Abstract
This paper presents a novel task-oriented approach to crowdsource the drafting of a constitution. By considering micro-tasking as a particular form of crowdsourcing, it defines a workflow-based approach based on Onto2Flow, an ontology that models the basic concepts and roles to represent workflow-definitions. The approach is then applied to a prototype platform for constitution-making where human workers are requested to contribute to a set of tasks. The paper concludes by discussing previous approaches to participatory constitution-making and identifying areas for future work.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
United Nations Rule of Law - Guidance Note of the Secretary-General: United Nations Assistance to Constitution-making Processes (2009)
Klein, C., Sajo, A.: Constitution-making: process and substance. In: Rosenfeld, M., Sajé, A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, pp. 419–441. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)
Elster, J.: The optimal design of a constituent assembly. In: Landemore, H., Elster, J. (eds.) Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms, pp. 148–172. Cambridge University Press, New York (2012)
Howe, J.: The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Mag. 14, 1–4 (2006)
Luz, N., Silva, N., Novais, P.: A survey of task-oriented crowdsourcing. Artif. Intell. Rev. 43, 1–27 (2014)
Von Ahn L.: Human computation. In: 46th ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference, pp. 418 − 419 (2009)
Chklovski T.: Learner: a system for acquiring commonsense knowledge by analogy. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference on Knowledge Capture, pp. 4−12, Sanibel Island, FL (2003)
Singh, P., Lin, T.: Open mind common sense: knowledge acquisition from the general public. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2002: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE, pp. 1223–1237. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Orozco D.: Democratizing the law: legal crowdsourcing (lawsourcing) as a means to achieve legal, regulatory and policy objectives. Regul. Policy Objectives. 53(1), 1−43 (2014)
Poblet, M.: Visualizing the law: crisis mapping as an open tool for legal practice. J. Open Access Law. 1(1), 1–20 (2013)
Aitamurto, T.: Crowdsourcing for Democracy: New Era In Policy-Making. Committee for the Future Parliament of Finland, Helsinki (2012)
Casanovas, P.: Legal crowdsourcing and relational law: what the semantic web can do for legal education. J. Australas. Law Teach. Assoc. 5, 159–176 (2012)
Landemore, H.: Inclusive constitution-making: the icelandic experiment. J. Polit. Philos. 23(1), 1–26 (2014)
Gluck, J., Ballou, B.: New Technologies in Constitution Making. USIP, Washington (2014)
Deely S., Nesh-Nash T.: The future of democratic participation: an online constitution making platform, pp. 43−62 (2014)
Obrst, L., Liu, H., Wray, R.: Ontologies for corporate web applications. AI Mag. 24, 49 (2003)
Hornung T., Koschmider A., Mendling J.: Integration of heterogeneous BPM Schemas: the case of XPDL and BPEL. In: CAiSE Forum, vol. 231 (2006)
Luz, N., Pereira, C., Silva, N., Novais, P., Teixeira, A., Oliveira e Silva, M.: An Ontology for human-machine computation workflow specification. In: Polycarpou, M., de Carvalho, A.C., Pan, J.-S., Woźniak, M., Quintian, H., Corchado, E. (eds.) HAIS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8480, pp. 49–60. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Constitute Project. https://www.constituteproject.org/
Constitucio de Catalunya. Reagrupament.cat (2010)
Davis-Stober, C.P., Budescu, D.V., Dana, J., Broomell, S.B.: When is a crowd wise? Decision 1, 79 (2014)
Levine, S.S., Prietula, M.J.: The hazards of interaction: why isolation can benefit performance. In: Academy of Management Proceedings 2013, vol. 10736 (2013)
Ober, J.: Democracy’s wisdom: an aristotelian middle way for collective judgment. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 107, 104–122 (2013)
Luz, N., Silva, N., Novais, P.: Generating human-computer micro-task workflows from domain ontologies. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8510, pp. 98–109. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Acknowledgments
This work is part-funded by FEDER Funds, by the ERDF (European Regional Development Fund) through the COMPETE Programme (Operational Programme for Competitiveness) and by National Funds through the FCT (Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology) within the project FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-028980 (PTDC/EEI-SII/1386/2012). The work of Nuno Luz is supported by the doctoral grant SFRH/BD/70302/2010. The work of Marta Poblet draws from previous research within the framework of the project “Crowd sourcing: instrumentos semánticos para el desarrollo de la participación y la mediación online” (DER 2012-39492-C02-01) by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Luz, N., Poblet, M., Silva, N., Novais, P. (2015). Defining Human-Machine Micro-Task Workflows for Constitution Making. In: Kamiński, B., Kersten, G., Szapiro, T. (eds) Outlooks and Insights on Group Decision and Negotiation. GDN 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 218. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19515-5_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19515-5_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19514-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19515-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)