Skip to main content

Defining Human-Machine Micro-Task Workflows for Constitution Making

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Outlooks and Insights on Group Decision and Negotiation (GDN 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 218))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents a novel task-oriented approach to crowdsource the drafting of a constitution. By considering micro-tasking as a particular form of crowdsourcing, it defines a workflow-based approach based on Onto2Flow, an ontology that models the basic concepts and roles to represent workflow-definitions. The approach is then applied to a prototype platform for constitution-making where human workers are requested to contribute to a set of tasks. The paper concludes by discussing previous approaches to participatory constitution-making and identifying areas for future work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. United Nations Rule of Law - Guidance Note of the Secretary-General: United Nations Assistance to Constitution-making Processes (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Klein, C., Sajo, A.: Constitution-making: process and substance. In: Rosenfeld, M., Sajé, A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, pp. 419–441. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Elster, J.: The optimal design of a constituent assembly. In: Landemore, H., Elster, J. (eds.) Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms, pp. 148–172. Cambridge University Press, New York (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Howe, J.: The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Mag. 14, 1–4 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Luz, N., Silva, N., Novais, P.: A survey of task-oriented crowdsourcing. Artif. Intell. Rev. 43, 1–27 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Von Ahn L.: Human computation. In: 46th ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference, pp. 418 − 419 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chklovski T.: Learner: a system for acquiring commonsense knowledge by analogy. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference on Knowledge Capture, pp. 4−12, Sanibel Island, FL (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Singh, P., Lin, T.: Open mind common sense: knowledge acquisition from the general public. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2002: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE, pp. 1223–1237. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Orozco D.: Democratizing the law: legal crowdsourcing (lawsourcing) as a means to achieve legal, regulatory and policy objectives. Regul. Policy Objectives. 53(1), 1−43 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Poblet, M.: Visualizing the law: crisis mapping as an open tool for legal practice. J. Open Access Law. 1(1), 1–20 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Aitamurto, T.: Crowdsourcing for Democracy: New Era In Policy-Making. Committee for the Future Parliament of Finland, Helsinki (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Casanovas, P.: Legal crowdsourcing and relational law: what the semantic web can do for legal education. J. Australas. Law Teach. Assoc. 5, 159–176 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Landemore, H.: Inclusive constitution-making: the icelandic experiment. J. Polit. Philos. 23(1), 1–26 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gluck, J., Ballou, B.: New Technologies in Constitution Making. USIP, Washington (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Deely S., Nesh-Nash T.: The future of democratic participation: an online constitution making platform, pp. 43−62 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Obrst, L., Liu, H., Wray, R.: Ontologies for corporate web applications. AI Mag. 24, 49 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hornung T., Koschmider A., Mendling J.: Integration of heterogeneous BPM Schemas: the case of XPDL and BPEL. In: CAiSE Forum, vol. 231 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Luz, N., Pereira, C., Silva, N., Novais, P., Teixeira, A., Oliveira e Silva, M.: An Ontology for human-machine computation workflow specification. In: Polycarpou, M., de Carvalho, A.C., Pan, J.-S., Woźniak, M., Quintian, H., Corchado, E. (eds.) HAIS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8480, pp. 49–60. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Constitute Project. https://www.constituteproject.org/

  20. Constitucio de Catalunya. Reagrupament.cat (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Davis-Stober, C.P., Budescu, D.V., Dana, J., Broomell, S.B.: When is a crowd wise? Decision 1, 79 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Levine, S.S., Prietula, M.J.: The hazards of interaction: why isolation can benefit performance. In: Academy of Management Proceedings 2013, vol. 10736 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ober, J.: Democracy’s wisdom: an aristotelian middle way for collective judgment. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 107, 104–122 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Luz, N., Silva, N., Novais, P.: Generating human-computer micro-task workflows from domain ontologies. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8510, pp. 98–109. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is part-funded by FEDER Funds, by the ERDF (European Regional Development Fund) through the COMPETE Programme (Operational Programme for Competitiveness) and by National Funds through the FCT (Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology) within the project FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-028980 (PTDC/EEI-SII/1386/2012). The work of Nuno Luz is supported by the doctoral grant SFRH/BD/70302/2010. The work of Marta Poblet draws from previous research within the framework of the project “Crowd sourcing: instrumentos semánticos para el desarrollo de la participación y la mediación online” (DER 2012-39492-C02-01) by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuno Luz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Luz, N., Poblet, M., Silva, N., Novais, P. (2015). Defining Human-Machine Micro-Task Workflows for Constitution Making. In: Kamiński, B., Kersten, G., Szapiro, T. (eds) Outlooks and Insights on Group Decision and Negotiation. GDN 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 218. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19515-5_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19515-5_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19514-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19515-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics