vol. 4541, pp. 121–129. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Nugent, C.D., Mulvenna, M.D., Hong, X., Devlin, S.: Experiences in the development of a smart lab. International Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology 2(4), 319–331 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Paton, N.W., Díaz, O.: Active database systems. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 31(1), 63–103 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Philipose, M., Fishkin, K.P., Perkowitz, M., Patterson, D.J., Fox, D., Kautz, H., Hahnel, D.: Inferring activities from interactions with objects. IEEE Pervasive Computing 3(4), 50–57 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Serna, A., Pigot, H., Rialle, V.: Modeling the progression of Alzheimer’s disease for cognitive assistance in smart homes. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 17(4), 415–438 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Turaga, P., Chellappa, R., Subrahmanian, V.S., Udrea, O.: Machine recognition of human activities: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 18(11), 1473–1488 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vail, D.L., Veloso, M.M., Lafferty, J.D.: Conditional random fields for activity recognition. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 235. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Van Kasteren, T., Noulas, A., Englebienne, G., Kröse, B.: Accurate activity recognition in a home setting. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 1–9. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fulvio Patara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Patara, F., Nugent, C.D., Vicario, E. (2015). Recommendations for the Creation of Datasets in Support of Data Driven Activity Recognition Models. In: Geissbühler, A., Demongeot, J., Mokhtari, M., Abdulrazak, B., Aloulou, H. (eds) Inclusive Smart Cities and e-Health. ICOST 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9102. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19312-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19312-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19311-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19312-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics